Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
25 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Carlill v Carbolic smokeball company
|
Invitation to treat
|
|
|
Hyde v Wrench
|
Counter offer
|
|
|
Chaplin v Hicks
|
Breach of contract
|
|
|
Stevenson Jacques v McLean
|
Postal rule / Breach of contract
|
|
|
Re McArdle
|
Past consideration
|
|
|
Donoghue v Stevenson
|
Negligence - Notion of foreseeability and neighbour principle
|
|
|
Bourhill v Young
|
Negligence - Neighbour principle, physical remoteness
|
|
|
Dorset yacht v Home Office
|
Duty of care owed to those in physical proximity
|
|
|
Meah v McMcreamer
|
Negligence - Temporal proximity (time lag)
|
|
|
Bolton v Stone
|
Cricket ball hit lady (6) - Risk allocation in breach of duty of care
|
|
|
Wagon mound
|
Remoteness of harm - 'real risk'
|
|
|
Paris v Stepney Borough Council
|
Eggskull shell rule - Employee with one eye
|
|
|
Helson v Mckenzies
|
Defence against negligence - contributory negligence
|
|
|
Hedley byrne v Heller
|
Negligent misstatement - Disclaimer, not liable
|
|
|
Caparo v Dickman
|
Defendant and plaintiff have no contact, but defendant likely to be relied on - No Liability
|
|
|
Diamond manufacturing v Hamilton
|
Plaintiff and Defendant have communicated directly or indirectly - Liability likely
|
|
|
Keech v Sandford
|
Basis of fiduciary duty
|
|
|
Clark Boyce v Mouat
|
No conflict - Same matter conflict
|
|
|
Aas v Bentham
|
No competition - Ship broker firm, different industry
|
|
|
Witten-hannah v Davis
|
No conflict - fair dealing conflict
|
|
|
Bentley v Craven
|
No profit - Secret profiteering
|
|
|
Reading v AG
|
Misuse of principals property
|
|
|
Russel McVeagh McKenzie Bartleet & Co v. Tower corp
|
Chinese wall
|
|
|
Beckmann v Mayceys confectionary
|
Copyright - objective similarity
|
|
|
Levi Strauss v Kimbyr investments
|
Trademark - Colour of tag on pocket
|
