• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/7

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

7 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

standard of care owed

foreseeable to a reasonable man

Waugh v James K Allen Ltd

Shows that it must be voluntary. Driver was sick and had suffered this attacks before. Passed and thought he was better and so decided to drive. Dropped dead at the wheel and ran over pedestrian. Not in control and so was not breach of duty.

Muir v Glasgow Corporation

Shows that the harm must be a reasonable and probable consequence. They asked for a room in a tearoom. Given access to the kitchen. Urn was dropped and scalded children. Not reasonable foreseeable

Malcolm v Dickson

Painter did work negligently which led to a fire. Someone was inside and tried to save valuables. He had a heart attack but was held that this was too remote

general state of human knowledge at the time

not what you know but what you should know

Roe v Minister of Health

Spinal anaesthetic used in operation which was kept in a fenel solution which is harmful. Micro cracks in the tube when ended up paralysing patient from waist down. No liability as they did not know of danger.

Hughes v Lord Advocate

A hole was unattended and boy and lamp fell in which resulted in an explosion. it was an improbable consequence. However, it was a known source of danger and so was liable.