• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/11

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

11 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
General scope of exclusionary rule
prohibits introduction of all evidence obtained in violation of D's 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment rights and ALL "fruit of the poisonous tree" unless costs excluding evidence would outweigh deterrent effect on police misconduct
Exceptions to fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
- fruits derived from statements obtained in violation of Miranda
- evidence obtained from source independent of original illegality
- D's intervening act of free will
- inevitable discovery
- violations of knock and announce rule
4th Amendment prohibits
unreasonable searches and seizures; source of exclusionary rule
5th Amendment contains
privilege against self-incrimination
prohibition against double jeopardy
6th Amendment rights
- speedy trial
- public trial
- trial by jury
- confront witnesses
- compulsory process for obtaining witnesses
- right to counsel for crimes involving imprisonment
Exclusionary Rule does NOT apply to
1) grand juries, civil proceedings, violations of state law, internal agency rules, parole recovation proceedings
2) GOOD FAITH reliance on law, defective search warrant, or clerical error
3) can be used for IMPEACHMENT purposes
Evidence from illegal search can be used to impeach
Defendant's statements (not others statements)
Can evidence be excluded due to knock and announce violation?
No!
Harmless Error Test
If illegal evidence is admitted, the conviction should be overturned on appeal UNLESS government can show BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT that error was HARMLESS
Does harmless error test apply to denial of right to counsel?
No!
Who bears the burden of establishing admissibility of evidence?
Government by PROPONDERANCE