Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
16 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
@@obobytherule to be made 5 U.S.C. § 553(c) (2006).OIە\ “on the record after the opportunity for a hearing.” See AdministrativeProcedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 553(c) (2006).OIە\
|
@@oboby 5 U.S.C. § 553(c) (2006).OIە\gets outmof wisconsin without payingall, thwe nfines@@==@@ nd publish the final rule in theFederal Register. See id. §§ 553, 556, 557oە|�\!
|
|
|
.A member of Respondeatxxxsuperior defined-- U.S. CONST. Art. 2, § 1, cl. 2
|
.A member of respondeartxxxthe executive branch who does not have the power to exercisesignificant authority or discretion in executing the law is considered anemployee rather than an officer.e id
|
|
|
worsatOnlythencabinetnormthe head= Grantappeal ,and pursue..is an inferior officer.==mere employees’’’’investigator,auditor,clerk,tەg�\!
|
worksatOnlythencabinetnormthe head==See Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988)/emember that a principal officer is a high-levelofficial, such as a cabinet member or the head of an agency ordepartment./htwەd�\!
|
|
|
acts commitedthe the redreess availabemYouso focused onWisdoconly supposed to forward and possess funds putted on the books."ە\!
|
acts comitted redress availYouso focused on the power he has and the title thati possed. The acts he commitedthe the redreess availabem l by thenstatutes cand case should take centerstage.
|
|
|
theyare 309.45 to309.55mentiojn collecting and disbursing.f'ە4�\!
|
theyare only supposed to mdeduct form earned and received.
|
|
|
hallway gruh-huh....stiny on deoranat and tooth paste.you violatinnlavender dudz
|
303.73hallwayeven in major discipline toothbrush and toothpaste supposed to cpome in.QXە\!
|
|
|
jjjdepchare1dispositionseehowhauwokingjonynn"e"--extra confinement--on waiver date?
|
jjjjdepchar1dispositionseehowhauwokingjonynn"depcharge" --303.74== Staff shall not place an inmate in controlled separationunless a conduct report or incident report is written for the conduct givingrise to the use of controlled separation.
|
|
|
depcharge2 liepaperDOC 303.76 Uncontestedminor disposition. Haase and boss lied thatnjeff didn’t disputethenreincarceration with them.they bngotn notice�eەv�\!
|
depcharge2 .=====liepaper(3) Ifthe inmate consents to the disposition, the staff shall submit the contemplateddisposition to the supervisor for review.:Ezەi�\!
|
|
|
depcharge3 DOC 303.81 bksu74 Contestedmajor disposition: waiver of due process hearing. (6) Decision. After the hearing the hearing officer shalldo all of the followingack�ە��\�
|
depcharge3 :==(b) bksu74Render a decision on each charge.They haven’t even rendered adecision onbnthen charge.submitە\!
|
|
|
do they have writs how come u didnt no for the ngoverment a ction A po9lice grivenace doent work because its just like a CONGRESSGRIEVANCE i;ە(Z\!
|
do they have writs of mandmus ormuse of force(dothat sound like what i want)--….UNLESS ITR ENACTS LAWS AND RULES OR REWITESMrules and laws.THEM IT NOT MTHE FUNCTION IMSEEKING TO MUSE.)ە:�\!
|
|
|
the-se formaladjudication not firstattcotus bt my tape or74,81 instead of 76 Where wasbthe opportnityforthe formal hearingon this matter/spa&ە 5�\! 5apa554
|
the-se formaladjudication by specifying that adjudication must occur on the record after theopportunity for an agency hearing. See AdministrativeProcedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 554 tape or74,81 instead of 76 �����RەA�\!
|
|
|
he didnt even do formallacking === Freedom is always a forma adjufication he did afromalm adjudcationnwithan infomalmhearing n>
|
he dint evendo formallacking ===violatesee AdministrativeProcedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 (2006mە\!
|
|
|
he didnt 2Dintconsider couhlin versus black,no condicted hearing wore than poor
|
de didnt2Dintconsider winess testimonyn2)or mdiod he have a hearing on the testimony<ە\!
|
|
|
hence((brokethemboth a See Freedom2 because he violated not only law but apa (if he aiuntevenndownwithnhis ownshit mitshouldnof beenhanbed in)it makes him scienter in hisnjudgement2handin==-;coە\!
|
hence((brokethemboth , 5 U.S.C. § 553 (2006); Vermont Yank v. Natural Resources (1978). (((vilation))tion ە\!
|
|
|
U.S.CONST. Art. 2, § 1, cl. 2 U am da respondeatsuperior man— o!ە2�\! he isnt a goodfaithilliganflunkhedaman
|
U.S.CONST. Art. 2, § 1, cl. 2. An inferior officer is a lower-level official anddoes not include higher-level officials such as the head of an agency, whowould be considered a principal officerArial",ە\!heisnt a podfaitill flu kt
|
|
|
dint3U.S.CONST. Art. 2, § 1, cl. 2 Basically only an officer has the power to complain abut policies that exist–your officer cronies and/or younanswer ton the beoartd and yal we derelictabout describing the policies a and furhter derelict about saying that yallwasan’t down with that.p>jەy�\!
|
dint3Notgiving me abrak mon whatbi do wrong nbutmngiving me the full heat andthen some for msomethingyou know or had reasonntom know thatnid dint do.dsiragment-u motherfuckersn got gilligan off onwhat hendid
|
