• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
wood v. strickland
arkansas students were drinking at school
-unlawfully suspended w/o due process (not told why)
-administrators were knowingly violating the students' rights and were responsible for $ damages
ingraham v. wright
2 students paddled badly felt it was cruel/unsual punishment
-argued they should of had right to be heard first
school supported
-5-4vote in favor of school
bethel v. fraser
fraser gave speech to students to nominate another student for elective office position
-read to 3 teachers and all said not to give
-gave anyway suspended 3 days
-court ruled in favor of fraser b/c school's conduct rule was vague
Brown v. board of edu. topeka
linda brown walked mile to school while white school was 7blks away
-asked NAACP for help to challenge segregation
-ruled that segregation does deprive the minority group of = educational opportunities
cleveland board of edu. v. loudermill
security guard fired b/c he had convicted a felony when he wrote on app. that he had never
-claimed he was not given due process
lamb's chapel v. center moriches union free school district
school district refused 2 requests to use school to show religious-oriented film series on family values/childrearing
-school created limited open forum when allowing groups to use buildings for civic or social purposes
goss v. lopez
nine students suspended in Columbus Ohio Public School System
-claim not given their due process
-Lopez said innocent bystander never given chance to speak
-ruled that any suspension requires notice and a hearing and that young people do not shed constitutional rights at the school house door
mancha v. field museum
2 teachers & 50 7th grade students go to museum
-students explore w/o supervision
-Roberto Mancha beat by white group of kids
-school dist. charged w/ neglect by not providing adequate supervision
-no one could have expected this to happen
milliken v. bradley
(white flight)
ronald bradley filed suit against detriot school system saying it was racially segregated
-it was segregated and district court ordered adoption of desegregation plan
-bused in 53 school districts
-no evidence of any inter-district violation or effect
Tinker v. Des Moines School District
students publicized their objections to the hostilities in Vietnam/support for a truce to wear armbands/fast on dec 16,17, & new year's eve
knew they would be suspended
-granted certiorari
-schools are a place where symbolic speech is protected by 1st/14th amendments
Lee v. Weisman
-middle school principal invited rabbi to speak @ graduation
-father of a student filed for a permanent injunction barring school officials from inviting clergy to speak at ceremonies
-court ruled that this was a violation of the Establishment clause of the 1st amendment
Miranda v. Arizona
in a number of instances, suspects were questioned by police officers, detectives, or attorneys in rooms that cut them off from outside world
-were not given warnings of their rights
-specified the warnings police need to give to suspects
New Jersey v. T.L.O
girl accused of smoking in bathroom of her high school
-was questioned and purse was searched
-pot and other things found
-probable cause
New York Times v. Sullivan
full page ad which alleged that the arrest of MLK jr. for pergury was part of a campaign to destroy king's efforts to integrete public facilities and encourage blacks to vote
-city commissioner filed libel action against newspaper/4 ministers
-1st amendment protects publication of all statements even false ones except when made w/ actual malice
honig v. doe
the stay put provision was supported in this case involving 2 emotionally disturbed students
-an expulsion or suspension for more than 10 days=change in placement
-alternate setting is decided by IEP team
hazelwood v. kuhlmeier
students published 2 articles in paper principal thought were inappropriate
-students sued
- In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that the First Amendment did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular types of student speech
boring v. bunconbe
teacher who did contraversial play
-performed for class;parent complained
-principal said they were not performing; changed mind when certain scenes taken out
-teacher needed plywood
-teacher transferred