term1 Definition1term2 Definition2term3 Definition3
Please sign in to your Google account to access your documents:
- C cannot recover for damage that was not legally caused by D's breach of duty.
- Unable to claim damages that are too remote
The Wagon Mound No.1
The Reasonable Foreseeability Test
- D was not liable for the damage as it was too remote, it was not reasonably foreseeable that the oil would catch on fire.
- Type of damage must be reasonably foreseeable
Bradford v Robinson Rentals
The Type or Kind of Damage
Hughes v Lord Advocate
How the Damage Arises
Jolley v Sutton
Smith v Leech Brain and Co
The Extent of the Damage
The Wagon Mound No.2
Need help typing ? See our FAQ (opens in new window)
Please sign in to create this set. We'll bring you back here when you are done.
Discard Changes Sign in
Please sign in to add to folders.
Sign in
Don't have an account? Sign Up »
You have created 2 folders. Please upgrade to Cram Premium to create hundreds of folders!