• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

positivists theories on suicide: Durkheim

Positivists: sociology is a science as we can observe society and explain actions through cause and effect



Durkheim: discovered patterns in suicide and its social causes



1. suicide is socially constructed


2. suicide is a social fact


3. not an individual act



+ suicide shouldn't have any patterns if it was a personal act

Theories Durkheim rejects

> D studied suicide to prove that it cannot be explained by psychology

> e.g. Jews suffered from more psychological problems than protestants but committed less suicide


- Psychology was in early stages at the time - has expanded since




> Rejected the theory that climate has an effect on suicide rates


+ suicide rates remain mostly constant over time

Durkheim's quantitative findings

1. Different societies have different rates



2. Rates varied between social groups



+ e.g Catholic had lower rates than Protestants


and married women with children lower than singled or widowed



3. Suicide rates within a society remained more or less constant over time



+ changes coincided with other changes e.g. increase with economic depression

Durkheim's explanations for suicide




(two Social facts)

1. social integration: a sense of belonging to a group and obligation to its members


> strong bond and sense of duty to others




2. moral regulation: the extent to which individuals' actions and desires are kept in check by norms and values


> no socially defined goals + rules desires are infinite and unsatisfying




> At the right amounts these create social solidarity but an imbalance can lead to high suicide rates)




e.g. detaining people for too long without charge

4 types of suicide: Egoistic

1. egoistic (more common in industrial societies)


> weak social integration




e.g: Catholics have a lower rate than protestants because they are tightly integrated into shared ritual




+ Marxists agree with alienation factor i.e. w/c not integrated but exploited




+ homeless 9 x more likely to commit suicide due to lack of integration




- many homeless have addictions and psychological disorders







4 types of suicide: Altruistic

2. Altruistic


> too much integration


> individuals sacrifice themselves out of duty to their group




e.g:



  • hindu wives after husbands death
  • kamikaze pilots: more pilots volunteered than there were planes, most aged 17 -24
- more influenceable?



+ balanced integration supports Hirschi's bonds of attachment theory: more connections to society = less inclination to crime

4 types of suicide: anomic

3. Anomic suicide: (Anomie = normlessness)


> weak social regulation


> norms and values became outdated or blurred from sudden change


> individuals feel unguided




e.g. economic booms (expectations/desires rise quicker than they are filled)


and slumps (wall st stock exchange crash 1929 lead to great depression 1930s)

4 types of suicide: Fatalistic

4. fatalistic suicide


> extreme moral regulation




> societies control individuals completely like slaves or prisoners, in concentration camps.




>individual sees no possible way to improve his or her life




e.g:


  • N.Korea has high suicide rates
  • Women's fatalistic suicide in Iran- high rates of social control causes increase in suicide

suicide in modern and traditional societies

modern societies:


  • very individualistic, (low social integration) causes egotistic suicides
  • rapid changes (low moral regulation) causes anomic suicides



Traditional societies:


  • importance of groups (high social integration) causes altruistic suicides
  • ascribed status (high moral regulation) cause fatalistic suicides.

Evaluation of Durkheim's theory of suicide


+ praised for positive data and scientific aims




- unreliable statistics:


  • lack of national administrative capabilities to store and collect data
  • autopsies not carried out as regular procedure to determine suicide



- lack of operationalisation:


  • Gibbs and martin: attempted to define integration as stable status integration



- lack of validity:


  • Atkinson: coroners reports invalid as there were often censorship on family deaths
  • Ecological fallacy: D's conclusions based on false data
  • Poppel and day: protestants deaths not categorized as a suicide due to bias



- overestimated the role of religion


  • Halbwachs: living in urban areas was also a key factors



- interactionists view: can't categorize human behaviour, too reductionists




- interpretivists: seek the meaning of suicide for those involved



interactionist theories on suicide: Douglas

Douglas: interested in the meaning of suicide for deceased and the way coroners label death.




Douglas' criticisms of Durkheim




  1. official stats: suicide is social construction not fact as a death is determined a suicide by the coroner (bias)

> Integration effects the likelihood of a death being labelled as a suicide

e.g. a good level of integration that causes low suicide rates may be due to many family/friends - cover up suicide due to guilt/ destroy evidence



2. Actor’s meanings and qualitative data: Durkheim ignores that suicide means something to suicidal, views it as fixed meaning for all


e.g. suicide is contextually and culturally bound in meaning




Douglas: classify each suicide using qualitative data (suicide notes, diaries, interviews with survivors and family.)

4 categories of suicide according to Douglas

  • As a means of transforming the self; releasing strains of the world

  • As a means of transforming themselves for others; show others how profound an issue is

  • As a means of achieving fellow feelings; asking for help or sympathy



  • As a means of gaining revenge; believe they have been forced into it



Douglas: these can vary culturally

Evaluation of Douglas

- Douglas classifies suicide based on a supposed meaning (how is his interpretation of a death any better than the coroners?)




-Sainsbury and Barraclough: effect of coroners exaggerated (suicide rates for immigrants in US correlated with rates from home countries, despite different coroners)




- Atkinson: we can never truly know the true suicide rate




- Douglas is inconsistent:


says coroners view /statistics are wrong but also says we can find meanings (but we can't know if a 'suicide' is a suicide as all we have to go are coroners reports.)

Interpretivist theories on suicide: Atkinson

Ethnomethodology: argues that social reality is just a construct of its members



>Atkinson:


+ agrees with Douglas- suicide rates are coroners interpretations


- disagrees with Douglas- we can't find the deceased's meaning of their suicide




> focuses on how coroners categorize deaths using qualitative methods




> coroners and officials categorize death as suicide using commonsense theory




> e.g. factors such as suicide notes, mode of death, location, life history and mental health affects the chance of death being labeled as a suicide

Evaluation of Atkinson

-Hindress: objective truth needed not interpretations


if there is only interpretations of the social world, ethnomethodologists' accounts are no more than interpretations




+ most ethnomethodologists admit their accounts are just interpretations





Realism and suicide: Taylor

- suicide rates can't be taken as valid


- coroners theories influence their verdicts


> e.g. in a study 32 died after being hit by a tube train over half were deemed suicides without conclusive evidence




+ believes we can explain suicide/ discover real patterns and causes but using case studies

Taylors 4 types of suicide

1. Submissive suicide: certainty about oneself (they know they have no future-Terminal illness)



2. Thanatation suicide: uncertainty about oneself, (uncertain about what others think) Risk taking




3. Sacrifice suicide: certainty about others (they want a person who has made their life unbearable feel guilty and responsible)




4. Appeal suicides: involves uncertainty about others (doubts their importance to others), takes an overdose and hopes that they are found

Evaluation of Taylor and realism

+ examines both successful and unsuccessful attempts




+ explains the severity of a suicide and why some leave notes and not others




- theory is based on interpretations of the actors meanings -can't validate




- case study: small sample size hard to generalize




- doesn't link to wider social issue like Durkheim