• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/24

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

24 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
The function of contract law
-Ensures compliance with a promise and entitles a nonbreaching party to relief when a contract is breached
-all contractual relationships involve promises, but all promises do not establish contractual relationships
-a promise for the breach of which the law gives a remedy or the performance of which the law recognizes as a duty (an agreement that can be enforced in court)
-may be formed when two or more parties promise to perform or to refrain from performing some act now or in the future
Contract
Requirements of a valid contract:
1) agreement
2) consideration
3) contractual capacity
4) legality
-this requirement includes an offer and acceptance
-one party must offer to enter into a legal agreement, and another party must accept the offer
- there must be a meeting of the minds
Agreement
-promises must be supported by legally sufficient and bargained-for consideration
Consideration
-these include characteristics that qualify the parties to a contract as competent
Contractual Capacity
-a contract's purpose must be to accomplish a goal that is not against public policy
Legality
Contract Formation
-Bilateral vs. Unilateal
-Formal vs. Informal
-Express vs Implied
-this is the premise for a promise to accept the offer, the offeree need only promise to perform
-a promise for a promise
Bilateral Contract
-this is a promise for an act-the offeree can accept only by performance
-a promise for an act
Unilateral Contract
-requires a special form for creation to be enforceable (i.e. negotiable instruments which include checks and other drafts, promissory notes, and certificates do deposit)
Formal Contract
-requires no special form for creation
Informal Contract
-formed by words
-fully and explicitly states the terms of the agreement in words (oral or written)
Express Contract
-formed by the conduct of the parties
Implied Contract
Requirements for an implied contract:
1) the plaintiff must have furnished some service or property
2) the plaintiff must have expected to be paid and the defendant knew or should have known that payment was expected
3) the defendant had a chance to reject the service or property and did not
-in the absence of an actual contract, a court may impose this type of contract to avoid the unjust enrichment of one party at the expense of the other
Quasi Contract
T/F: persons are not normally liable for benefits thrust on them
True
T/F: a quasi contract cannot be imposed if there is an actual contract that covers the area in controversy
True
-"as much as he or she deserves"
-essentially describes the extent of compensation owed under a contract implied in law
Quantum meruit
Interpretation of contracts includes:
-plan-language laws
-the plain meaning rule
-other rules of interpretation
-the federal government and most states require an agreement and other legal documents and forms to be written clearly, coherently, and in words of common, everyday meaning
Plan-language laws
-when writing is clear and unequivocal, it will be enforced according to its plain terms
-the meaning of the terms is determined from the written document alone
The plain meaning rule
Other rules of interpretation:
1) a reasonable, lawful, and effective meaning is given to all terms
2) a contract is interpreted as a whole; individual, specific clauses are considered subordinate to the contract's general intent. All writings that are a part of the same transaction are interpreted together.
3) terms that were negotiated separately are given greater consideration than standard terms and terms that were not negotiated separately.
4) a word is given its ordinary, common meaning, and a technical word it's technical meaning unless the parties clearly intended otherwise.
5) specific, exact wording is given greater weight than general language.
6) written or typewritten terms prevail over preprinted ones
7) when the language has more than one meaning, it is interpreted against the party who drafted the contract
8) evidence of usage of trade, course of dealing, and course of performance mat be admitted to clarify meaning
The two most import things in a contract:
1) WHO
2) WHAT