• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/16

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

16 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969

Requires employers to take out insurance against claims by employees

Wilsons & Clyde Coal Co Ltd v English

Employers must take reasonable steps to provide:


1) Competent staff


2) Adequate material


3) A proper system of work and supervision

Latimer v AEC Ltd

Employers have a duty to take reasonable steps to provide a safe place of work

Woodland v Essex

A local education authority owes a non-delegable duty of care to a pupil of a school for which it is responsible

Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Co Ltd

The duty to provide competent staff doesn't arise merely from the fact that a worker is incompetent, arises where an employer knows/ought to know about the risk a particular worker is posing to fellow workers

Waters v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis

The risk being posed by the worker could be of psychological as was physical harm

Employer's Liability (Defective Equipment) Act 1969

Employee doesn't need to identify manufacturer of defective equipment supplied by employer, can sue employer directly. Only needs to establish:


1) Fault on the part of someone


2) Causation

General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas

Duty to provide a safe system of work applies regardless of where the employees are at work, ie applies to where they are sent also

Walker v Northumberland County Council

Duty to provide a safe system of work can extend to an employee who has suffered stress as a result of his work

Hatton v Sutherland

'Threshold question' to determine whether duty arises was whether injury to health through stress at work was reasonably foreseeable.


1) Question nature and extent of work


2) Signs from the employee

Paris v Stepney Borough Council

To be in breach of duty, the risk must be known to the defendant

Caswell v Powell Duffryn Associated Collieries

(Re employee contributory negligence) The care to be expected of the claimant in the circumstances will vary with the circumstances.

Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance

An employment contract would exist if the following were satisfied:


1) Agreement of exchange of wage/remuneration in exchange for provision of services


2) Employers agree to be under control of another person to sufficient degree to make that person an employer


3) The other provisions of the contract are consistent with its being a contract of service

Lister and others v Hesley Hall Ltd

An employer can be vicariously liable for an intentional wrongful act committed purely for an employee's benefit where there is a sufficient connection between the work he had been employed to do and the acts in question

Joel v Morison

If an employee is acting outside his course of employment when he commits a tort, he is often said to be 'on a frolic of his own'

Lister v Romford Ice & Cold Storage Co Ltd

Employer has a right at common law to claim an indemnity (ie its full loss) from the employee who actually committed the tort