Related Essays

  • Proving Criminal Conspiracy Essay

    Proving criminal conspiracy is often difficult because there is little physical evidence of agreement between persons if there is no contract. The criminals ...

  • Evidence Of Lying In Court

    The first important thing that investigators should bring when they testify in court is evidence. Before you enter a court room, you must be prepared about w...

  • Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, And Investigation By Andrea Campbell

    When it comes to criminal trials, there are many important pieces of evidence. Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation by Andrea Campbell, expla...

  • Career Essay: How To Become A Prosecutor

    There are many different kinds of evidence such as reviewing legal documents, interview witnesses, and collect physical evidence (Echaore-Mcdavid Law and th...

  • Federal Rules Of Evidence Analysis

    The outcomes of a majority of crime scene investigations, which result in the prosecution of a suspect, is dependent upon the tenacity and admissibility of e...

  • Criminal Case Process

    Evidence can be presented and witnesses will testify in order to show that there is sufficient proof to charge the defendant with the crime and allow the cas...

  • Loss Of Evidence In A Criminal Trial

    Chapter 1: Introduction What is evidence? Evidence is used in every case to prove or disprove an alleged fact. Evidence is used in many different forms, like...

  • Briscoe V. Washington Case Study

    In 2004 The United States Supreme Court’s decision from Crawford v. Washington reformulated the standard for determining the admission of hearsay argument...

  • Dishonesty In Law Enforcement Essay

    Marland (1963) and Giglio v. United States (1972), the Supreme Court has imposed rulings that all exculpatory evidence must be disclosed and that the defenda...

  • Categories Of Evidence In Criminal Trial

    In my opinion the most important type of evidence is real evidence as this what can make or break a case. For example the eye witness testimony is great but ...

  • Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/10

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

10 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
The 6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him.
Bourjaily v. United States
Facts: D charged with conspiring to distribute cocaine.
Rule: Under 801(d)(2)(E) the prosecutor must 1st establish that there was a conspiracy by a preponderance of the evidence under 104(a).
Whorton v. Bockting
Crawford has no retroactive force. Nontestimonial statements are only hearsay issues.
FRE 403
Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the damage of unfair prejudice.
FRE 404(b)
Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or act is NOT admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. May be admissible to prove other things such as motive, intent, knowledge, ID.
The 6th Amendment
In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him.
Bourjaily v. United States
Facts: D charged with conspiring to distribute cocaine.
Rule: Under 801(d)(2)(E) the prosecutor must 1st establish that there was a conspiracy by a preponderance of the evidence under 104(a).
Whorton v. Bockting
Crawford has no retroactive force. Nontestimonial statements are only hearsay issues.
FRE 403
Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the damage of unfair prejudice.
FRE 404(b)
Evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or act is NOT admissible to prove the character of a person in order to show action in conformity therewith. May be admissible to prove other things such as motive, intent, knowledge, ID.