Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
14 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Partridge v Crittenden 1968 |
Offer in a newspaper is ITT |
|
|
British pharmaceutical society v Boots cash chemists 1953 |
Items on a shelf are ITT |
|
|
Carhill v Catholic Smoke Ball Company 1892 |
Established unilateral contracts and acceptance of these contracts need not be communicated |
|
|
Harvey v Facey 1893 |
A mere statement of price is not an offer |
|
|
Byrne v Van Tienhoven 1880 |
Communication of revocation must be recieved |
|
|
Errington v Errington & Woods 1951 |
Revocation of a unilateral offer |
|
|
Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore 1866 |
Offers can lapse after a reasonable time |
|
|
Hyde v Wrench 1840 |
Counter offers destroy original offers |
|
|
Stevenson Jaques & Co v McLean 1880 |
Requests for information do not destroy offers |
|
|
Felthouse v Brindley 1862 |
Silence will never constitute acceptance |
|
|
Adams v Lindsell 1818 |
Postal rule |
|
|
Balfour v Balfour 1919 |
Family members presumed to not be creating legal relations |
|
|
Brinkibon v Stahag Stahl 1983 |
No single rule that covers non-instantaneous communication |
|
|
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway 1877 |
Acceptance can be inferred by conduct |
