Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
17 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Bettini v Gye |
Opera, Warranty but not a breach |
|
Varley v Whipp |
Second Hand Machine, Non-Performance |
|
Hoenig v Isaacs |
room painting, substantial performance |
|
Steele v Tardiani |
split wood, partial performance |
|
Holland v Wiltshire |
Land Resold, Late Performance |
|
Victoria Laundry ltd v Newman Industries |
Boiler, Direct loss |
|
Lumley V Wagner |
Theatre Singing, specific performance, not awarded |
|
Dougan v Ley and Another |
Taxi, Specific performance awarded |
|
Shaddock and Associates, v Parramatta City Council (1981) |
Road widening, Duty of care, yes |
|
Adeels Palace v Moubarak (2009) |
Restaurant fight, gun, security, duty of care |
|
Rogers v Whitaker |
Eye Surgury, not informed of risk, Establishing Duty of Care (step 1) |
|
Perre v Apand |
Potato Farm, P's farm exposed, Direct damages, Establishing harm ( step 3) |
|
Overseas Tankersjip v Miller Steamship |
oil spill in harbour, catches fire, reasonably foreseeable risk, Establishing Harm (step 3) |
|
Canny Gabriel Castle Jackson Advertising v Volume Salmes |
Joint Venture, found to be a partnership even with no written agreement. |
|
Turnbull v Ah Mouy |
Not a partnership, only a single venture |
|
Salomon v Salomon and Co |
Samon was separate entity to company |
|
AWA ltd v Daniels |
Duties of Directors |