• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Social process that occurs when rewards (tangible or intangible - get something or not, i.e. trophy) distributed unequally based on individual’s performance compared to others participating in same event

Competition

1. Objective Situation


2. Subjective Situation


3. Response


4. Consequence/Outcomes

Marten's Model

Performancecompared to standard ofexcellence in the presence of one or more individuals aware of comparison. Situation is the same for all athletes.

Objective Situation

Howathletes interpret,perceive and appraise the objective competitivesituation

Subjective Situation

Howathletes responds tointerpretation (observed on a physiological, psychological, behavioural level)

Competitor's Response

Outcomes (typically dichotomous)

Consequences

1. Characteristics of a person


2. Perceived situational competitiveness


3. Actual environment

Murayama & Elliot (2012)

Person’stendency forcompetition; influencesinterpretation (i.e., traitcompetitiveness)

Characteristics of a person

Degree to which person interprets event as involving competition (i.e., subjective situation)

Perceived situational competitiveness

Structure of activity(i.e., objectivesituation)

Actual Environment

Desire to do well relative to others; Show they are better. Athletes with approach mindset play to win (eager, persistent, task-absorbed)

Performance Approach Goals

Desire to avoid doing poorly compared to others. Don’t look bad compared to others. Athletes play not to lose. Avoid failure. Avoid being compared. Hesitant. (worry, task-distraction, self-handicapping)

Performance Avoidance Goals

- Get to know athletes as individuals


- Separate performance outcomes from ‘goodness’


- Learn athletes’ motives for playing


- Understand how they respond to different types of feedback


- Understand what stresses them

Coach: Enhance approach goals and limit avoidance goals

1. Self-awareness


2. Self-management


3. Social awareness


4. Relationships


5. Responsible decision making

Life skills learned through sport

Self-esteem, self-monitoringand evaluation, goal setting

Self-awareness

Anger and stress management, time management, coping skills, controlling impulses

Self-management

Empathy, active listening, recognizing/appreciating individualand group differences

Social awareness

Negotiation, conflict management,resisting peer pressure,networking, motivation

Relationships

Information gathering, critical thinking, evaluating consequences of actions

Responsible decision making

Performanceadvantage … whatyou have when compete at homecompared with when play awayunder similar conditions

Home advantage

Social rewards/punishments based on external evaluation (it’s the knowledge of evaluation that influences arousal). Performance enhanced/impaired only in presence of others who approve/disapprove behaviour

Evaluation-Apprehension theory

Presence of others distracts attention,which is not on task at hand, and increases activation

Distraction-conflict hypothesis

Tendency towards self-assurance/enthusiasm (general and toward social environment). Is reflected in high extraversion and self-esteem

SF: Positive orientation

Tendency toward anxiety/apprehension. Is reflected in high neuroticism and low self-esteem

SF: Negative orientation