• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/19

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

19 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
accountability policies/procedures
imnate movement-who, where
supervision-direct and indirect
work and treatment programs
components of mental healt
continum of care-various levels of profe. to diagnose med
imnate categories of SHU
admin. deten.
disiplinary seg
inmate protection, staff prot
awaiting transfer or disipinary hearing
cooper v pate
ended hands off doctorine
religious rights- clear and present danger std.
holt v sarver
reasonable sensitivity stand.
cruel and unusual punishment
wilson v seiter
deliberate indifference
gregg v georgia
death penalty 2 trials (BIFURICATED)
1 to convict 2 mitigating/aggrivating circumstances
solem v helm
test of proportionality-what other institutions are implementing
accredidation
90% safety stand
65% of all institutions
sentencing and corrections based on
retrobution, deterence, determinate,incapacitation
reduce cost
user fees
reduce spending by consolidating services
BFOQ
bona fide occupational qualifications
slow growth rate
economy, natural decline, increased use of alternatives,
searches
strip, pat,cell, area
accountability as inmates move
controlled movement, pass systems, call outs
causes of riots
environmental, precipitating event
ER response teans
hostage, disturbence, special
lawsuits
declined since 1995
pugh v locke
totality of conditions