Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Group leaders are most beneficial when they replicate common factors in individual therapy |
Burlingame, MacKenzie & Strauss, 2004 |
|
|
Most theories of change develop in individual, applying them to group may be problematic |
Burlingame, MacKenzie & Strauss, 2004 |
|
|
Specific benefits of group |
Yalom, 2005 Social learning Social support Improving social networks Reducing relapse for clients with recurring issues Adding group therapy to treatment of women who are survivors of childhood sexual abuse |
|
|
When are member likely to be satisfied with their group? |
Yalom, 2005 Getting needs met Enjoy other group members Enjoy participating in group task Have pride in group |
|
|
Leaders should integrate change agents into group instead of conducting individual therapy in group |
Burlingame, MacKenzie & Strauss, 2004 |
|
|
Yalom, 2005 inclusion criteria |
Motivation Problems in interpersonal domain Good for those who do not do well in individual |
|
|
Yalom, 2005 exclusion criteria |
Cannot participate in group task Will not examine self in relation to others Cannot accept responsibility Low psychological mindedness Clients in the middle of crisis are better served in problem specific group |
|
|
Cohesion predicts outcome |
Burlingame, Fuhriman & Johnson, 2001 |
|
|
6 predictive factors of group outcome |
Burlingame, Fuhriman & Johnson, 2001 Pregroup preparation Early group structure Leader interaction Feedback Leader modeling Member emotional expression |
|
|
Absolute efficacy if group |
Burlingame, Fuhriman & Misier, 2003 Meta analysis of 111 studies Effect size us .58 Average group member better off than 72% of non treated controls |
|
|
Is individual ever better than group |
Burlingame, MacKenzie & Strauss, 2004 Yes when groups are not using process principles |
|
|
Yalom, 2005 11 therapeutic factors |
Installation of hope Universallity Imparting information Altruism Development of socializing techniques Imitative behavior Interpersonal learning Corrective emotional experience Group as social microcosm Group cohesiveness Catharsis Existential factors |
|
|
Stages of group Shapiro, Peltz & Bernadett-Shapiro, 1998 |
Preparation Transition Treatment/Working Termination |
|
|
2 dimensions of cohesion |
Burlingame, Theobald, & Alonso, 2011 Structure and quality |
|
|
Dodo bird hypothesis for group treatments |
Lieberman, Yalom & Miles, 1973 |
|
|
Relative efficacy of group vs individual? |
Smith, Glass & Miller, 1980 Mode of treatment doesn't matter |
|
|
Dosh et al., 1983; Neitzel et al., 1987 findings about efficacy of group vs individual |
Differential effect size in favor of individual Criticized for not being completely random assignment |
|
|
Tuckman, 1965 stages of group |
Forming Storming Norming Performing Adjourning |
