• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Differences between 1)information processing approach and 2)dynamical systems approach

1)assume the existence of a command centre in the brain that makes executive decisions regarding movement


a plan (program) is retrieved from memory and commands are sent to the motor system to implement the action

Differences between 1)information processing approach and 2)dynamical systems approach

2)plan created by a command centre cannot account for all variations/adjustments in skilled movement and the memory would struggle


movements 'emerge'/self-organise from dynamical interaction of numerous variables in the body, the environment and the task

Differences between 1)information processing approach and 2)dynamical systems approach

1)movement variability is regarded as negative, as it suggests an unstable schema


relies heavily on outcome measures

Differences between 1)information processing approach and 2)dynamical systems approach

2)variability is considered on many levels


--performance or endpoint variability is viewed negatively


--coordinative/joint variability is seen as positive, and often called functional variability

Humans are Complex Systems

-Comprise of many interacting biological systems (e.g. CV, musculo-skeletal, etc)


-Variable degrees of freedom (DoF)- independent elements of a system free to vary in different ways


-Non-linearity of behaviour because component parts act in any different ways (progression, regression, plateus)


-Stable and unstable patterned relationships (walking is stable but as soon as you hit ice it is unstable)


-Subsystem components limit or influence the behaviour of each other

Self-organisation

These system interactions enhance the intrinsic organisation of the system

Coordination among parts

-Numerical phase space- hypothetical total number of states a self organised system can settle onto


-Stable/functional patters of organisation- attractors


-E.g. runner legs coordinate into an antiphase pattern


-Order parameters- abstract variables that define or describe the overall behaviour of system, e.g. relative phase


-Control parameters- a variable that influences the stability and character of the order parameter, e.g. frequency

Constraints

-Actions, plans and memories are not stored in the CNS but self organise according to constraints


-Task, environment and individual help to solve DoF problems


-E.g. environment: won't run on ice.


-E.g. task: different sports have different rules that limit movement patterns produced

DoF Problem

Cortical keyboard: what's going on in brain


Spinal keyboard: movement comes to muscles via CNS


Motor unit-->alpha gamma linkage--> muscle--> joint action


This is loads of DoF

Motor Equivalence

Redundancy through many DoF (don't need to use them)

Context-Conditioned Variability

-Anatomical (role of a muscle is context dependent)


-Mechanical (command sent to muscles is ignorant against motion/nonmuscular forces)


-Physiological (spinal cord is not just a relay station)

Berstein's DoF Problem

-How does the brain control and organise the huge number of possible outcomes of action?


-Skilled movement it: process of mastering redundant DoF of the moving organ, in other words its conversion to a controllable system

Route to Skilled Behaviour

Eliminating DoF

Freezing DoF-Reduce range of movement about a joint


Coordinative structure- couple joints (what one done so does the other)



Exploring DoF

Releasing DoF


Reconfigure coordinative structures

Coordinative structures (Turvey 1977)

-a group of muscles spanning several joints that is constrained to act as a single functional unit


-Joining two points will reduce number of DoF

Adam's closed looped theory of learning claims learning cannot occur without:

memory


long term memory


knowledge of results


perceptual trace

Transfer of learning that occurs between 2 limbs is called:

symmetric transfer


asymmetric transfer


bilateral transfer


positive transfer

4 pieces of info are available when making a movement (Schmidt):

-Initial conditions, recall schema, recognition schema, response specification


-Sensory consequences, knowledge of results, response outcome, summary feedback


-Initial senses, sensory consequences, response outcome, recall schema


-Initial conditions, response specifications, sensory consequences, response outcome

A coordinative structure:

-Tuvey's definition


-group of muscles spanning several joints that is constrained to act as a single functional unit


-are rules that select parameter values for specific movement and initiate goal directed performance


-can only be identified using fMRI

GMP comprises both a:

Rate and force parameter

Characteristics of retention tests

Recall schema benefits from what type of practice

Variable practice

Characteristics of learning:

-Dependent upon practice/experience


-A relatively permanent change in performance

Absolute Error is defined as:

The deviation between the criterion and the performance ignoring direction

Benefit of previous experience on the learning of a new skill is called:

Bilateral transfer is:

The transfer of learning that occurs between two limbs