Study your flashcards anywhere!

Download the official Cram app for free >

  • Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

How to study your flashcards.

Right/Left arrow keys: Navigate between flashcards.right arrow keyleft arrow key

Up/Down arrow keys: Flip the card between the front and back.down keyup key

H key: Show hint (3rd side).h key

A key: Read text to speech.a key

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/3

Click to flip

3 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING – FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACY

To buy this click here




http://www.coursehomework.com/product/bus-250-week-4-assignment-case-study-vidding-free-expression-or-copyright-piracy/






BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING - FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACYCase Study: Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? Read Case Study Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? At the end of Chapter 13 in your text. In one to two pages, supported by evidence from your text and from other research, respond to the following questions:Using the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4 (utilitarianism, rights, and justice), is the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or is it an infringement of intellectual property?Where do you draw the line when using material found on the Internet, but trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations? How different should a vid be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws?

BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING – FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACY

To buy this click here




http://www.coursehomework.com/product/bus-250-week-4-assignment-case-study-vidding-free-expression-or-copyright-piracy/






BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING - FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACYCase Study: Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? Read Case Study Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? At the end of Chapter 13 in your text. In one to two pages, supported by evidence from your text and from other research, respond to the following questions:Using the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4 (utilitarianism, rights, and justice), is the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or is it an infringement of intellectual property?Where do you draw the line when using material found on the Internet, but trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations? How different should a vid be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws?

BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING – FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACY

To buy this click here




http://www.coursehomework.com/product/bus-250-week-4-assignment-case-study-vidding-free-expression-or-copyright-piracy/






BUS 250 WEEK 4 ASSIGNMENT CASE STUDY VIDDING - FREE EXPRESSION OR COPYRIGHT PIRACYCase Study: Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? Read Case Study Vidding -- Free Expression or Copyright Piracy? At the end of Chapter 13 in your text. In one to two pages, supported by evidence from your text and from other research, respond to the following questions:Using the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4 (utilitarianism, rights, and justice), is the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or is it an infringement of intellectual property?Where do you draw the line when using material found on the Internet, but trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations? How different should a vid be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws?