• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/12

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

12 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What are the types of Future Interests?
A. Vested remainder - Indefeasibly VR, VR subject to total divestment, VR subject to open
B. Contingent remainder
C. Executory interest
Vested means...
Both created in an ascertained person AND is not subject to a condition precedent
Indefeasibly Vested Remainder
"To A for life, remainder to B"
The holder of this remainder is certain to acquire an estate in the future with no conditions attached.
Vested Remainder Subject to Total Divestment
"To A for life, remainder to B, provided however, that if B dies under the age of 25, to C."
The remainder man exists and his right to possession could be cut short because of a condition subsequent
Vested Remainder Subject to Open
"To A for life, then to B's children." (A is alive and B has 2 children)
Remainder is vested in a group of takers where at least one is qualified to take. A class closes whenever any member can demand possession.
Contingent Remainder means...
Created in an unascertained person OR is subject to a condition precedent
A condition precedent must be satisfied before the remainderman has a right to possession.
Condition Precedent vs. Condition Subsequent

1
O conveys "to A for life, then to B and his heirs IF B marries C." (B's remainder is contingent because he must marry C before he can take possession.
O conveys "to A for life, then to B and his heirs if B marries C, otherwise to D and his heirs." B&D = Alt CR
Condition Precedent vs. Condition Subsequent

2
Compare the previous examples to:
O conveys "to A for life, then to B and his heirs; but if B marries C, then to D and his heirs." (B has a vested remainder subject to divestment by D's executory interest...because there is no cone precedent)
Rule of Destructibility

Contingent remainders are destroyed if not vested at time of termination of preceding estate
"To A for life, remainder to A's children who reach 21"
If A has no children @ 21, reverts to grantor.
Abolished in most states
Modern Result: Property reverts to grantor; A's children have a springing executory interest
Rule in Shelley's Case
(Rule Against Remainders in Grantee's Heirs)

A remainder in a life tenant-grantee's heirs is deemed to be in the life tenant herself
"To A for life, then to A's heirs."
A has a fee simple
Abolished in most states
Modern Result: A's heirs have a contingent remainder
Doctrine of Worthier Title
(Rule Against Remainders in Grantor's Heirs)

A remainder in the grantor's heirs is ineffective, so grantor has a reversion
"To A for life, then to my heirs at law."
A has a life estate; grantor has a reversion.
Generally treated as rule of construction.
Modern result: Grantor's heirs have a contingent remainder.
Executory Interest is...
Future interest created in a 3rd party, which is not a remainder (defeasible fees)
Shifting = "To A, but if A uses the land for nonresidential purpose, then to B"
Springing = O conveys "To A, if and when she marries"