• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/8

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

8 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Name the 6 types of defences

Duress, Necessity, Self-defence, Automatism, Insanity, Intoxication

What are the AR and MR of a Duress by Threat defence?

AR:


1) Threat of death or serious injury (Quayle)


2) Threat to D or someone close to D


3) No evasive action reasonably available




MR:


1) D honestly committed the crime to prevent the threat


2) D's belief was honest and reasonable (Howe)

What are the facts of Quayle?

D argued he was justified in using marijuana to ease the pain of multiple sclerosis. Court denied duress defence because there was no threat of death or serious injury.

While the threat does not have to be specified for a duress defence, it must reasonably exist. Name a case that shows this.

Ali

What are the two situations in which a defence of duress cannot be used?

Where D put themselves in a situation where criminal activity was foreseeable (like joining a criminal organization).




As a defence to murder.

What are the two elements of self-defence?

Necessity (subjective)




Reasonableness (objective - but based on D's perception of the situation)

Name and summarize 4 key cases in necessities

Bourne - defence of necessity permitted doctor, D, to perform abortion on 14-year old girl (abortion was illegal at the time)




F v West Berkshire Authority - HoL permitted D, doctor, to sterilize mentally ill woman who would have become more distressed by pregnancy




Shayler - D leaked government secrets exposing corruption. Court rejected necessity defence.




R v Jones & Milling - Defendants broke into RAF base and damaged fighter planes, arguing that it was preventing greater evil. Defence rejected.

What are the three requirements of a necessity defence?

1) Criminal act must be intended to avoid a necessary evil




2) Act limited to minimum necessary




3) Criminal act not disproportionate - it must be the lesser evil