Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
54 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
why do people make errors in eyewitness testimony? |
1. errors associated with perception and attention--inaccurate or insufficient encoding, weapons effect 2. misidentifications due to familiarity--causes source confusion 3. errors due to suggestion--misinformation effect |
|
guidelines for preserving eyewitness testimony |
1.open ended questions and caution against guessing 2. using line up (eg sequential, not simultaneous |
|
cognitive interview for preserving eyewitness memory |
1. mental reinstatement 2. reporting the incident in different orders and from different viewpoints |
|
recovered memories |
1. some cases may be recovered but due to false memory 2. it is possible to implant false "recovered" memories in a lab setting (imagination inflation paradigm and lost in the mall study) |
|
flashbulb memories |
people can vividly recall how they learned about a hightly emotional event. might not necessarily be accurate |
|
emotion and memory |
emotions can make an event more memorable but can also distort memories--direct attention to only specific aspects, trigger (unwarrented) inferences |
|
sevin sins of memory |
1. transience (forgetting over time) 2. absentmindedness (insufficient encoding due to a lack of attention) 3.blocking (failing to retrieve the information when you need it 4.source misattribution (cannot remember where the info actually came from) 5. suggestibility (influenced by later suggestion or misleading information) 6. bias (influenced by our knowledge, prior experience, beliefs etc) 7. persistance (some memories don't go away, even though you don't want it) |
|
sins of omission |
1. transcience 2. absentmindedness 3. blocking |
|
sins of commision |
1. source misattribution 2. suggestibility 3. bias |
|
retina |
receives an image of a stimulus, and receptor cells convert light energy into neural impulses |
|
rods |
1. concentrated in the periphery 2. operate at low light (good for night vision) 3. lead to colorless sensation |
|
cones |
1.concentrated in the foveal region (center) 2. respond at high levels of illumination (good for day vision) 3.responsible for color sensations (3 types of cones--blue, green, red wavelength) |
|
where do neural impluses go? |
primary visual cortex |
|
where does stimuli in the left visual field go |
right hemisphere |
|
where does stimuli in right visual field go? |
left hemisphere |
|
two cortical pathways |
1. dorsal (where) pathway 2. ventral (what" pathway |
|
dorsal |
1. goes to the parietal lobe. 2. processes spatial information (location) |
|
ventral |
1. temporal lobe 2. processes visual information (shape, color) |
|
things dominant in left |
1. many aspects of language processing 2. processing "local" information |
|
things dominant in the right hemisphere |
1. many aspects of visuospatial 2. processing of "global" information |
|
left hand and left visual field word recognized? |
no |
|
left hand and left visual field correct object taken? |
yes |
|
right hand and left visual field word recognized? |
no |
|
left visual field and right hand correct object taken? |
no |
|
right visual field and left hand word recognized? |
yes |
|
right visual field and left hand correct object taken? |
no |
|
right visual field and right hand word recognized? |
yes |
|
right visual field and right hand correct object taken? |
yes |
|
left hemisphere controls what hand? |
right |
|
right hemisphere controls what hand |
left |
|
fovea |
point of central focus in the retina |
|
how do we perceive objects and scenes? |
bottom up and top down processing |
|
bottom up sources |
information directly available with stimulation of receptors (2D image projected onto the retina). wavelengths of light (for color) and visual features (eg line orientation) |
|
top down sources |
additional information based on prior experiences, knowledge, and context |
|
top down (conceptually drive) processing |
driven by what we already know from our prior experiences and contexts |
|
bottom up (data driven) processing |
driven by the analysis of the input given |
|
what plays a crucial role in bottom up processing? |
analysis of visual features. some neurons are known ot be sensitive to simple features--our recognition of letters are affected by visual features |
|
recognition of letters theory |
pandemonium model |
|
recognition of common objects theory |
recognition by components (RBC) theory |
|
pandemonium model of letter recognition |
purely bottom up, one way flow of information. no top down influence |
|
recognition by components (RBC) theory |
each object can be decomposed into basic elements (features). we recognize objects identifying these elements (called geons) and their configurations |
|
evidence for the RBC theory |
indentifying basic features (geons) is important for the recognition of simple drawings |
|
limitations of purely bottom up processing |
the information directly available to the receptors (eg the 2D image on the retina) is often ambiguous (THE CAT)--additional sources of information (top down processing) are necessary to efficiently resolve such ambiguities |
|
top down sources of information |
additional information based on our prior experiences, knowledge, and context. uses consistent perceptual cues or principles acquired through experience, knowledge and expectations, and contextual cues |
|
consistent perceptual cues or principles acquired through experience |
gestalt principles of perception and use of depth/distance cues |
|
gestalt principles of perception |
we use the regularities in the visual world learned from our experiences to guide our perception (top down processing)--columns/rows of dots example and rings |
|
use of depth/distance cues |
we use the regularities in the visual world learned from our experiencesto guide our perception (top down processing)--ponzo illusion with railway--object further away is smaller so lines are not same size even though they are |
|
examples of top down processing |
in all cases, prior knowledge, expectations, and context influence the way you perceive the stimulus (visual or auditory) |
|
jumbled word effect |
the ability to read words in sentences despite having mixed up letters in the middle of some words |
|
phoneme (or phonemic) restoration effect |
listeners automatically fill in missing sounds, using context as a cue ex it was found that the *eel was on the shoe |
|
word superiority effect |
single letters are better identified in words than in nonwords or by themselves |
|
how can we explain the word superiority effect? |
interactive activation model of word recognition |
|
interactive activation model vs pandemonium model similarities |
similar to pandemonium model in that there are different levels and each node does its own job |
|
interactive activation model vs pandemonium model differences |
competing nodes try to inhibit one another and interactive activation model has bi directional flow of information--bottom up and top down processing |