• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/362

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

362 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Lawn salons
student meetings to discuss political issues (mainly economic concerns)
President of China during Tiananmen
Deng Xiaoping
CCP
Chinese Communist Party, Xiaoping’s party, tried to stimulate economic development by permitting limited private enterprise
China Financial crises in late 1980’s causes
1) state owned enterprises declined because taxed at high rates and low worker wages 2) private enterprises controlled by uneducated rural residents
Chinese enterprise system economic effects
1) inflation because state set price for government manufactured products but private could do whatever they wanted 2) corruption – officials accepted bribes to increase product quota
Chinese student frustration
began because Deng’s economic reforms were not accompanied with political freedom
Democracy Wall beginnings
started in 1978 when Deng released political prisoners and permitted popular action independent of the state
Democracy Wall
Chinese put up posters addressing social and political issues, eventually magazines
Democracy Wall, spring 1979
Fifth Modernization (political reform) by Wei Jinhsheng angered Deng who imposed formal restrictions on DW activities, imprisoned Wei because of counterrevolutionary propaganda and releasing state secrets
Chinese student opposition (DW)
Feb, 1989 students drafted petition for democratization, freedom of speech, release of political prisoners; congregated publicly
Hu Yaobang
died in April, 1989; CCP secretary general dismissed for failing to crack down on student protests (did not advocate for democratic rights); death provided pretext for mobilization
Start of Tiananmen marches
student mourners painted portrait of Hu and sat – in at the Great Hall of the People (house of government) to petition Premier Li Peng
Tiananmen petition
end of corruption and officials privileges, increased funds for education, freedom of speech, right to dialogue with party officials (Li Peng never accepted and protests grew)
Beijing Provisional Federation of Autonomous Students Association
students from 21 campuses; primary coordinating body for the movement (100,000 students)
Beijing Provisional Federation of Autonomous Students Association leaders
Wang Dan and Wuer Kaixi
Beijing Provisional Federation of Autonomous Students Association inaugural act
boycott of classes that spread to almost every Beijing university by end of April
Government condemnation of BPFASA
April 26 editorial published in People’s Daily
Deng forces to quell
public security officers, People’s Armed Police, People’s Liberation Army
38th Group Army
20,000 troops sent in after Hu’s funeral/ at beginning of class boycotts
student attitudes toward troops (China)
thought they could get them to sympathize because they were mainly former peasants/ young officers who were well educated and likely sympathetic to the Democracy Movement
April 27 protest (China)
150,000 students marched to protest People’s Daily editorial, police did not stop them (unarmed); police didn’t really try to hold back students so they broke through and the troops didn’t bother anymore (reinforced sympathizing hope)
Hunger strikes (China)
began on May 13 at Martyr’s Monument at Tiananmen; thousands partook and collapsed (8,200 hospiatlized)
Hunger strikes effectiveness (China)
huge in eliciting solidarity from broad population; more than a million came to square to show support
Militant faction (China)
Chai Lang = leader (also led hunger strikes)
State Council meeting (China)
May 14, government didn’t make public, students disorganized and confrontational
Failed negotiations effect (China)
hunger strikes/ Tiananmen occupation continued during Soviet Premier Gorbachev visit
Gorbachev visit (China)
marked end of Chinese – Soviet rift between Mao Zedong and Nikita Krushchev, protestors stole media attention
Police sympathy (China)
officials carried banners of support and wrote secret letter of support; not surprising because many students wrote letters asking for support; both shared similar frustrations of income inequality and declining purchasing power; People’s Liberation Army especially sympathetic
Internal divisions and organizational challenges (China)
hunger strikers fighting against student federation leaders for control of Tiananmen; led to distrust and rumors
Students from outside of Beijing
huge population, demanded voice, felt not fully included, formed own associations
Student - worker tensions (China)
workers pledged early support and raised funds; students hostile and prevented workers from joining ranks
Beijing Workers Autonomous Association
led by Han Dongfang; 5,50 members
CCP elite division
Secretary General Zhao Ziyang and Premier Li Peng. Ziyang = increased reform and modernization, losing stature, advocated leniency with protestors. Peng = slow and modest change, government control against protestors
May 19 (China)
Deng sided with Li, ending Zhao’s career and turning the party towards hard line action against protestors, prepared to impose martial law, protestors ended hunger strike to prepare for action
May 20 (China)
Li announced official martial law
Martial law impact on protests (China)
PLA headed into city bust students built barricades against tanks and pleaded with soldiers, soldiers stopped, unwilling to kill people, eventually ordered to withdraw (went a few hours out, implying confrontation was not over)
Divisions after military (China)
students from outside Beijing outnumber Beijing students
May 27 (China)
Wang Dan of Beijing Student Association announced 10 point program to remove Ping and withdraw from Tiananmen after mass rally on May 30
Opposition to 10 point
students from outside wanted to keep going until June 20 when National People’s Congress convened, wanted direct confrontation within the government (caused Wang Dan to resign)
Statue of Liberty replica
Shanghai demonstrators brought to City Hall, brought new momentum to movement
Goddess of Democracy
put in Tiananmen on May 30, giving movement new edge
Movement unraveling causes (China)
early June. 1) Government staged counterdemonstrations 2) soldiers took control of Chinese media to warn residents to stay home 3) internal tensions escalated 4) unemployed people joined and vandalized government property
June 3 (China)
army entered city from all directions; protestors tried to stop; police used tear gas; crowd got violent; student leaders appealed for nonviolence
Tiananmen massacre
troops were violent and killed thousands to enter square; many didn’t believe, PLA prepared to kill people defying martial law
Protestor reaction to massacre (China)
some tried to negotiate and told crowd they must evacuate; leader Li Lu held vote and eventually everyone evacuated
Factors in students favor (China)
1) weak economy made government vulnerable 2) division within CCP 3) democracy salon/ free space emergence 4) Gorbachev visit provided political opportunity
Movement downfall reason (China)
student failure to get support from members of CCP, alienated workers and foreign students, managers threatened to fire anyone who participated, didn’t trust entrepreneurs
Three civil resistance techniques not successfully used (China)
1) withholding skills 2) withdrawing material resources 3) undermining state sanctioned power
How students could have undermined state’s repressive capacity (China)
1) undermining loyalty of troops 2) refusing to be deterred by punishments/ repression
Why did soldiers turn violent? (China)
1) CCP was aware of troop resistance to violence so brought in new troops that were not subject to appeals 2) faced hostile crowds 3) fatigue from 2 months of opposition
East Germany
German Democratic Republic (GDR), formed after WWII, Soviet – Stalinist practices, independent state by 1949 headed by communist party (SED)
SED
intolerant of people working against socialist agenda (especially religious peeps)
Emigration from East to West
spurred by workers imprisoned for speaking out against govt., rose in response to economic policies
East economic policies that encouraged emigration
1) SED collectivized private farms, set unrealistic work standards 2) work quotas/ low consumption levels (basic goods rationed)
Reason for strikes (EG)
citizens put in long workdays but their purchasing power declined because of military spending
Spring, 1953 (EG)
Soviet leaders pressured SED to alter economic measures because feared national destabilization. EG govt conceded that socialist policies implemented too quickly
New Course
introduced by EG govt, included many reforms but kept stringent work quotas
Start of June 1953 uprising (EG)
shop stewards in Berlin construction site launched sit down strike to protest work quotas, drafted resolution and presented to govt.
June 17 (EG)
marched in streets to the Council of Ministers, general strike suggested and started
Strike participation (EG)
418,000 – tore through govt. offices
EG govt attempt to control strike
martial law, troops in, groups threatened with punishment, 44,000 kept demonstrating, many arrested
Idea policing (EG)
SED kept lid on protests and more people emigrated, causing SED to tighten borders
August, 1961 (EG)
wall went up
EG surveillance
Ministry of State Security (Stasi), population grew, secret informers publicly and privately contracted, organized career and personal failures, created climate of surveillance and minimized opposition
Free space in EG
Protestant Church (weird because EG was largely secular), Stasi unable to suppress because religious
Union of Lutheran Churches
convening point for civic groups concerned about peace, human rights, environment
East Berlin Zion Church
activists reported on state’s environmental abuses (church based environmental library)
Church protection (EG)
1978 agreement with government, protected domain, dwindling numbers indicated no real threat, police not allowed to intervene
Lepzig churches
forefront of movement, many activist pastors (Christian Fuhrer, Wolfgang Groeger), under their leadership, many groups emerged at St. Nicholas focusing on politics
Working Group in the Service of Pease
former construction workers who opposed the military, help first peace prayer with Christoph Wonneberger, became weekly
Peace prayer services
weekly, Wonneberger led, activists promoted agendas, 700 people/ week, growth fueled by concern over nuclear missiles stationed on German soil and appeal to nonreligious
Initiative Group for Life (IGL)
nonviolent resistance, offered workshops and training in nonviolent direct action
Jan 12, 1989 (EG)
IGL handed out leaflets calling for demonstration at Leipzig City Hall, date = Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht commemoration, dozens arrests and jailed, Leipzig became center for opposition
EG govt vulnerability
to external influence and change, linked to Soviet Union because of econ. Subsidies, military reinforcement, politics, Soviet economic, military withdrawal decreased regime power (also economy)
Economy (EG)
deteriorating, no new tech, infrastructural decay, declining demand for EG products, foreign debt, govt hid but people knew
Conditions for uprising (EG)
rising opposition, Gorbachev undercut EG capacity for subduing uprising
Trigger event (EG)
Budapest govt. dismantled guard posts at Austro – Hungarian border, thousands of EG slipped through illegally, Hungary terminated agreement with SED to return all EG’s
Second exit strategy (EG)
thousands occupied WG embassy in Prague, Budapest, Warsaw et al. and filed for refugee status, 15,000 left GDR, “model socialist state” reputation tarnished
Emigration as strategy
mass departure has social/ economic devastation for state, skilled labor fled
Travel ban (EG)
EG suspended travel to Czechoslovakia (EG could visit without visa)
Rise of street dissent (EG)
news about other citizen movements spurred,
Sept. 11 (EG)
police cordoned of St. Nicholas Square, 1,000 people demonstration, many arrested, churches held prayer vigils
Strategy to stop demonstrations (EG)
1) mobilize SED militia to occupy downtown 2) pressure churches to remove activist pastors (churches refused) 3) propaganda portraying demonstrators as malcontents 4) key leaders detained
Oct 2 (EG)
St. Nicholas peace prayer drew 10,000, violent action by police, many organizations formed
New Forum
large opposition organization, 200,000 members
Oct 7 (EG)
10,000 demonstrators in Berlin
Oct 9 (EG)
Leipzig peace prayer, SED leader Honecker ordered shoot to kill, everyone feared tragedy, protestors were peaceful and there was no violence
Why St. Nicholas did not turn violent
1) party officials wanted to avoid intl. sanctions 2) troops were unprepared for massive turnout 3) SED was divided on how to handle demonstrators (no documented explanation for reals though)
Militia member disillusionment
members unwilling to fight for state, increasingly unwilling to cooperate, could see that demonstrators were not contemptible enemies of state, many troops identifies more with people than party
Elite division (EG)
Krenz and Gunther Schabowski said it was time for new leader, Krenz appointed head and announced he would chat with opp. About reforms
Demands in November
end to SED dominance, free elections, unrestricted travel
Krenz travel change
citizens could travel up to one month abroad/ year with govt permission, demonstration held in Leipzig demanding wall down, travel w/o visa
Volkskammer response
refused to accept Krenz plan, SED Council of Ministers resigned, Politburo resigned
New Politburo members
encouraged more liberal travel policy, Krenz accepted Nov. 9
Nov 9 (EG)
20,000 gathered at Berlin Wall, demanded opening, wall came down
Nov 24 (EG)
article that granted SED sole power to rule removed from EG constitution
Nov 29 (EG)
Stasi dismantled
Dec 4 (EG)
Politburo and Central Committee members resigned
Dec 6 (EG)
Krenz resigned, elections to be held Mar 16, 1990
1990 elections (EG)
93.4% turnout to elect EG – WG unification govt
Egon Krenz
Politburo member in charge of security, claimed he told Leipzig to not be violent, discredited
structural factors key to mobilization
1) economic downturn 2) repression/ state – sanctioned atrocity 3) elite defections 4) free space
techniques of civil resistance
1) refusal to acknowledge regime authority 2) refusal to cooperate or comply with laws 3) challenging mentalities of obedience 4) withholding skills 5) withholding material resources 6) undermining state sanctioning power
security force defections
1) from bottom up (EG) 2) top down (China) 3) just a **** storm of defections
why troops remain loyal
1) financial interests 2) fear of retaliation
factors that undermine movement’s chances of winning
1) divided leadership or internal factions 2) inability to remain nonviolent 3) external sanctions that backfired
problems with sanctions
1) country may create new allies for the regime 2) politicians heavily dependent on foreign support
forms of religious support given to nonviolent uprisings
1) free space 2) denunciation of the regime 3) organizational resources 4) encouraged mutiny 5) nonviolence training offered 6) directly helped to maintain nonviolent discipline
Huntington’s argument in Political Order in Changing Societies
widespread domestic violence and instability of the 1950s and 1960s in many parts of the world was in large part the product of rapid social change and the rapid mobilization of new groups into politics, coupled with the slow development of political institutions (lead – lag model)
Huntington’s criteria for the institutionalization of the existing political organization
adaptability, complexity, autonomy, coherence
Huntington’s balanced development theory
rapid social change, mobilization, political institutionalization
Eastern pattern of revolution
new groups mobilize into politics, fashion new political institutions, overthrow old order
Western pattern of revolution
old political institutions disintegrate and then new groups mobilize into politics, create new political institutions, come to power
Immediate cause of revolution (Eastern and Western)
discrepancy between the performance of the regime and the demands being made upon it
Huntington perceptions that make sense
1) revolutions and violence flow out of central political process 2) opp. Claims and counterclaims are important to structure of power 3) large scale structural change transforms identities of politicians
Three kinds of social units within a population
1) government 2) contender for power 3) polity
Contender for power
a group within the population which at least once during some standard period applies resources to influence that government
Polity
the set of contenders which routinely and successfully lays claim on that government
Three necessary political conditions for revolution
1) the appearance of contenders advancing exclusively alternative claims for govt. control 2) commitment to said claims by a significant part of the population 3) unwillingness of govt. agents to suppress alternative coalition
Strongly facilitating condition for revolution
formation of coalitions between members of the polity and the contenders making the alternative claims
How an alternative bloc is formed
1) mobilization of a new contender outside the polity 2) turning away of an existing challenger from acceptance of the polity’s current operating roles 3) turning away of an existing member from its established place in the polity
Acceptance of alternative claims is likely to generalize when
1) govt fails to meet established obligations 2) increases demands on subject population 3) alternative claims are cast within a moral framework employed by many members of the population 4) allegiance between existing govt and enemy of a large segment of pop. 5) coercive resources of alternative bloc increase
Largest factor of promotion of revolutions and collective violence in the West in the past 5 centuries
the great concentration of power in national states
Revolution
a rapid, fundamental, and violent domestic change in the dominant values and myths of a society, in its political institutions, social structure, leadership, government activities and policies; a characteristic of modernization
Coup d’etat
changes only leadership and policies
Rebellion/ insurrection
may change policies, leadership, political institutions but not social structure and values
War of independence
a struggle of one community against rule by an alien community, does not necessarily involve changes in the social structure of either community
When does revolution occur
not in highly traditional societies with low levels of social and economic complexity, not in highly modern societies, in societies which have experienced some social and economic development and where the processes of political modernization and development have lagged behind the processes of social and economic change
Political modernization
the extension of political consciousness to new social groups and the mobilization of these groups into politics
Political development
the creation of political institutions sufficiently adaptable, complex, autonomous, and coherent
The second phase of a revolution
the creation and institutionalization of a new political order
The measure of how revolutionary a revolution is
the rapidity and the scope of the expansion of political participation
The measure of how successful a revolution is
the authority and stability of the institutions to which it gives birth
Principal struggle of Western revolution
between the moderates and the radicals
Two prerequisites for revolution
1) political institutions incapable of providing channels for the participation of new social forces in politics and of new elites in govt. 2) the desire of social forces to participate in politics
Revolutions do not occur in
democratic political systems
Great surprise of 1989
the rebellious actions of the Poles and other Eastern Europeans were accepted and encouraged from Gorbachev’s Soviet regime and Gorbachev asked E. European govts to restrain repression
What occurred in 1989
the collapse of the communist regime, dissolution of all Soviet institutions of govt and the ideology that supported them, economic and political chaos as new groups struggled to reconstitute new states
Trends toward revolution
decline in state effectiveness and fiscal strength, increased alienation and conflict among elites, clogged routes of social mobility that create competition among elite aspirants, increase in mass mobilization potential
Four types of power
economic, ideological, military, political
Soviet Union economically after WWII
steady industrial growth rate established centers of modern industrial production
Soviet Union militarily after WWII
kept NATO and US on defensive throughout world
Gorbachev economic efforts
bankrupted state
The failure of socialism became most marked in
the environmental arena in the wake of Chernobyl
Apr. 29, 1986
a nuclear reactor at Chernobyl nuclear power station overheated leading to explosions and fires that spread radioactive material, Soviet authorities did not recognize until days later and ordered public facilities to remain open
Main social divide among the elites in Soviet Russia
between the younger, better educated, more urban artists, writers, academicians, professionals, technical specialists who liked Gorbachev then Yeltsin, and older provincial party careerists and officials who supported status quo
Intifada
the uprising by the Palestinian people against the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza
Three central questions of revolutionary collective action
1) why do people rebel? 2) how is revolutionary collective action sustained in the face of overwhelming counterforce? 3) how does the revolutionary process shape the political outcome in an emerging state?
Two bases on which notable’s authority rested were a web of traditional patron (Palestine)
client relationships and ownership of land
New elite
sought political and social transformation, to undermine social bases of political power
Grassroots organizations in Palestine
student blocs, labor unions, women’s committees, voluntary work organizations; provided a means to oppose notable power and build the social and political relations necessary to sustain the Intifada
First structural change in Palestine
changing patterns of employment, land tenure, higher education
Second structural change in Palestine
Israeli confiscation of land
Third structural change in Palestine
development of Palestinian University system (1972)
Frontal assault on notables by Israeli government
1) outlawed Palestine National Front 2) dismissed mayors elected in 1976 municipal Palestine elections
Devolved authority
authority spread downward in society and became much more diffused within it than before
Institutions of devolved authority
grassroots orgs, popular committees (Intifada, Unified National Leadership of the Uprising (UNLU)), militant groups,
Growing influence of Islam in Palestinian society in the 1980’s
social practices, institution building, student body elections, public opinion surveys
Two Islamist factions in the occupied territories that stood out
Muslim Brethren (old, big, influential) and Islamic Jihad (militant, aggressive)
Why was Palestine lost according to Islamists?
as God’s punishment for turning away from Islam
Muslim brotherhood policy on Israeli presence in Middle East
formally rejected
Islamic Resistance Movement
Hamas, Palestinian Islamist movement, undertook an ideological campaign devoted to the idea that Palestine should not be ceded to Israel and grew militant, competed with PLO for authority
Structural changes that brought revolution (Palestine)
weakened elite and brought counterelite to forefront
Sustained collective action
directly linked to the reorganization of authority in Palestinian society by the mobilization efforts of the new elite
What type of revolution was the Intifada?
social because of its social transformative element, sought to remake internal Palestinian society
How is Palestine exceptional?
1) Intifada produced polity without enjoying success 2) political elite that came to power after revolution was not the same that was in power before
Oslo Accords
developed in Oslo by Israeli and Palestinian negotiators
Declaration of Principles
1993, signed at WH
Gaza – Jericho agreement
1994, allowed for the establishment of the Palestinian Authority (PA) in the Gaza Strip and Jericho
Al – Aqsa Intifada
2000
How the Oslo Accords shaped the Palestinian state building process
1) made possibility of Palestinian statehood more likely 2) focused exclusively on interim arrangements 3) revived a fiscally bankrupt and politically dying PLO in Tunisia and put power in Gaza and the West Bank
Dominant tribe in 18th, 19th c. Afghanistan
Pashtun
P.M Mohammad Daud
committed to rapid socioeconomic modernization
1955 Deal
Afghan – Soviet
foreign aid in Afghanistan
major source of revenue, provided wealth that changed state/ rural society relationship
1963 Afghanistan
P.M. Daud resigns, King Zahir Shah rules (focuses on limited democratization)
1936 – 1973 Afghanistan
Shah constitutional rule
1973 Afghanistan
P.M. Daud leads coup to dispose of king that fails
ulema
religious institution that held power in Afgh.
Why did Daud resign?
King wanted to go to parliamentary democracy and forced Daud to resign
Pashtun
half of pop, not a business language (contentious issue)
1964 language
Pashtun and Persian declared official languages but Pashtun was national lang. (caused many divisive issues)
Daud modernization
Westernization, spurred Islamist movement against
Political parties in Afgh.
King allowed but had no formal role, led to conflicts, Communist, Islamist, Nationalist
People’s Democratic Party of Aghanistan (PDPA)
big Communist party, formed in 1465, Marxist theory
Afghan Social Democratic Party (ASDP)
formed in 1966, nationalist, representative parliamentary democracy, Pashtun
Attempted coup (Afgh)
Zahir cared about Westernization > people, economic stagnation, 1973, Daud launched anti – Islamist campaign, PDPA opposed Daud, 1978 – PDPA tried to overthrow and succeeded
PDPA Decree #6
rural debt, taxes down, no interest, tried to get rid of feudal systems, destroyed rural credit systems
PDPA Decree #7
regulated marriage and wedding expenses, seen as unnecessary govt intervention
PDPA Decree #8
land redistribution, thought it would help peasants, failed
PDPA Decree #3
replaced Afgh. Flag to completely red flag
Cases for revolution
launched all changes at once, class warfare, elite alienation, popular discontent
Dec, 1979 (Afgh)
Soviets invade Afgh. And rebellion spreads to rest of country. US supports afghan resistance to Soviet occupation
Anti Soviet resistance groups
7 main – Islamists, Traditionalists
President of PDPA
Najibullah
SA racial makeup
¾ black with many different linguistic and ethnic groups (largest = Bantu) 15% white 3% Asian 9% mixed (“colored”)
1948 SA
apartheid officially adopted, strict racial segregation, only whites allowed to do many things, election sweeped by whites b/c they could vote
African National Congress (ANC)
worked against apartheid, leaders banned or imprisoned
United Democratic Front (UDF)
claimed to have no association with ANC or leaders
Armed struggle role in SA
attracted popular support to the anti apartheid movement, demonstrated persistence of resistance of white supremacy despite repression, complicated badge of commitment for anti – apartheid activists
ANC Defense Campaign
1952, refused to obey segregationist rules in public spaces, huge success in terms of mobilization, massive arrests and gains in membership, no political achievements
Role of communism in SA
govt rebranded anti – apartheid as communism
Sharpeville
massacre, 1960, many shot as tried to run from police, 20,000 arrested, political parties banned
International support (SA)
no country felt obliged to help end apartheid, US loaned $ to shore up SA capital reserves
ANC guerillas
several dramatic attacks, Christian, tried to avoid civilian deaths, limited targets to military installations and economic sabotage, not militarily successful
Soweto uprising
1976, high school students interrupted public life
Nelson Mandela
first commander of MK (ANC’s armed wing), rejected govt offers to release him from jail if he denounced armed struggle
Armed propaganda (SA)
boosted activist morale
ANC nonviolent strategy
make townships ungovernable
Economic factors in favor of communist collapse
inefficient, technologically stagnant, incapable of keeping pace with capitalist West
Fall of communism in EE result of
reformist orientation of the Soviet leader and his refusal to deploy Soviet forces to defend the Soviet Union’s satellite regimes in the region
EE totalitarianism in the 1960’s
decreased, post – totalitarian regimes emerged
Salamis for submission
post totalitarian policy, if a regime could not produce salami, they could not expect submission
Soft budget constraints of state enterprises
provided few incentives for efficient production, quality control, development of labor saving techniques
Economic stagnation in EE
led a number of EE states to borrow heavily from the West during the 1970’s, compounded problems of external dependence, led to a number of experiments with economic liberalization and decentralization
State – socialist regimes
used repression against those who sought social change
Opposition movements in EE in 1989 characteristics similar to third world revolutionary movements
1) multiclass movements 2) widespread anger against state authorities 3) nationalism or patriotism 4) led by radical leadership 5) initiative and reactive ideologies
Opposition to communism people
not confined to the poorest or the most oppressed segments of society: general movement
Opposition to communism anger
against political authority, economic resource control
Beginning of 1989 China situation
better clothed, fed, housed than a decade earlier when political reform was introduced
Cultural diversity in 1989 China
reforms improved, literature, art, idea restrictions relaxed, cultural heritage, Western media, ancestor worship, feudal remnants, led to boom in domestic tourism
Three groups within the population representing views of reform (China):
not far enough, too far, satisfied
Beijing Spring demonstration group
not far enough
Not far enough makeup
students, intellectuals, urban entrepreneurs,
Not far enough “slogan”
improved treatment of intellectuals and future intellectuals, reforms aimed at giving such individuals greater autonomy, comfortable working conditions, greater rewards, increased freedom
Reform success to not far enough
significant gap between reform goals and present realities under reform, many found themselves in the same job
Not far enough anger
hypocrisy involved in the meritocratic vision of reform, did not produce society in which the educated, skilled, hardworking, innovative received reward and prestige
Not far enough goal
reduce power of the party/ state bureaucracy, but alternative not mass egalitarian democracy
May Fourth Movement
China’s student led, Western oriented reform movement, 1919
Too far people
massive, made task of building popular support for further reform problematic, industrial workers, low level bureaucrats and party officials, army, police, not articulate
Lives of Chinese before 1949
constant fear of unemployment, inflation, impoverishment transformed by socialist system
Selective firing
women over men, justified by saying that male workers were less troublesome and more productive
Management rights over state firms
1988 + 1989, govt considered contracting out, made bureaucrats and intellectuals angry, justified saying that it would turn failing enterprises around and preserve jobs, seen as sellout of socialism and return to exploitative capitalism
Chief complaints of too fars
fixed incomes prevented them from benefiting as much as others from the reforms, reforms threatened their power and prestige within their local groups and society
Too far vision
not one in which party bureaucrats would be replaced at the top of the social pyramid by meritocratic experts
Too far resentment target
entrepreneurs, well educated experts and managers, high level leaders
Factors that made economic frustration severe (China):
1) years of enforced Spartan living of the Mao period that left every group in society feeling that its just demands for material improvement urgency needed to be met 2) inflation
Two satisfied groups (China):
peasants, high ranking bureacrats
Peasant view of reform (China):
rescued them from state – enforced poverty
Important element in revolution building (China)
relaxation of political control that occurred in the reform era
What made 1989 China different from previous years
crumbling of unity within the elite and the implicit and explicit encouragement that the more ardent reformers within the leadership gave to students and others to raise critical voices
PWNER
regional EU in US (Oregon, Canada, Washington, etc.)
Treaty of Rome
1957, attempt to get economy going, Belgium, France, W. Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Luxembourg, created EEC
European Economic Community
similar to NAFTA (free trade)
1973 EEC change
expands and allows UK, Ireland, Denmark, becomes European Community, creates unicameral European Parliament, creates European Executive (legislative) with commission and rotating countries, created European Court
1975 Spain
fascist under Franco
1986 added countries
Spain, Portugal (controversial because Franco just died)
1980 added country
Greece (prematurely because of Cyprus
COMECON
grouping of communist countries
1988 EU action
issues invitation to EE countries
1989 Europe
communism falls
1995 EU
recognized as official, Austria, Sweden, Finland added
2004 added countries
Poland, Hungary, Czech Rep., Slovakia, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Malta, Slovenia
Recent additions to EU
Croatia, Romania, Bulgaria, Cyprus
Countries that really want to join EU but can’t because to poor
Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia, Albania, Belarus, Maldova
European Neighborhood Plan
colonized N. Africa
Arab – Mogrub – Union
Qadafi created, free trade in N. Africa
Permanent democracy $
$9,000 <
1980 Yugoslavia
Tito dies (ruled with iron grip), end of abject poverty
1991 Europe
Slovenia leaves Yugoslavia to join EU
Where do Serbs live?
E, NE Croatia
Bosnia ethnic groups
Serbs (E. Orthodox), Croats (Catholic), muslims
Eastern Orthodox
don’t follow Pope, have own patriarchs
Umberto Rossi
nationalist Italian leader, Northern League party
1992 – 1995
war in Croatia because of Catholic Croats and Serbs, Serbs fighting in Bosnia
land of Serbia
Kosovo
Kosovo ethnic makeup
90% ethnic Albanians
1054
Great Schism, Ottomans took over Serbia
Slobodan Milosevic
1989 = rise, tells 10% they rule, didn’t regard 90% Albanian Muslims (form parallel society)
Kosovo Liberation Army
formed against 10%, Called terrorist group by Milosevic
EU joint military task force
UN precedent, Serbs open fire, US gets involved,
Dayton Accords
US put embargo on Serbia until they stop providing arms to rebels, Serbs had to give up land from 60% to 49%
Croatian Muslim Federation
got 51% of land
1999 Clinton
told Milosevic that Serbia needs to withdraw military from Kosovo, Milosevic withdraws because many people are killed, Kosovo split up between countries, NATO airstrikes kill a ton of people, long history of conflict in the region
1991 Albania
held elections won by communists, Italy intervenes
Sali Berisha
dominant Albanian politician
1997 Albania
people and army marched on government, Italy intervenes
Macedonia
Greeks have problem because of Alexander the Great, had to call themselves the Former Yugoslavia Republic of Macedonia
Soviet Union
began in 1917, became nuclear power in 1949
Communism goal
economic equality
Capitalism goal
political equality
Best oil in the world
Libya and Iran
1980 – 1999
SU funnels $ into Afghanistan
1989 SU
SU coup, Gorbachev arrested, starts cutting national costs, Yeltsin becomes president
Four countries that didn’t join new commonwealth after SU breakup
Baltics (Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia), Georgia
Bahrain
3rd country in Middle East with majority Shiite, Sunni rule, no democracy, pro – US
1960 UN resolution
bans colonization
North Africa is
Arab
Moritania, Sudan religion
Islam
2001 world religious makeup
2.1 B Christians, 1.1 B Muslim
2013 world religious makeup
2.2 B. Christians, 1.9 B. Muslim
Al Qaeda
academy to train revolutionaries
Long term goal of Arab nations
join EU
African Union
Qadhafi created in 1999
Benefits of Africa joining EU
end strifes, be friends with each other
2007 Darfur
US takes control of opposition
Principles to get country off ground (especially Africa)
1) democracy 2) internal conflict/ economic development 3) industrialize 4) international investment 5) free trade 6) infrastructure 7) export 8) national resources 9) regional cooperation 10) borders?
Sudan Defense Force
WWII aids Africa
1956 Arab
Nassar in Egypt (Arab nationalism)
December 2010
start of Arab spring, all 19 states caught the democracy bug
Order of Arab revolutions
Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen
“Arab exception”
the apparent inability of neo patriarchal states to move towards political norms shared by most of the world
Morsi overthrown
by combination of popular rejection and military muscle
Persistent insurgency countries
El Salvador, Guatemala, Peru, Colombia
Defeated rebellions
Malaya, Philippines, Venezuela
Five major popularly supported rebellions that developed in Latin America during the 1970s and 1980s
Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Colombia, Peru
Shining Path insurgencies
Salvador, Guatemala, Peru
Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front (FMLN)
Salvador, never militarily defeated
Guatemalan National Revolution Unity (URNG)
launched offensives in the 1980s, recognized political organization
Maoist Communist Party of Peru
Sendero Luminoso, effectively defeated
Successful insurgency example
Vietnam, Cuba, Nicaragua
Defeated revolutionary movement example
Malayan Communist Party in British Malaya, Communist led Huk revolution in Philippines, Communist led party in postwar Greece, Mau Mau uprising in Kenya, Armed Forces of National Liberation in Venezuela
Third, neglected, revolution category
protracted or persistent insurgency
Persistent insurgency example
Burma, Colombia
Guatemala insurgency
early 1960s (US sponsored counterinsurgency)
What’s notable about El Salvador?
massive death, death squads, internal displacement
Peru human rights
worst of any country in the world from 1987 – 1991 in terms of disappearances
Venezuela insurgency
largest Latin America guerilla movement of the 1960s, inspired by the Cuban Revolution, decisively defeated by the Salvadoran and Guatemalan regimes
Why do persistent insurgencies persist?
they are especially large and popular
Why are defeated insurgencies defeated?
they are smaller and more vulnerable to counterinsurgency
Why are large and popular insurgencies able to remain large and popular?
1) racial/ ethnic in nature and rooted in class or socioeconomic grievances 2) have only been defeated where incumbent regimes have received substantial foreign assistance, particularly military aid
Did Peru receive substantial external assistance in the 1980s?
no
US military aid to Venezuala government in the 1960s
no more than 5% of that country’s total military expenditures
El Salvador aid
US gave $3 billion in economic aid and $1 billion in military aid (insurgency persisted)
Revolutionary movements that receive massive foreign aid will ____
be able to persist, while those that do not, will not
Insurgencies and land reform
will persist, if not seize power, where no land reform is enacted
Unequal land distribution in Latin America
Guatemala
Venezuela land reform
regime established 800 < settlements between 1958 and 1968
Philippine land reform in 1950s
nonexistent (haha trick question *****)
Principal counterinsurgency tool in Malaya
resettlement of 600,000 Chinese rural squatters into New Villages (reverse land reform)
Rebellions are doomed when regimes introduce
competitive elections (allow people to express grievances at a low cost with no risk)
Electoral hypothesis confirmation countries
Philippines, Malaya, Venezuela
Electoral hypothesis antiexamples
El Salvador, Guatemala
Competitive elections do not
guarantee that groups can make political demands without suffering violent repression
Armed revolutionary movements result from
the violent suppression of the peaceful political activities of aggrieved people who have the capacity to rebel
Why did the FMLN disarm?
because they realized they could not win the war and because the government agreed to recognize fundamentally its armed forces under UN supervision
Three important factors for research on negotiated settlements of civil wars
1) the pervasiveness of racism among military officers 2) the extent of corruption within the officer corps 3) the extent of military prerogatives within the polity
April 1975
US backed South Vietnamese regime fell, Communist forces seized power in Cambodia, Laos
Guinea - Bissau colonial power
Portugal
Countries that emerged after pro – Soviet regimes entered Ethiopia and Afghanistan in 1979
Mozambique, Angola
Anti – Marxist commentators
tend to emphasize the role of economic factors in the demise of Communism, communism collapsed because it represented a form of economic organization that was inefficient, technologically stagnant, incapable of competing with capitalist West
1989 term
triumph of a new civil society, old regime pulled down by a combination of political dissidents, capitalist entrepreneurs
deus ex machine
Albert Hirschman, the fall of Communism in EE was an inevitable result of the reformist orientation of the Soviet leader and of his refusal to employ Soviet forces to defend the Soviet Unions satellite regimes in that region
Alex Tocqueville
study of French Revolution, state constructionism, emphasizes how the organizational configurations of state’s patterns of activity affect political culture, encourage group formations and collective political actions and make possible the raising of certain political issues
Neopatrimonial personalist dictatorship examples
Mexico, Iran, Cuba, Nicaragua,
Radically exclusionary and repressive colonial regime examples
Vietnam, Algeria, Angola
States destroyed by Second and Third World Revolutions properties
1) highly autonomous of weakly organized domestic social classes, interest groups, and associations in civil society 2) economically/ militarily dependent upon foreign powers 3) repressive of independent opposition movements 4) implicated in the ownership or control of important economic sectors
Explosive mixture in 2nd and 3rd world revolutionary movements
extreme state autonomy, external dependence, exclusionary authoritarianism, politicized economy
Prerevolutionary states in Iran and Nicaragua government
highly autonomous and personalistic dictatorships
Dependent factors of economic enterprises in Eastern Europe
less dependent on economic rationality than on access to state resources and protection from would – be competitors, dependent on political loyalty to state leaders, party membership, personal connections, outright corruption
Economic stagnation in EE
led to a number of EE states to borrow heavily from the West during the 1970s, compounded problems of external dependence
Repression and political exclusion
weakens the appeals of opposition groups calling for reforms or accommodations with existing regimes and strengthens the radicals who argue that the entire social and political order must be redone
Five shared characteristics between EE and 3rd world revs
1) multiclass movements 2) widespread anger against state authorities 3) anger at nationalism or patriotism 4) led by radical leadership 5) imitative and reactive ideologies
Fusion principle
Bartlomiej Kaminski, fusion of the despotic state and the economy, rendered political authorities responsible for all that happened in EE, encouraged the politicization and nationalization of initially local struggles over the price of goods
Refolutions
negotiated revolutions
Differences between revolutionary processes in EE and 3rd world
1) spontaneous and peaceful nature of 1989 2) urban character of mobilization 3) absence of counterrevolutionary violence
Factors explaining the peaceful revolutions in EE
1) Gorbachev 2) Communists perceived liberalization and open elections as elements of strategic retreat that was necessary 3) EE ruling elites not physically threatened by their opponents 4) embourgeoisment/ self – privatization
Success of most revolutionary movements of the Cold War era
hell nah
Successful East Asian revolutions
China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos
Semiopen regime
revolutionary organizations unable to mobilize significant movements
Central reason for increasing prevalence of nonviolence or unarmed protest
general expansion of most states infrastructural power since WWII
Two keys to our nonrevolutionary times
globalization, and demise of Soviet Communism