Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
36 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
two broad categories of support
|
clarification support
proof support |
|
cloarification support
|
used to prevent confusion or misunderstanding in our message
|
|
effective way to provide clarification is...
|
the use of definitions, examples, or additional information
|
|
proof support
|
adds crdibility
show something is trrue proves or supports a point |
|
three guidelines for using support material
|
support should be appropriate
support should be accurate give credit where credit is due |
|
all guidelines to effective support
|
know what you want to accomplish (clarify or prove)
qualify your sources intergrate your sources use relevant support use appropriate support use accurate support give credit where credit is due |
|
5 types of support
|
definitions
examples comparisons testimony statistics |
|
definition
|
primarily used for clarification support because the explain, or clarify terms, jargon, acronyms, or concepts
|
|
examples
|
used for both clarification and proof support
|
|
2 types of examples
|
real life
imaginary (jokes or parables) |
|
comparisons
|
most frequently used to clarify relationships
|
|
types of comparisons
|
metaphor
contrast simile |
|
metaphor
|
figure of speech used to compare two things
compares something concrete to something abstract joe is a fast burner |
|
contrast
|
most used comparison in military writing
contrast old vs new or advantages vs disadvantages |
|
simile
|
jsut like the metaphor only less direct
uses like or as |
|
two common types of proof support
|
testimony
statistics |
|
testimony
|
information we take from experts or expert documentation to support our communication
|
|
3 methods for using testimony
|
direct quotation
quotation with omissions paraphrase |
|
direct quotation
|
quote someone word for word without omissions
|
|
quotation with omissions
|
we quote only part of what someone has said or written
|
|
paraphrase
|
borrowing information from someone else and putting it in your own words
|
|
three rules for using testimony
|
1 remember the general guidelines for support material
2 keep your testimony as brief as possible 3 use your testimony in context don't bend it to make it say what you'd like it to say |
|
3 types of statistical support
|
ratios
percentages raw numbers |
|
ratios
|
a numerical comparison of two or more things
|
|
percentages
|
a figure that reflects a portion of something when compared to the whole
example: in a typical SNCO academy class of 360 only 5% are reservists |
|
raw numbers
|
numbers that haven't been cooked yet we take them as they are--they haven't been manipulated
|
|
rules for using statistics
|
round off
use sparingly dramatize recency context |
|
2 most common reasoning fallacies
|
slanted reasoning
emotional appeals |
|
slanted reasoning
|
arises from the misuse or lack of data
|
|
types of slanted rasoning
|
hasty generalization
faulty dilemma: offers two alternatives, one the communicator wants us to accept and one that he knows we will question or never accept faulty analogy: based on the assumption that what is true of a simple or familiar situation is also true of a complex or complicated one stacking the evidence: consists of distorting or omitting imprtant evidence to get a point across the loaded question: When are we going to stop sinking money into this expensive program? |
|
emothional appeals
|
name calling
glittering generality smob or prestige appeal plain folks appeal bandwagon appeal |
|
name calling
|
the habit of giving undesirable names to things or people you dislike
|
|
glittering generality
|
giving an admirable name to something that we want others to accept
|
|
snob or prestige appeal
|
attempt to have us seek an ever higher social status
|
|
plain folks appeal
|
opposite of the snob appeal
status is looked upon with contempt the simple things in life are worth having |
|
bandwagon appeal
|
it asks receivers to accept an idea without examination and to believe it because their working group or social group believes it
|