Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
48 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Resources are scarce
|
You can’t have everything you want
True for an individual True for an economy Resource scarcity necessitates choice We must make tradeoffs |
|
Production Possibility Frontier
|
Illustrates
Scarcity Opportunity Cost Depicts maximum attainable combinations of goods, given resources and knowledge |
|
The Circular Flow
|
Model illustrates
Two kinds of flows: “real” things and money Two kinds of markets: “factors of production” and goods |
|
In factor markets
|
firms are buyers and households and other owners of inputs are sellers
Payments for factors provide income for buying goods, which provide revenue for buying factors… Can be multiple stages, as some firms sell “intermediate goods Money flows facilitate a system of trade that makes all of us immensely better off |
|
Positive statements
|
about what is, how the world works
“An increase in the minimum wage reduces employment among low-wage workers” “An increase in government spending increases GDP with a multiplier of 1.6” “An increase in the minimum wage reduces employment among low-wage workers” “An increase in government spending increases GDP with a multiplier of 1.6” These statements are not necessarily true, and may be very hard to verify, but they are at least potentially “testable” As scientists, economists aim to test hypotheses, and thereby improve understanding of the world |
|
Normative statements
|
about what should be, involve value judgments
“We should increase the minimum wage to $10/hour” “We should enact a tax-financed system of universal health coverage” |
|
Situations where an association may not reflect causation
|
Omitted variables
Reverse causality |
|
Market
|
Group of buyers and sellers exchanging a particular good or service
|
|
Market cont.
|
Broader than a particular geographic location
Often boundaries of a market (geographic and nature of product) are rather fuzzy |
|
Demand
|
Relationship between quantity of a good that consumers are willing and able to buy and all of the factors that influence it
|
|
Demand is ?
|
the relationship, Quantity demanded is a number, Q(P)
|
|
Demand Schedule is ?
|
a table relating quantity demanded to price, other things held constant
|
|
Demand Curve is ?
|
a graphic representation of demand schedule
|
|
Q^D =
|
f(p, x, y, z,…)
|
|
Demand curve: shifts and movements along
|
If something changes other than price that affects demand, the demand curve shifts (“change in demand”)
If only price changes, move along the demand curve (“change in quantity demanded”) |
|
Supply
|
Relationship between quantity of a good that sellers are willing and able to sell and all of the factors that influence it
Usually focus on response of quantity to price, other things equal (supply curve) |
|
As with demand…
|
If something changes other than price that affects supply, the supply curve shifts (“change in supply”)
If only price changes, move along the supply curve (“change in quantity supplied”) |
|
Market supply is horizontal sum of individual firm supplies
|
If firms enter market, market supply increases (shifts right)
If firms leave market, market supply decreases (shifts left) |
|
Market equilibrium
|
At this price, buyers buying quantity they want, sellers selling quantity they want
No one could be better off by doing something different No tendency for change |
|
Why does price move toward equilibrium?
|
If higher, excess supply (surplus), sellers will reduce price
If lower, excess demand (shortage), sellers will increase price Only at the equilibrium does Qd = Qs,no tendency for change |
|
Demand and Supply are relationships between price and quantity (ceteris paribus)
|
Price and quantity demanded are negatively related (demand slopes down)
Price and quantity supplied are usually positively related (supply slopes up) |
|
“Economic Surplus”
|
is a way of putting a number on gains from trading in markets, or inefficiencies from interference
|
|
Consumer Surplus
|
The difference between what you pay and your maximum “willingness to pay”
|
|
Producer Surplus
|
The difference between what you sell for and the minimum you were willing to sell for (your “cost”)
|
|
If individuals vary in “willingness to pay,” market demand looks like ?
|
stairsteps
|
|
If many buyers with different values, demand looks ?
|
smooth
|
|
CS at market price is ?
|
area under demand but above price
|
|
What happens to CS if the price rises?
|
Those who still buy lose amount of price increase
Those who no longer buy lose CS at the old price |
|
If many sellers with different values, supply looks?
|
smooth
|
|
PS at market price is ?
|
area below price but above supply curve
|
|
What happens to PS if the price rises?
|
Those who still sell gain amount of price increase
Those who now sell gain some PS |
|
Starting from market equilibrium, suppose we change how goods are allocated
Shift a unit from a buyer to a non-buyer Shift a unit from a seller to a non-seller Change the quantity exchanged |
Claim: any of these changes would reduce total surplus
|
|
Two main forms of interfering with market?
|
Ceiling (maximum price)
Floor (minimum price) |
|
Consequences of a price ceiling
|
If above equilibrium, nonbinding, no effect
If below, creates a shortage Available supply must be “rationed” in some way Inefficient, in several ways Allocation among consumers Wasted resources Inefficiently low quality Incentives to evade controls Black market Benefits (some) renters at the expense of landlords. Harms other potential renters who can’t find a place |
|
Price floors
|
Minimum wage an important example
Also used in agriculture (price supports), usually coupled with other policies |
|
Consequences of a price floor
|
If below equilibrium, nonbinding, no effect
If above, creates a surplus (excess supply) Not all who want to sell will be able to (unless government buys surplus) Inefficient Beneficial trades are missed Wasted resources |
|
Consequences of a price floor
|
Benefits some low-skilled workers at the expense of others (and of consumers)
|
|
Quantity controls
|
Another way of interfering with the market is to control the quantity rather than the price
One way to do that is to require a license to do something, and limit the number of licenses A common example in economics is taxicabs in NYC Unless there is a good reason for the quantity restriction, it will create an inefficiency (deadweight loss) If the “license” can be sold, market will determine its value |
|
elasticity
|
The concept economists use to measure responsiveness
|
|
most common example of elasticity is ?
|
price elasticity of demand
|
|
Basic definition of elasticity
|
(%change in Q)/(% change in P)
|
|
Midpoint method
|
%change in X = 100 • (change in X)/(avg value of X)
So by midpoint method, elasticity = {(change in Q)/[(Q1 + Q2)/2]} / {(change in P)/[(P1 + P2)/2]} In our example: (.4/1.8) (1/3.5) = 0.78 |
|
Total revenue
|
P x Q
|
|
Revenue increases if ?
|
%change in Q smaller than % change in P --> elasticity < 1 (inelastic)
|
|
Revenue decreases if?
|
%change in Q larger than % change in P ---> elasticity > 1 (elastic)
|
|
revenue stays the same if?
|
elasticity = 1 (unit elastic)
|
|
Other Demand Elasticities
|
Generically: (% in Q)/(% in X)
Income (% in Q)/(% in Income) Negative (inferior) Positive (normal) > 1 (luxury) Cross-Price (% in QX)/(% in PY) Positive (substitutes) Negative (complements) |
|
Supply Elasticity
|
(% in Q)/(% in P), along supply curve
Positive as long as supply slopes up Flatter curve is more elastic (as with demand) Relatively more elastic when… |