Reading...
Play button
Play button
Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
15 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Cross v Davidson
|
Acceptance must be complete and unqualified
|
|
|
McMahon v Gilberd
|
Acceptance must come from intended offeree
|
|
|
Hyde v Wrench
|
Counter offer is rejection of initial offer
|
|
|
Dickson v Dodds
|
Revocation validly communicated through 3rd party
|
|
|
Stevenson Jacques v Mclean
|
Offer with indulgence
|
|
|
Adams v Lindsell
|
Postal rule
|
|
|
Warlow v Harrison
|
Auction without reserve - auctioneer has obligation to accept the highest bid
|
|
|
Pratt contractors Ltd v transit NZ
|
Implied obligation to assess tenders fairly and in good faith
|
|
|
Balfour v Balfour
|
Social / domestic agreements
|
|
|
Jones v Vernon's pools Ltd
|
Agreements binding in honor only are not legally enforceable
|
|
|
Hammer v Sidway
|
Legal detriment is good consideration
|
|
|
In re Mcardle
|
Past consideration is no consideration (sufficient)
|
|
|
Lampleigh v Brathwait
|
executed consideration
|
|
|
In re Murphy
|
consideration doesn't need to be adequate, only sufficient.
|
|
|
Carlill v Carbolic smoke ball company
|
-Unilateral contract / reward
- commercial agreements usually intended to be binding -completion of conduct is consideration and acceptance in unilateral offers |
