Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
22 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
--------- Has Changed Corporate Governance, Reporting, and Operations
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
|
|
-Setting parameters for personal and business behavior
-Setting tone of tolerance or intolerance for behavior |
Developing an Ethics Stance
|
|
Place where case begins
Jury hears cases and decides disputed issues of fact Single judge presides over case |
trial courts
|
|
reviews a trial court decision to check the conduct of the judge, the trial, the lawyers, and the jury.
|
appellate court
|
|
-Review actions of trial court
-Usually have published opinions for uniformity and consistency -No trials held - panel of judges hears case |
appellate court
|
|
what is the process of judicial review?
|
Determine whether error was made
Transcript is reviewed All other evidence is reviewed Parties submit written briefs to summarize the evidence and issues |
|
trial courts are often referred to as
|
lower courts
|
|
review by appellate court of decisons and actions of a lower court to determine whether reversible errors in procedure or law were made.
|
judicial review
|
|
how many judges are on a panel in an appellate court and a supreme court
|
3, 9
|
|
En banc
|
full bench hears case
|
|
a summary of the case and the legal issues being challenged on appeal
|
brief
|
|
lawyer's summation of issues of law and/or error for appellate court to consider.
|
appellate brief
|
|
what are possible actions of the reviewing court
|
Affirm—no reversible error and decision stands
Reverse—reversible error and decision is reversed Remand—error that requires further proceedings Modify—change ruling of lower court |
|
Courts at appellate level can review statutory application
Can determine scope of statute |
Statutory interpretation
|
|
Courts will follow previous decisions for --------
Previous decisions are called ------ |
consistency, precedent
|
|
Exceptions to stare decisis—when precedent may not be followed
|
-Cases are factually distinguishable
-Precedent is from another jurisdiction -Technology changes -Sociological, moral, or economic changes |
|
a dissenting opinion is
|
dicta
|
|
The -------- in the case is the precedent
------ is not the precedent ----- is the discussion of the relevant law |
rule of law, dicta, dicta
|
|
Initiate the lawsuit
Called petitioners in some cases |
Plaintiffs
|
|
Alleged to have violated some right of the plaintiff
Party named in the suit for recovery -Called respondents in some cases |
defendants
|
|
What kind of relationships do lawyers have with clients?
|
fiduciary
|
|
Those who act as advocates for plaintiffs and defendants
Have fiduciary relationship with clients Represent client and see that procedures are followed |
lawyers
|