• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/140

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

140 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
4 Sources of American Law
1. Constitutional Law
2. Statutory Law
3.Administrative Law
4. Common Law
Constitutional law
Fundamental laws from state and federal constitution that establish authority for fovernment and organize the government
Statutory Law
laws set forth by legislative bodies
Administrative Law
laws set forth by an administrative agency
Common Law
evolving set of laws established by precedent
Stare decisis
common law principle by which precedents within jurisdiction become binding
Example of common law
roe v. wade: abortion rights
brown v. board of education: separate but equal not legal
ethics
right and wrong behavior in society
business ethics
right and wrong behavior in business
minimum standard/ moral minimum
law is the absolute minimum standard for ethical behavior in business
Categorical Imperative
concept developed by Immanual Kant as an ethical guideline for behavior
Outcome based Ethics
1. concerned with society as an ethical unit
2. measure outcomes in goods and bads
3. cost benefit analysis
4. ends justify the means
Duty based ethics
1. individual
2. categorical imperative
3. rights and duties
4. the means will never justify the end`
Theories which business ethics is based
1. Revealed Ethics
2. Kantian Ethics (categorical imperative)
3. Principle of Rights
Revealed ethics
absolute to believers, elements of compassion
Principles of Rights
all individuals have rights and rights have corresponding duties
ADR
alternative dispute resolution
1. Negotiation
2. Mediation
3. Arbritration
-binding
-non-binding
Mediation
arites resolve dispute among themselves with help of nuetral 3rd party
Abritration
neutral 3rd party resolves a disprute
Non binding arbritration
parties dont have to agree with arbritrator
Binding Arbritration
parties have to agree with arbritrator
negotiation
parties resolved dispute among themselves
Law
enforceable rules governing society
Business Law
enforceable rules governing business
Trial Court
Facts and Law
1. Judge
2. Jury
3. Defendant
4. Plaintiff
Appellate Court
Law only (no jury/evidence)
1.Judge
2. Plaintiff
3. Defendant
Judge
enforces the law
Jury
weigh the facts and decide verdict
Plaintiff
person bringing forth the legal action
Defendant
person responding to the legal action
Federal Matters
immigration, tax, bankruptcy (feds only interested in big crimes)
State Matters
family and probate
tort
wrong against an individual
crime
wrong against society
2 categories of torts
Intentional and Unintentional
Intentional Torts
Property
Person
Unintentional torts
Tort of Negligence
Negligence
Accidental harm caused by breach of duty
What is the purpose of Tort Law
To right a wrong
Reasonable Person's standard
hypothetical standard against which person's behavior in society is measured
4 qualities of a reasonable person
1. Careful
2. Conscientious
3. Dispassionate
4. Honest
careful person
aware of surroundings and acts appropriately given their environment
Conscientious person
pays attention to their own actions and acts appropriately given their activity
Dispassionate person
places head before heart
Honest person
acts in accordance with the law and is free of deceit
Duty of Care
Party's obligation to behave reasonably in society
4 Questions of Negligence
1. Did defendant owe plaintiff duty of care?
2. Did defendant breach duty of care?
3. Was plaintiff harmed?
4. Was defendants ;breach the proximate cause of plaintiff's harm
defense against a tort
reason why a defendant is not liable
Intellectual property
product of the creative process
3 Different groups of intellectual property
1. patents: software
2. copyright: photo
3. trademark: logo
patent
exclusive right granted by government over and organizations design or process
copyrights
exclusive right granted by governent to the creator of writings, art and other similar property
trademark
exclusive right granted by government to logos, slogans and other similar property of commercial value
Differences between crimes and torts
1. Crime
-wrong against society
-beyond a reasonable doubt
- guilty/not guilty
($$, jail, death: losses of liberty)

Tort:
-wrong against individual
-preponderance of evidence
-liable or not liable
(remedies at law/equity)
Beyond a reasonable doubt (Crime)
burdern of proof in a criminal action by which the jury finds that there is no reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty
Preponderance of Evidence
(Tort)
burden of proof in a civil action by which the jury concludes that it is more likley than not that the defendant is liable
2 elements of a crime
mens rea: wrongful state of mind
actus reas: overt illegal act
4 elements of a contract
1. Agreement
2. Consideration
3. Capacity
4. Legality
Agreement
offer and acceptance among parties
Consideration
that value which obligates the performance of a duty
Capacity
the ability to agree
Legality
the lawfullness of that purpose and form of a contract
Contract
enforceable agreement
Types of Contracts
unilateral/bilateral
expressed/implied
formal/informal
Unilateral and Bilateral Contract
Unilateral: value for a performance
Bilateral: value for a value
Formal and Informal Contract
Formal: contract which requires a special form
Informal: contract which doesnt require a special form
Implied and Expressed Contract
Implied: terms are understood
Expressed: terms are stated
3rd party incidental beneficiaries
incedentially benefit was not reason contract was formed
3rd party intended beneficiary
intended by design to benefit from the contracts
3rd party
a person involved in a contract but not a party to the agreement
Article 2 of UCC
Sale of Goods
Article 2a of UCC
Lease of goods
Uniform Commercial Code
set of model laws which have been adopted in part or in whole by all 50 states whose purpose is to increase trade
UCC is good because
1. reduced uncertainty
2. increases transparency of the law
3. protects consumers by placing certain burdens on merchants
4. simplifies trade
Duty of seller
tender conforming goods
Duty of buyer
accept and pay for conforming goods
Seller's Breach
-not tender
-send non-conforming goods
Buyer's Breach
-not accept
-not pay
Seller's Breach & Buyer's Remedies
Goods in:
Seller's possession
-recover
-s.p

Buyer possession
-damages
-s.p

In transit
-damages
s.p
Buyer's Breach & Seller's Remedies
Goods in:
Sellers, Buyers, In Transit Possesion
-damages
-s.p
Product Liability
strict liability applied to goods
Defense against product liability
reason why a merchant is not liable for a defective product
Implied warranty of title
understood guarantee that seller may transfer rights
Implied warranty of merchant ability
goods are reasonably fit for general purpose for which intended
implied warranty of fitness for a particular use
understood guarantee that a good will be reasonably fit for the specific performance specified by a buyer
expressed warranty
stated guarantee
limited warranty
limit sellers responsiblity or obligation
Implied warranty of title
understood guarantee that seller may transfer rights
Implied warranty of merchant ability
goods are reasonably fit for general purpose for which intended
implied warranty of fitness for a particular use
understood guarantee that a good will be reasonably fit for the specific performance specified by a buyer
expressed warranty
stated guarantee
limited warranty
limit sellers responsiblity or obligation
strict liability
liability without breach of duty
5 elements of product liability
1. seller is a merchant
2. goods must be in defective condition when bought/sold
3. product must be unreasonably dangerous
4. was the plaintiff harmed
5. was the defect by the defendant proximate cause of plaintiff's harm
Article 3 of UCC
Negotiable Instruments
Negotiable Instruments
a written unconditional order or promise to pay an exact amount of money to a payee/ bearer payable upon demand signed by a drawor/maker
Negotiable Instruments
Orders to Pay:
-check
-draft

Promises to pay:
-promisory notes
-certificates of deposit
promisory note
signed writing making unconditional promise to pay a bearer upon demand signed by a maker
Certificate of Deposits (CD)
promise to pay depositer a certain amount
Cashier's Check
only 2 parties are involved, same as cash
Certified Check
certified to payee that drawer has ready funds
bankruptcy
federal statutes that protect debtors from lenders
-discharges debtors from contractual duty
What is the purpose of bankruptcy
let people continue to take risk
Chapter 7 bankruptcy
liquidation bankruptcy, either individual/corporation
-bankruptcy trustee calculates assets and debts, liquidate assets and pay off debts
Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
reorganization or restructuring bankruptcy, only available to corporations
-trustee reorganizes debt
Chapter 13
individual debt repayment plan
-trustee orders payment plans
5 Categories of Crimes
Violent
Property
Public Order
White Collar
Organized
probable cause
government's reasonable belief based on evidence that wrongdoing has occured, will occur or is occuring
exclusionary rule
prevents illegally obtained evidence from being used in the court of law
3 common law requirements of an offer
communicated to the offeree
reasonable specificity
objective intent
privity of contract
contracts are just between the parties
contracts that must be in written form
land
sale of goods valued over $500
take more than 1 year to fulfill
marriage
collateral promises
what is the most common way for a duty to be discharged
performance
specific performance SP
equitable remedy when first party seeks a court order for a second party to perform their duty
3 different types of crimes
felony
misdemeanor
petty
equitable principles and maxims
common law philosophies that introduce fairness and justice
Justice Theory questions
1. Is it Legal?
2. Is it balanced?
3. Who are the winner's and losers?
4. How does it make me feel about myself?
Discovery
the process by which litigates gather information and evidence from one another
state jurisdiction
state may assert jurisdiction over property within its border
Inrem
property jurisdiction
Inpersonam
person "minimum contact"
est. by residence or significant activity
Judicial review
Common Law Principle by which court interprets the law
example of statutory law
car insurance
long arm statute
state asserts jurisdiction over a non citizen
standing to sue
in order to sue another party plaintiff must have suffered a loss at stake
Example of constitutional law
Bill of rights
Example of administrative law
nutritional facts
Marbury v Madison
1803 established judicial review
J. Adams: 2nd president of US
T. Jefferson: defeated Adams and was 3rd president of US
J. Marshall:Adam's sec. of state and US SC Justice
W. Marbury: strongly involved in politics supported Adams
domain name
discreet location on the web- a url
Constitutional Safeguards to a crime
probable cause
exclusionary rule
agreement
offer and acceptance among parties
lein
reduction in owner's rights
justifiable reliance
defense based on elements
proximate cause
direct unintervened cause of an outcome
compensetory damages
those losses resulting directly from a breach of duty
meta tags
information both visible and invisisble embedded in the url
capacity
parties ability to enter into an agreement
3 exceptions to capacity
1. intoxication
2. MI
3. infancy
disaffirmance
process by which a minor can avoid a contractual duty
legality requirements
1. must NOT be contrary to statute
2. contrary to public policy