Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
5 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Local Integration |
linked to sovereignty. Depends on refugee's level of attachment (Hathaway) Second-most favourable option Issues are socio-cultural Integration not always favourable |
|
Resettlement |
Last resort. - UNHCR supervisory role. Cannot force states to 'take' Refugees for resettlement. resettling in a 3rd country because 1st country doesnt offer local integration and repatriation is not an option - lengthy process requring inter-cooperation state to state and UNHCR, IOM facilitation Priority given to vulnerable and children Substantial protection provided Lebanon: After 6 months lebanese authorities asks syrian refugees to pay so UNHCR gives status to enable resettlement. Once resettled to the US however, refugees are re-screened as opposed to Sweden who just takes refugees |
|
Voluntary Repatriation |
Most favourable option. - Should be facilitated - not promoted (bordering forced) - must be complete choice of refugee - Safe country? Decided by refugee and host country - UNHCR facilitates as part of mandate linked to cessation - If conditions change you must go back - it is not voluntary repatriation |
|
Is voluntary repatriation achievable? |
- Human Rights must be considered - May take too long for country to be re-build - Hathaway: Solution oriented approach: Northern states should pay southern states to take on refugees - Should the country be assesed objectively? (No: Impractical and violates convention) Hathaway yes - clear criteria and no longer than 5 yrs before repatriation |
|
Duty of the state |
States do not have a duty to grant asylum. They have a duty to enable and facilitate a fair application. They only have an obligation to their own citizens - right to return. |