• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/35

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

35 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Brokerage

General contractor subs out all work on a project


-not good for owner bc extra cost from each subcontractor's profit


-gen contractor takes managerial role with subcontractors

When to use General Contract Form

When the general contractor has unique skills that should reduce costs of construction

When not to use General Contract Form

-if the owner has construction management capability

General Contract Form

-Only method that gives the owner a firm idea of the project's final cost before the construction phase


-gives clear roles for each party


-minimizes liability for cost overruns and late project delivery

Public General Contract Form

-Public advertisement of upcoming bid


-Sealed bids submitted in designated time, place and manner


-bids opened and read to all in attendance


-contract goes to lowest responsible bidder

General Contracting Disadvantages

-Longer project duration


-no agent/"friendly party" for owner


-small profit margins (contractors cut corners)


-adversarial parties


-inflexible


-more claims likely

Separate Contracts Method

Owner contracts directly with specialty contractors


-owner must be project manager (advisable) or hire a firm to manage the project (management role is outlined in contract)




aka Multiple Prime Contracts Method

Pros of Separate Contracts Method

Profit saved by not having to pay a general contractor

Cons of Separate Contracts Method

-profit saved from lack of general contractor is small


-some permits require a general contractor's license to acquire


-owner assumes greater risk

When to use Separate Contracts Method

-when owner has construction manager or an engineer to administer contracts


-for projects with only a few types of specialty construction

Self Performance Method

aka Force Account Work


The owner does some or all of the work in-house


-no contracts


-owner is the project manager


-design is usually done in-house, or designer plays a minor role

Pros of the Self-Performance Method

-the owner saves money by not paying contractors and not going through the contract/bid process


-sometimes money saved in engineering and inspection (for simpler projects)

Cons of the Self-Performance Method

-Contractors don't like when public entities compete in bids (bc public entities underestimate costs and underbid)


-Outsourcing is seen as more profitable (private sector)

when to use the Self-performance Method

-small projects


-simple projects


-ongoing projects (maintenance)


-when the owner already has the necessary resources

Design-Build Method

aka Design-Construct


aka Turnkey Construction




uses construction firm's expertise in the design phase to make the final product easier to construct


-contractor is responsible for design & construction


-no existing design on which to calculate a bid

Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contract

-used to bid projects to design-build firms


-project scope well-defined




-sometimes paid as the construction/design cost + a fixed fee




Public - owner keeps savings when cost is below GMP


Private - Owner may share savings with the contractor as an incentive for them to control costs



Pros of Design-Build

-fewer changes due to construction-informed design


-owner won't deal with disputes that arise between design & construction


-potentially cheaper


can be 20-30% faster

Cons of Design-Build

-owner has less control


-fewer checks and balances




Public projects


-laws and regulations may restrict the process

When to use design-build

-when owner wants to fast-track project


-large, complex projects


-when project scope is clearly defined before entering a design-build contract

Variations of design-build

design-build-finance


design-build-operate

Professional Construction Management contract method

Owner hires a firm with construction expertise to manage construction on the owner's behalf


-Construction management firm (CM) usually hired before any substantial design or any construction


-compensation arranged between owner and CM


-construction may begin once design is partially complete

Construction Management Firm responsibilities

-CM works for owner's benefit


-sometimes gives owner a GMP (owner could give CM savings under GMP as incentive)


-periodically reviews project design during development


-finds ways to reduce cost & time spent


-NOT responsible for means/methods of construction


-might provide skeleton workforce for general overhead work (cleanup)

When to use Professional Construction Management

-large, complex projects that require construction expertise in the design phase


-flexible projects subject to change design as project evolves (hospitals)


-when owner trusts CM and knows what they need from CM


-projects that need fast-tracking

Construction Management At Risk (CM at Risk)

aka GC/CM


aka CM/GC


a Construction Manager is hired as an independent contractor, and is therefore "at risk"


-CM must compensate owner when construction doesn't satisfy standard of performance for the project


-CM responsible for hiring all sub-contractors and coordinating them


-CM enters project prior to design completion


if Guaranteed Maximum Price used:


-CM must absorb costs that exceed GMP


-owner usually keeps savings if actual costs are under GMP

Contract

agreement between 2 or more parties


enforceable by law




contract breach occurs when a party doesn't comply with the contract terms

Litigation

Taking matters into the hands of the law when conflicts can't be settled amicably

Common Law

based on tradition or accepted practice over extended time




-used to define 'right' and 'wrong'


-not formally documented


-past court cases form a reference on which to judge


-can inform what constitutes a breach of contract

Written Law

Formal, written statutes, laws,


ya know, what it sounds like

Executed Contract

Both parties have fully performed the terms of the contract


- contract not executed until all terms have been completed (project is built and contractor is paid)

Executory Contract

Part(s) of the contract has not been completed


-by one or both parties


-an entirely executory contract (nothing has been done yet) is the easiest to cancel

Bilateral Contract

agreement created by mutual promises made by both parties involved


-each party is 'promiser' and 'promisee'


-most construction contracts are bilateral




ex) contractor agrees to build for owner, owner agrees to pay contractor

Unilateral Contract

Only one party makes a promise, and the other exchanges something else


ex) subcontractor offers general contractor railroad ties for a certain price, and the general contractor sends the sub the agreed amount of money for the railroad ties

Express Contract

-clear, concise, definite terms (verbal or written)

Implied Contract

-Terms are not clearly stated, but established through inference and deduction




-facts and circumstances are implied from the actions of both parties

Joint Arrangement

individuals are 'joined' as one party in a contractual agreement


-if one individual is released from the agreement, then all individuals are released




ex) landowners with adjacent properties combine their land to sell it


if there's a disagreement with the real estate agent, then all the individual landowners would be sued as one entity