• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
In Va, how does a person acquire a domicile of choice?
a. Physical presence in that state
b. The intent to remain there for the foreseeable future/indefinitely
In Va, what level of capacity does a person need to establish domicile voluntarily?
A person must have legal capacity
a. Capacity here means the ability to fend for yourself.
b. This is NOT the same as ordinary legal capacity.
In Va, what is the domicile for a child?
a. If the child is old enough to fend for himself, he can obtain a domicile of choice.
b. Otherwise, it is assigned by operation of law as the domicile of the parents (or whichever parents has physical custody).
What is the constitutional test for choice of law in a conflicts of laws situation?
Significant contact giving legitimate interest: the state chosen must have a significant contact or contacts with the parties or the subject matter of the litigation which gives it a legitimate interest in seeing the law of its state applied.
--From the DPC and the FFC clauses
--Usually this is an easy test to meet.
If after the event in question someone moves to a new state, and that would be the only contact with that state, would it be constitutional to apply that state’s law?
No, that would be unconstitutional.
If the only contact a state has with the litigation is that the suit is brought there, is that sufficient reason to apply that state’s law?
No, that would be unconstitutional.
Generally, what is Virginia's approach to choice of law in a conflict of laws situation?
Vested Rights Approach (aka Territorial Approach): The law to be applied is the law of the place where the rights of the plaintiff vested.
In a contracts case with a conflicts of law problem, how do you decide which state's law to apply under the vested rights approach?
Contract case: rights vest when the K is made
In a tort case with a conflicts of law problem, how do you decide which state's law to apply under the vested rights approach?
Tort case: apply law of place where injury occurred
What is the best strategy to use when applying the Vested Rights Approach to a choice of law question?
1) List the different laws in the problem
2) Characterize the issue in question (which area of law applies?)
3) Find the conflicts rule that applies to that area (i.e., if there’s a standard of care, use the tort law standard)
4) Look for defenses to application of the law under this rule
In a choice of law problem, what are the exceptions to the general rule than in a tort case, you apply the law of the place where the injury occurred?
i) Where there is a rule regulating conduct (i.e., a rule setting out the exact conduct a person must take, e.g., a highway speed limit)
ii) For the tort of defamation, apply the law of the place of publication
In a choice of law question, in a contracts case, when is a forum selection clause valid, if the issue is one of contract validity?
For matters of validity of a K, the parties can choose the law provided: (1) the choice is not contrary to public policy of the state that would otherwise be chosen, (2) there is a reasonable relationship of the chosen state to the parties or the transaction, (3) the choice was not obtained by unfair means or under duress.
In a choice of law question, in a contracts case, when is a forum selection clause valid, if the issue is one of contract construction?
For matters of contract construction, the parties can ALWAYS choose whatever law they want
In a choice of law question, in a contracts case, what is the choice of law rule if the UCC applies?
i) If the UCC applies to the transaction, the case is governed by the law of the forum so long as the forum has a substantial relationship to the transaction
In a choice of law question, in a contracts case, what is the rule of validation?
In usury cases, the court will apply the law of the state that will uphold the validity of the transaction as long as the state has some relation to the transaction.
In a choice of law case, if the UCC doesn't apply, there is no forum selection clause, and the issue is not usury, what law applies?
Depends on the questions at issue in the case:
i) For questions of validity, formalities, and contract formation: the law is that of the place of making of the contract (the last place where the last act took place creating the K—usually the place of acceptance)
ii) For questions of performance: choose the law of the place of performance of the K
In a choice of law question, if the case involves real property, what are the choice of laws rules?
i) For matters regarding land contracts: apply the contracts rules
ii) For matters regarding conveyances: the law of the situs (i.e., location) of the property governs
In a choice of law question, if the case involves personal property, what are the choice of laws rules (with exceptions)?
General rule: The law of the place where the personal property is located is chosen
--Exceptions
a) If the issue is passing personal property by intestate succession, then the state chosen is the state of the decedent’s domicile at death
b) If the UCC rules of secured transactions apply, the state is that of the debtor’s residence or place of business
In a choice of law question, if the case involves family law, what are the choice of laws rules?
For validity of a marriage, choose the law where the marriage was celebrate
--Exception: Va will not apply the law of a state if the marriage is incestuous, polygamous, or otherwise violative of Va law
For the purpose of a choice of law issue, is the following a "procedural" law: burden of proof?
Yes
For the purpose of a choice of law issue, is the following a "procedural" law: statute of limitations? What is the exception?
Yes, it's procedural, but it will NOT be used if there is a borrowing statute (a statute that will borrow and apply the shorter statute of limitations of the state where the cause of action arose to avoid forum shopping)
In a federal case on diversity, what choice of law rules apply?
A federal court sitting in diversity must use that state’s choice of law rules