• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/29

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

29 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

3 elements for deterance

Swift proportionate certain

Boykin V. Alabama

A guilty plea must include an affirmative showing that it was intelligent and voluntary.

NC V Alford

Alford plea- can't plea guilty and protest your innocence

Strickland V Washington

Right to counsel is violated by their inadequate performance

US V Ruiz

Govenrment isn't required to disclose material impeachment evidence prior to entering a plea agreement

Improper inducement

Being coerced into a deal you don't want

Bordenkircher V Hayes

Prosecutional vindictiveness

Williams V Newyork

Judges do not have to restrict sentencing decisions to information received in open court

Mathews balancing test

Determines if rights are violated by not seeing the PSI report for capital crimes

Mempa V Rhay

You have a right to council when any critical stage of prosecution where significant rights may be affected

Allocation

Right to speak on your own behalf

Elements of crime

Trial-beyond a reasonable doubt

Sentencing factors

Sentencing- preponderance of evidence

McMillan v penn

Doesn't increase max sentence

Appredi v NJ

Can't increase a maximum sentence of a criminal unless it is proven to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt

Blakely v washington

Prove to a jury if you want to enhance a sentence

Grayson v US

This could reflect badly on rehab prospects so it is not a denial of due process

Exclusionary rule

Any evidence obtained illegally can't be used

Criminal involvement

Prior aquittal does not mean the conduct can't be considered at sentencing

Booth v Maryland

Unacceptable risk that jury would apply death penalty based on victim impact statements

Payne v Tennessee

Allowed victim impact statements

Richardson v Ramirez

Felons could be barred from voting

Hunter v underwood

Overturned disenfranchisement

Megan's law

Have to go on a registry

Kansas v Hendricks

Doesn't violate double jep. People who are not able to control themselves can be confined

Kansas v Crane

Dependent must be likely to commit sexualy violent crimes in the future.

ABA standards

Collateral and discretionary disqualifications

Collateral

Auto

Discretionary disqualifications

Discretionary