• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/9

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

9 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Inducement of Breach of Contract

"an actionable wrong is committed by one who intentionally and without lawful justification induces or procures someone to break a contract made by him with another, if damage has resulted to that other, provided that the contract creates contractual relations recognised by law"




- defender is only liable if the third party breaks their contract with the pursuer as a consequence of their acts

5 characteristics of INDUCEMENT as spelled out in GLOBAL RESOURCES GROUP V MACKAY

1. breach of contract must actually take place, otherwise there is insufficient ground for action.




2. the defender must know their actions will result in inducement. Recklessness is not enough unless the defender turned a wilful blind eye to the terms of the contract.




3. intent to induce a breach of contract, either as a means or an end. Not enough that it is a foreseeable consequence.




4. defender's actions must induce the breach of contract through persuasion, encouragement or assistance. Merely allowing a breach to happen is insufficient.




5. A defence of justification is available if it is justified - i.e. inducing female artistes to break contracts of employment in order to obtain better wages and escape prostitution.

Remedies for Inducement of Breach of Contract.

Damages

Intentional Infliction of Harm by Unlawful Means


DEFINING RULES

1. Defender must use unlawful means against third party (OBG Ltd v Allan) (could add more)


2. Must be an intention to harm the pursuer - it does not have to be the predominant motive, merely a motive.


3. Defence of justification might be possible (no direct authority)



Intentional Infliction of Harm by Unlawful means


REMEDIES

Damages

Conspiracy


DEFINING RULES

1. Must be more than one actor


2. Intent to harm pursuer


3. Could be either lawful means conspiracy or unlawful means conspiracy

Conspiracy


LAWFUL MEANS

- when the act would not be actionable against a sole individual or against statute




- action only possible if the primary motive of the conspirators is to cause harm to the Pursuer





Conspiracy


UNLAWFUL MEANS

- when the act would be actionable against a sole individual (i.e. breach of contract/delict) or if unlawful but not actionable in the aforementioned manner (i.e. breach of statute)




- must prove motive of Defender is to harm Pursuer




- possible to use intention of gain as evidence of desire to harm interests of pursuer in cases were in a price fixing cartel





Remedy


Conspiracy (unlawful means)

Damages