• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/17

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

17 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

what is Defamation

publication of a statement, person, lower him in the estimation of right thinking members of society generally or tends to make ppl shun or avoid him

types of defamation

libel, slander

what is libel

dfm in permanent form, visible to eyes, actionable per se, plaintiff need not to prove any damages

what is slander

dfm in temporary. thru words or gestures. not actionable per se

exception

1. slander to woman


2. profession & business reputation


3. contagious disease& crime

cases exception

luk kai lam - pelacur, rm50


wan abdul rashid v s subramaniam


c sivanathan - crime

elements

1. words are defamatory


2. words refer to ptf


3. words hv been published

1. words must be defamatory

kes dp vijandran v karpal singh s420


kes lau chee kuan - kes hantu, appellant

3 ways

1. natural & ordinary meaning


2. innuendo


3. juxtaposition

natural meaning

ayob bin saud kes tanah mahal


test: wld reasonable man hv tendecy to look down upon the ptf

innuendo

not literal meaning


false innuendo and legal innuendo

false innuendo

implications arising from them


- lee kuan yew

legal innuendo

prove:


external facts other than words


facts are known


- tolley v fry

juxtaposition

visual effects


- monsoon v tussauds


- syed kechik

2. words must refer to ptf

test: david v canavan


- are the words such that it wld reasonable in the circumstances to lead persons acquainted w the ptf to believe that he was the person referred to?



kes atip bin ali v josephine

3. words must be published

third party


- dr jenni ibrahim v s pakianathan

defences

consent


justification


fair comment