• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Psychiatrist has 72 hours to assess whether pt is treat to self or others



It LIP feel pt should stay, must go to court and have judge concur



protects pt form being held indefinitely wtihout due cause or TX

Involuntary Emergency commitment

Pt admitted involuntarily by 2 MDs bc pt felt to be a threat to self or others or gravely ill


All other civil rights remain


Can be kept up to 60 days


After 60 days hospital must reapply to judge


Client can request lawyer and court date

Involuntary civil commitment

Pt voluntarily admits self, needs assessment by MD to verify need for admission


Can request to leave any time but must be assessed by MD (72 hr letter)


If MD concurs-pt d/c AMA


If MD feels pt threat to self or others-MD will make pt involuntary


Pt will be appointed lawyer and court date to contest MD decision

Voluntary Admission

Use before restraints


Always have sufficient staff (4 min)


Always 1:1


Initiated by RN, PO follow RN instructions


Can be done without LIP order, LIP must see pt within 1/2-1 hr


Explain pt how to behave to be released

Seculsion

Pt tied to bed by each limb and stomach


Can be initiated by RN


LIP order must be written with 1/2-1 hr, good for 2 hrs


Be prepared for physical struggle


Will need much man power


Pt must be 1:1


Last resort

Restraints

Communication protected by law, does not have to be released in a court hearing


Pt can waive by signed release/consent



excludes: child abuse (elder, MR), domestic violence, STD's, prevention of serious crime

Privileged communication

Mental health professional has legal obligation to warn any person of a credible threat against them


Tarasoff Case (1976)-therapist using priviledged comm. did not/could not warn gf of credible threat made by bf

Duty to Warn

Does person understand charges against them?


Can they work with lawyer to defend themself


If there is doubt, judge will order psych eval

Competency to stand trial

state of mind at time of crime


did pt know he was committing a crime


did pt know right from wrong


unable to control self


was pt psychotic at time

Insanity defense/M'Naghten Rule

Responsible for providing safe, competent, and ethical care


Standards of Care-set of expectations of what a similarly trained RN would do in similar situation


Negligence-SoC is not met and pt was measurably harmed

Nursing Liability

Wrongful act that results in injury, loss, or damage



May be intentional or unintentional

Tort

Specific type of negligence


Specific to RN, MD, DO, DMD, etc

Malpractice

Most severe form of negligence


RN willfully neglects duties and pt harmed



Gross negligence

Most cases of negligence or malpractice are handled in civil court not criminal court



Unless RN intentionally tried to harm pt


ie: Richard Angelo, Charles Cullen

General info card

Medication administration-wrong med, time, refuse to give PRN when indicated


Seclusion & Restraint-improper use, poor documentation


Assault-threats for PRN/restraint for lack of cooperation

Areas of liability for psych RNs

know state laws concerning profession & area of practice


know hospital policy & protocol


do not make unilateral decisions


document accurately but not excessively


pt welfare comes first


establish therapeutic alliance


never put self in position where sexual misconduct could be misconstrued by pt

Ways to avoid liability

theory that bases decisions on "the greatest good for the greatest number"

Utilitarianism

Theory that says decisions should be based on whether or not an action is morally right with no regard for the result or consequences

Deontology

Person's right to self-determination and indepence

Autonomy

one's duty to benefit or promote good for others

Beneficence

Requirement to do no harm intentionally or unintentionally

Nonmaleficence

Fairness

Justice

Duty to be honest and truthful

Veracity

Obligation to honor commitments and contracts

Fidelity