Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
14 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Definition of groups
|
Appropriate definition, classification and measurment of expsure. Analogous to randomization in CT
|
|
Examples of exposure groups
|
Genetics
Age Demographics Lifestyle Geographoc Environmental Disease Meds Devices Education Policies |
|
6 - Exposure checklist
|
1) External E-
2) Internal E- 3) Zero time 4) Classification 5) Measurement 6) Change w\ follow-up |
|
Internal E-
|
cohort is single group of subjects with uniform procedures.
Classification (E+ or E-) done at same time (t0). Can be matched or entire E- |
|
Increasing comparability of E- group
|
try and restrict E- to subjects most similar to E+ (some covariate that makes them very similar to E+)
|
|
Using alternative exposure for E-
|
careful of counfounding. Can show erranous protective effect. Should try and use plocebo or no exposure.
|
|
Temporal E- comparisons: Natural crossover
|
uses person time of exposure compared to person time of unexposed.
t0 should be at initial intervention..not follow/up |
|
External E-
|
Group from a different population.
Different procedures to identify and collect data. |
|
3 Fundamental weakness of E-
|
1)Effect of different procedures cannot be separated from the effect of E.
2)Entire group risk of D may be different (healthy worker effect) 3)Usually E+ data more complete |
|
External E - Comparison at Different institutions
|
Must take care that patients are treated exactly the same.
|
|
External E: Control group membership influenced by D
|
E- Should have same chance of getting exposure an getting outcome as E+
|
|
Zero time
|
inception cohort - patients should be identified at an early and unambiguous point in the course of their disease. It is a challege for E-
|
|
Reference category
|
reference group with which others are compares in calculating measured effect (often lowest quintile of exposure).
|
|
3 ways to Constructing Categories
|
1)Intrinsically meaningful divisions
2)Percentiles (if no a priori H) 3)Don't torture the data |