• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/38

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

38 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Baumester & Leary's 2 goals
1. discuss empircal findings in support of the belongingness hypothesis
2. Discuss the applicability of the need to belong to understanding behavior
B & L's 9 predictions
1. operate in variety of settings
2. have emotional consequences
3. have consequences for cognition
4. have negative consequences if not fulfilled
5. "elicit goal oriented behavior desined to satify" this need
6. apply to everyone
7. not derive from other motives
8. affect a variety of behaviors
9. have implications ofr other areas of study
Scientific method
Ask a Question
Do Background Research
Construct a Hypothesis
Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results
pros and cons to a self report
P: easy and inexpensive
C: ppl can be influenced by the way the question is asked
ppl can answer dishonestly
Friendship (difference than CR)
-no blood ties
-no romantic/sexual elements
- no contractual nature of work relationships
cognitive consistancy
Friendship theory
-humans strive for balance or consistency in many aspects of their lives, including relationships
developmental theory
friendship theory:
discuss how relationships change over time
Attatchment styles
AINSWORTH

securly: secure base, initially upset, happy uppon arival
anxiously: upset, doesnt calm down, clingy and avoident when mom comes back
avoidant: doesnt notice
What is giving based on in a communal relationship
based on what i needed
things to consider regarding cross sex friendship
1. Romance is risky.. ends up negative if relationship doesnt work
2. firend with benifits doesnt mean they are romatically involved
3. difficult to manage.. firendship styles are diff for men and women and could always lead to romance and or sex
What prediction do beumester and leary say is least supported
#7 that belongingness is not derived from other motives
what 3 elements does attacthment involve
1. physical contact
2. consistancy
3. stability
B & L need to belong consists of what
1. frequent & emotionaly pleasant interactions w/ @ least a few others
2. stability of these affectional relationships over time
what is the most effective kind of social support
support that is voluntary and nongrudgingly
describe a joint outcome matrix and give an example
when couples evaluate shared rewards and costs in addtion to the individual ones
ex: newly married couple 7 & 3 if they move to dallas both jobs will be 6 so they yshould move
concepts of substituation and satiation
substitution: relationships can be replaced0- some more difficult than others
satiation: meet your relationship quota "too much of a good thing" diminishing returns after weve met our relationship quota
how should a researcher choose the method they use
allow question to guide method
exchange relationships
(5 things)
1. rewards
2. costs
3. companion level
4. outcomes
5.comparision level for alternatives
2 diff types of interviews
1. unstructured
2. structured
what is different about friendship as a close relationsip
it is more voluntary than others
how do B & L justify unrequited love as actually supporting belongingness hypothesis
loves satiation needs may already be met and lovers may often be distressed by lovers
prediction 6 and why should it be regarded as tenative
-the need to belong applies to everyone and therefore has an evolutionary basis..

and because inateness and unvesality cant be proven
3 factors when studying contemperary relationships
1. increased knowledge
2. diversity
3. context
how do friendships usually deteriorate
usually people just drift apart
correlational research
identify relationsihps between variables and looks at how two variables co vary together
reasearch most commonly used by relationship researchers
self report
social estrangment
having no social ties at all
prediction 2
the need to belong should have emotional consequences

evidence: people are joyous about new relationships, anxious about losing relationships, depressed when lost relationships, and lonely without relationships.. happiness is correlated with relationships
reinforcment theory - equity
extension of exchange theory that is concerned with fairness in relationships based on peopled desire to
1. maximize personal outcomes, 2, be rewarded for what they do, 3, minimize incidneces of inequitable treatment (being overbenifited or underbenifited
communal relationships
can be friend, family, romantic
gives rewards or punishment because they are needed not to get something out of it
4 levels of forming and maintaning friendship
1. environmental, individual, dyadic, situational
DIES
friendship budget
depends on the # of new friendships you feel could be sustaned given existing friendships and demans of family and employment

http://books.google.com/books?id=sVv-wkEEtpkC&pg=PA72&lpg=PA72&dq=what+is+a+%22friendship+budget%22+close+relationships&source=bl&ots=e0oxIEv3Je&sig=7DGYBMkQ8ON3lAclkeBfP2QCRmQ&hl=en&ei=TctnS5TtG4_0Ne252IsG&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CAcQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=&f=false
childhood friendships
rose and asher: alleviaets loneliness, buffers victimization and bullying, aids school adjustent
adolescent friendships
primary task=friendship
evolve out of family relationsihps
-a training ground for romantic relationships
-friendships become central as opposed to family during this time
young adult friendships
maintain friendships by being supportive, spending time, and self discolising. may receed in importance with a new romantic relationship
older adult friendships
fewer but close friendship, can be much more difficult to make new ones
gender
women talk more, men do more
-women are more validating, men are more competitive
-men dont lack the capacity for intamy but women exercise their capacity more
-importance of corss sex friendships for men
rawlins dialects
-independence/dependence
-affection/instrumentality
-judgement/ acceptance