Criminal Justice P100 Exam 2

Front 1

mutual pledge

Back 1

watch and ward, I help out my fellow citizens, safety

Front 2

Sir Robert Peel

Back 2

head of first organized police MPA

Front 3

frankpledge

Back 3

english, tithings into hundreds, reeve of the shire

Front 4

posse comitatus

Back 4

legal term to deuptize. authorized to kill

Front 5

Broken windows

Back 5

worry about little things like broken windows or drunks, bigger crimes also committed by smaller offenders, looks nice, less crime

Front 6

decentralization of policing

Back 6

scared of giving too much power to police

Front 7

sheriff

Back 7

in charge of protection of courts, local jail

Front 8

watchman style

Back 8

sir robert peel, making an arrest is the last resort, more discretion, promotes corruption

order maintenance

Front 9

legalistic style

Back 9

only concerned with fighting crime, making arrests when all pieces are there

law enforcement

Front 10

service style

Back 10

takes requests seriously, suburban communities

service

Front 11

federal law enforcement

Back 11

focus on investigative, homeland security, specific enforcement responsibilities

Front 12

state law enforcement

Back 12

general enforcement, liquir law, state crime lab

Front 13

county law enforcement

Back 13

county jail, court protection, civil papers

Front 14

Minneapolis experiment

Back 14

arresting domestic abusers made a difference, perhaps became more sneaky

Front 15

private policing

Back 15

runs into controversy
more private policing than public
are they guardian angels or vigilantes

Front 16

right to use force

Back 16

threat of force on police sets what force police can use

Front 17

kansas city experiment

Back 17

0, 1, 2x police. None changed crime #s at all.

Front 18

operational stress

Back 18

shift hours stress

Front 19

organizational stress

Back 19

being a police officer in uniform

Front 20

purging the taint

Back 20

along with silver platter doctrine, police get info after they already know of it illegally

Front 21

police discretion

Back 21

Enforcement:
Total: impossible
full: the goal
actual: actual
selective: avoid

Front 22

jacob's factors of police discretion

Back 22

nature of the crime
relationship btwn offender and victim
relate btwn police and offender/victim
departmental policy

Front 23

police subculture

Back 23

cynicism, stress, bonding

Front 24

skolnick's working personality

Back 24

danger and authority

Front 25

symbolic assailants

Back 25

perceptual shorthand that is used to id certain kinds of people as suspicious

Front 26

external stress

Back 26

real dangers involving police work

Front 27

personal stress

Back 27

life, marriage, home, relationships

Front 28

miranda trigger

Back 28

rights read before questioning 1960

Front 29

brown v mississippi

Back 29

rubber hose confession. coerced confessions forbidden to convict persons of crimes. 1930

Front 30

exclusionary rule

Back 30

excludes illegally seized evidence from court proceedings federally

Front 31

fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine

Back 31

any illegal evidence that leads to more evidence is also not admissible in court

Front 32

weeks v US

Back 32

exclusionary rule created but only for federal cases

Front 33

silver platter doctrine

Back 33

way police got around exclusionary rule. it only applied federally so feds would give state police illegal evidence and claim that they found it and then use it

Front 34

mapp v ohio

Back 34

any evidence that was illegally obtained by the police would be inadmissible in ANY court 1960

Front 35

good faith exception

Back 35

if police are acting in good faith or close enough the evidence is admissible.

Front 36

probable cause

Back 36

a crime was committed and this person did it

Front 37

public safety exception

Back 37

you can ask questions regarding public safety before reading miranda rights

Front 38

terry v ohio

Back 38

stop and frisk legal 1960

Front 39

plain view doctrine

Back 39

if you see evidence in plain view it is admissible in court

Front 40

protective sweep doctrine

Back 40

you can check a building for dangers to police

Front 41

inevitable discovery

Back 41

someone confesses during coercion and tells where the body is it is not admissible in court. But if it is in a spot where you would have found it eventually anyway it can still be used in court

Front 42

stop and frisk

Back 42

person can be patted down for weapons on the street if police have a suspicion

Front 43

grass eaters v meat eaters

Back 43

two police personalities, grass will just accept illegal money, meat will go looking for it

Front 44

slippery slope

Back 44

one small thing will turn into major corruption

Front 45

fleeing felon rule

Back 45

can use force against a fleeing felon is they pose a threat to the police

Front 46

tennessee v garner

Back 46

creates fleeing felon rule 1980

Front 47

internal affairs units

Back 47

take into account complaints by anyone
suspicions of corruption
situations where officers are killed/wounded
citizens killed/wounded by police
situations where police discharge weapons

Front 48

section 1983 lawsuits

Back 48

authorizes lawsuits for violations of constitutional rights.

Front 49

escobedo v illinois

Back 49

accused person permitted to have an attorney 1960