Evidence - Relevancy And Character Evidence

Front 1

What are the three steps of Relevance?
(LCS)

Back 1

1- Logical?
2- Competent?
3- Prejudicial?

Front 2

What is brick wall rule?

Back 2

Sufficiency ≠ Relevancy

Front 3

IDVOX - character ev

Back 3

Issue
Defendant
Victim (no specific)
Other Crime
X-exam

Front 4

When can specific acts of ∆ be questioned in a criminal case?

Back 4

(A) Quizzing Character Ws
(B) When Character is issue
(C) When Vic's character comes into question

Front 5

Past Bad Character - MIMIC

Back 5

Motive
Intent
Mistake (abscence of)
ID
Common Plan or Scheme

Front 6

To use bad character one must use
Uniqueness
__________
__________

Back 6

To use bad character one must use
Uniqueness
Implication
Sufficiency

Front 7

HS STOPS (circumstantial evidence)

Back 7

Habit
Sim happenings

Subsequent Precautions
Trade
Offers to compromise
Pleas
Sex

Front 8

Habit requirements for circumstantial evidence

(Hs stops)

Back 8

Habit evidence = Repetitive response to stimulus. Business practices can be intro'd as habit.

Front 9

Subsequent Precautions

(hS stops)

Back 9

Admissible-
• Ownership
• Control
• Feasibility of precautionary methods if disputed
• Impeachment

INADMISSIBLE-
• Negilgence
• Culpability
• Defect/need for warning

Front 10

Offers in Compromise

(hs stOps)

Back 10

Offers of crompromise-
inadmissible except

Bias
Intentional Delay
non-contemplation of compromise

Front 11

When are guilty pleas introducible?

Back 11

Statements from pleas are introcible under perjury cases or
when it is already intro'd

Front 12

Vic's sexual Conduct when and how can it be intro'd

Back 12

(a) consent w/ ∆
(b) another person is source
(c) no specifics

Front 13

∆'s sexual conduct

Back 13

generally admissible