Health Promotion

Front 1

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS A CRITERION FOR A GOOD EVALUATION?

Back 1

ALL OF THE ABOVE

Front 2

AN EFFECT EVALUATION WAS BEING CONDUCTED OF A CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CVD) PREVENTION PROGRAM. THE PROGRAM TARGETED CHOLESTEROL CONSUMPTION AND EXERCISE. THE EVALUATION QUESTION WAS " DID LOWERING CHOLESTEROL INTAKE AND INCREASING EXERCISE DECREASE CVD?"

Back 2

DEPENDENT VARIABLE: CVD

INDEPENDENT VARIABLE: CHOLESTEROL & EXERCISE

Front 3

CHOLESTEROL AND EXERCISE ARE ALSO CONSIDERED:

Back 3

CAUSAL FACTORS

Front 4

TECHNIQUES USED TO COLLECT DATA ARE THE:

Back 4

METHODS

Front 5

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES WILL HELP TO VALIDATE A QUESTIONNAIRE?

Back 5

ALL OF THE ABOVE

Front 6

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING IS NOT AN EXAMPLE OF A PRIMARY DATA SOURCE?

Back 6

DEATH CERTIFICATE

Front 7

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING REASONS EXPLAINS WHY DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS ARE IMPORTANT IN AN ANALYSIS PLAN?

Back 7

ALL OF THE ABOVE

Front 8

THIS METHOD USES TEXT AS THE DATA

Back 8

ARCHIVAL DATA

Front 9

THIS METHOD USES MULTIPLE SOURCES OF DATA

Back 9

CASE STUDY

Front 10

THE METHODOLOGY FOR THIS TYPE OF STUDY VARIES WIDELY FROM NON-PARTICIPATING APPROACHES LIKE COLLECTING DATA BEHIND A ONE-WAY MIRROR TO PARTICIPATORY APPROACHES SUCH AS COLLECTING DATA AS A MEMBER OF THE TARGET AUDIENCE.

Back 10

OBSERVATION

Front 11

USING THIS METHOD ALLOWS THE ELEVATOR TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE GROUP DYNAMIC THAT CAN LEAD TO DISCUSSIONS AND REVELATIONS OF NEW INFORMATION

Back 11

FOCUS GROUP

Front 12

A LIMITATION OF THIS METHOD IS THAT NOT ALL DOCUMENTS AND KEY INFORMANTS MAY BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE ELEVATOR

Back 12

CASE STUDY

Front 13

USING THIS METHOD ALLOWS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF CAUSE AND EFFECT

Back 13

OBSERVATION

Front 14

OFTEN USES THE QUESTIONS, "WHAT SUGGESTIONS DO YOU HAVE?"

Back 14

SURGERY WITH OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS

Front 15

WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING ISSUES IS/ARE INHERENT IN QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS?

Back 15

ALL OF THE ABOVE

Front 16

PRE-TEST

Back 16

ANY TIME BEFORE RECEIVING THE PROGRAM INTERVENTION

Front 17

PRO-TEST

Back 17

ANY TIME AFTER RECEIVING THE PROGRAM INTERVENTION BASED ON THE MEASURES BEING USED TO QUANTIFY THE PROGRAM EFFECT

Front 18

EXTERNAL VALIDITY

Back 18

FLAWS ARE CATEGORIZED BASED ON IF THEY AFFECT THE ABILITY TO GENERALIZE THE FINDINGS TO OTHER POPULATIONS

Front 19

INTERNAL VALIDITY

Back 19

FLAWS BASED ON IF THEY AFFECT THE ABILITY TO SAY THAT THE INTERVENTION MADE A DIFFERENCE

Front 20

BIAS

Back 20

THE EXTENT TO WHICH THE DESIGN IS FLAWED AND THEREFORE MORE LIKELY TO LEAD TO AN INACCURATE CONCLUSION ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE HEALTH PROGRAM

Front 21

BASED ON A ONE GROUP PRE-POST EVALUATION DESIGN OF AN ASTHMA INTERVENTION PROGRAM, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT 50% OF PARTICIPANTS EXPERIENCED A DECREASE IN VISITS TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM. THE INVESTIGATORS COULD CONCLUDE THAT THE DECREASE IN ER VISITS WAS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE INTERVENTION

Back 21

TRUE

Front 22

ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS DO NOT APPLY TO PROGRAM EVALUATIONS

Back 22

FALSE

Front 23

SIMILARLY TO QUANTITATIVE METHODS, SAMPLING FOR QUALITATIVE METHODS IS IDEAL WITH RANDOM SAMPLING

Back 23

FALSE

Front 24

RELIABILITY IS GENERALLY NOT ISSUE WITH SECONDARY DATA

Back 24

FALSE

Front 25

OUTLIERS SHOULD ALWAYS BE EXCLUDED

Back 25

FALSE