• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/41

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

41 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What exerts the greatest influence on the law’s focus on the enforcement of a contract after negotiations are complete and the formal contract is executed?
the preservation of the integrity, predictability, and reliability of contractual relationships
Which of the following would immediately let you know that a contract contains an element that would cause a court to hold that the contract is unenforceable?
an auxiliary mistake concerning the contract
While negotiating a commercial agreement, Juan made a misrepresentation that goes to the heart of the ensuing formal contract between the parties. How do you think the other party to the contract will act, once it becomes aware of the misrepresentation?
The other party may opt to enforce the contract or have it set aside.
What is the definition of the legal term “voidable contract”?
a contract that allows an aggrieved party to choose to keep it in force or bring to an end
In what way is a void contract different from a voidable contract?
A void contract contains a defect so substantial that it is of no force or effect.
Why is it necessary for Canadian law to grant children and mentally ill individuals special legal protection?
Both groups lack the legal capacity to be able to enter into binding contracts.
What are the elements of importance emphasized by contract law as it pertains to the legal capacity to form contracts?
consent and voluntariness
Which of the following would affect the status of a contract entered into by a minor upon that individual attaining the age of majority?
The contract is ratified after attaining legal capacity.
Cory, aged 17, plays hockey under contract with the Northern Manitoba Huskies junior hockey team. What is the legal term given to this particular type of contractual arrangement?
beneficial contract of service
A sales representative knowingly entered into a contract for an alarm system during a door-to-door sales campaign with an obviously mentally ill individual. Why could the contract be immediately rendered voidable at that individual customer’s request?
Establishing true consent is not possible due to the individual’s incapacity to grasp the essence and effect of the contract.
Even though Dalbert knew Rahim had consumed copious amounts of alcohol during the afternoon, both signed a contract written on a napkin whereby Rahim agreed to buy Dalbert’s old car for top dollar. Upon regaining his legal capacity, if Rahim opts to repudiate the contract on the basis of an improvident agreement, how must he proceed to void the contract?
He must claim relief due to unconscionability.
In contract law, the presence of which of the following elements would immediately alert a court to the possibility that an agreement may be voidable due to duress?
The use of a threat of physical harm results in a contract.
In the case of Bank of Montreal v. Duguid (2000), 47 O.R. (3d) 737 (C.A.), the court was asked to consider whether a wife who had signed a guarantee on a loan for her husband’s business was entitled to be released from the guarantee on the basis of undue influence exerted by her husband. Why did the majority of the court find that the guarantee was enforceable against the wife?
because the wife was a real estate agent and presumably knowledgeable enough to not be unduly influenced by her husband to sign the guarantee
In the case of Atlas Supply Co of Canada v. Yarmouth Equipment (1991), 103 NSR (2d) 1 (CA), the court considered whether a franchise agreement was unconscionable and therefore unenforceable because financial projections given by the franchisor were overly optimistic. Why did the court find that the contract was unconscionable?
because the franchisor gave misleading financial information and withheld contrary information
What is the definition of “undue influence” with respect to contractual relationships?
unfair manipulation that compromises someone’s free will
Holding a gun to someone’s head to induce them to enter a contract exemplifies which of the following legally exceptional circumstances?
undue influence resulting from actual pressure
How will a court that hears a matter involving one party allegedly taking advantage of another party’s unsophistication in relation to commercial matters arrive at a determination as to whether such an advantage actually existed?
The more powerful party must prove the absence of the presumed pressure.
Where circumstances surrounding a proposed commercial transaction involve an unsophisticated party, what would a court most likely accept as undisputable evidence that that party has proceeded with the transaction on a free and informed basis?
a certificate of independent legal advice
The case of Atlas Supply Co. of Canada v.Yarmouth Equipment (1991), 103 N.S.R. (2d) 1 (N.S.C.A.) disallowed the reliance on the defendant’s exclusion clauses to prevent evidence of the plaintiff’s reliance on misleading information provided by the defendant. The dissenting appellant court judge cautioned against setting aside business deals such as this one. What was the dissenting appellant court judge advocating by taking this position?
that the acceptance of bad faith misrepresentations is a legal commercial negotiating practice
In recent Alberta and Ontario appellant court decisions, the courts have regarded unconscionability as involving a four-step procedure. Which of the following will a judge now recognize as an additional step to be considered over and above the traditional two-step procedure?
imbalance in bargaining power due to ignorance of the language of the bargain
Most provincial jurisdictions in Canada have enacted legislation to provide a form of protection to consumers by setting unconscionability as a standard for the assessment of fairness of the bargain. What element of this legislation is most similar to elements addressed in separate, related consumer loan protection legislation?
The price grossly exceeded the price for similar, readily available goods or services.
How is a wilful omission with regard to relevant information during pre-contractual negotiations regarded in law?
as a breach of the duty to disclose information without being prompted
Johan is negotiating the possible sale of one of his company’s regional business operations to Bill. In response to Bill’s inquiry regarding the duration remaining on the existing supply contracts, Johan provided the end dates of the contracts themselves. Johan did not advise Bill that two of the customers were on the brink of insolvency. If Bill relies on the information Johan provided, what recourse will contract law allow him?
Partial provision of information allows the contract to be rescinded.
What criteria must be satisfied in order for a misrepresentation to be actionable?
the misrepresentation must be material to the contract
A seller unknowingly made a misrepresentation during negotiations to sell his car. Now that the seller is aware of the misrepresentation and the prospective buyer is returning to make an offer, what recourse is available to rectify the situation and accept the offer without risking an ensuing lawsuit?
The seller must attend to the prompt disclosure of the correct facts to the prospective buyer.
What is the goal of the common law remedy of rescission?
It seeks to return parties to their pre-contractual positions.
What categories of actionable misrepresentations entitle an innocent party to a common law remedy in damages?
fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation
What is the legal definition of “mistake”?
an error made by one or both parties that seriously undermines a contract
How does the common law classify a situation in which both parties to an agreement have shared the same fundamental mistake in order to provide a remedy?
as a common mistake
Which of the following forms the basis of a common argument for setting aside a contract based on mistake that will rarely succeed in Canadian courts?
misunderstanding of the nature or type of contract signed by the party
Under the classic model of illegality, a freely chosen contract will be held unenforceable by a court in which of the following circumstances?
if it is contrary to public policy and, or the doctrine of illegality
A judge has determined that offending portions of a contract can be severed and the remaining portions saved. What type of common law contractual infraction is this judge resolving?
an illegal contract
Why are contracts that unduly interfere with the ability to earn a livelihood or reduce competition generally unenforceable in common law?
They are contrary to the community’s common sense and common conscience.
Which of the following elements would a court consider when determining the enforceability of a non-competition clause on the grounds of reasonableness?
the reasonableness of location and time restrictions
Why did the Supreme Court of Canada, in 2009, expressly reaffirm that restrictive covenants in the sale of a business are subject to less scrutiny than other applications of restrictive covenants?
because the vendor typically receives consideration for goodwill
In a recent 2009 ruling, the Supreme Court of Canada found it necessary to direct that judges in lower courts were prohibited from redrafting overly broad non-competition clauses to make them legal and enforceable, stating that such clauses are simply and utterly unenforceable. Why did the Supreme Court find it necessary to invoke this prohibition?
because such clauses improperly bind employees unable to afford litigation costs
What was the intended purpose of the creation and enactment of the Statute of Frauds?
to impede perjury and fraud by documented evidence of specified types of contracts
What is the legal definition of a “guarantee”?
a pledge to pay another’s liability in the event of default of such duty
What had the greatest influence on the early courts in Britain with respect to their inclusion of a provision in the Statute of Frauds requiring contracts that were to be performed after the passage of one year’s time to be evidenced in writing?
to avoid difficulties presented by the passage of time with proving past oral promises
Which of the following is a valid requirement under the federal Secure Electronic Signature Regulations issued in 2005?
to ensure alterations to a document after it was signed can be evidenced
Which of the following would be a valid provision under the various provincial acts dealing with the sale of goods?
If partial payment or acceptance is made by the buyer, an oral contract is enforceable.