• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/58

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

58 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Armand Cambon, The Republic, 1848


Jean-Louis-Ernest Meissonier, Memory of Civil War (The Barricades),1849

-Compare to images of the American civil war

Jean-François Millet, The Winnower, 1848

-anonymous blue collar worker

Jean-François Millet, The Gleaners, 1857

-Saying that they need a better share of theprofits because it’s their efforts that collected the stuff

-They aren’t land owners

Jules Breton, Blessing of the Wheat in the Artois, 1857

-church dominates the landscape

-yes, it’s realism, but it doesn’t threaten thestatus quo like Courbet


-represents a less radical, less socio-politicalrealism

Rosa Bonheur, Plowingin the Nivernais: The Dressing of Vines, 1849

-Truth to nature

-Photographic accuracy


-Looks a little more romantic because the animalsare doing all the work

Gustave Courbet, The Stonebreakers, 1849

-Lower class peasants. The lowest

-Almost life size


-Would’ve created shock


-Either born rich or poor


-Story of francis and what his future will bewithout change

Gustave Courbet, A Burial at Ornans, 1849

-Everyone is lined up at the same level

-Burial of some guy you don’t know in a hick town


-Not heroic, not romantic


-People looking bored at a funeral


-Looking at your own mortality


-People look like portraits, no idealizationgoing on

Gustave Courbet, The Young Ladies of the Village, 1852

-Not of the city.

-Nouvo-riche. New money


-Dog is a mutt


-No clear recession back into space. The cows aresmall but look like they’re on the same plane -Nothing remotely academic about this painting

Franz Xavier Winterhalter, Empress Eugénie Surrounded by Her Maids of Honor, 1855

-This is still the approved type of painting

-Napoleon III recent wife


-Pale skin and taffeta


-Mainstream

Gustave Courbet, The Painter’s Studio, 1854-55

-Had his own show across from the salon to provea point

-Only painted things that he could see


-No one knows much about the piece or the peoplein it

Gustave Courbet, The Young Ladies of the Banks of the Seine (Summer), 1857


-Couple prostitutes down by the river

Jean-Pierre-Alexandre Antigna, The Fire, 1850-51

-The plight of the working class, turning it intoa drama

-Looks like a massacre of the innocence feeling

William Adolphe Bouguereau, Indigent Family, 1865

-Paintings were considered fluff

-The column puts them in ancient Rome


-They look exotic, beautiful


-Academically arranged, pyramidal

Honoré Daumier, The Third-Class Carriage, c. 1862

-Less idealization 3generations of family, quasi biblical

John Everett Millais, Christ in the House of His Parents, 1850

-Charles Dickens really hated this painting

-John the Baptist carrying water


-Making Jesus look too humanistic


-Wound on Jesus’ hand --> crucifixion


-Lack of idealization of these holy figures. Theyaren’t beautiful enough

Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Ecce Ancilla Domini! (The Annunciation), 1850

-Almost looks like a fresco

-She looks frightened


-It’s cramped

William Holman Hunt, The Awakening Conscience, 1853


Ford Madox Brown, Work, 1852-65

-Not just supposed to be a slice of life

-All different elements of labor


-Center – laborers, digging a sewage whole


-Outside – not manual laborers, thinking labor –intellectual


-Flower and animal seller

William Frith, The Derby Day, 1858

-Moral messages

Jean-Léon Gérome, Death of Caesar, 1859

-Figures are dominative, and the room is huge

Frederic Edwin Church, Cotopaxi, 1862

-Almost prehistoric or biblical

George Inness, The Lackawanna Valley, 1855

-Tree stumps that have been cut by humans – clearcutting

-More industrialized than something like theOxbow


-The background is more blurred, can’t see detail


-Only tracks that exist is the one that the trainis currently on

Camille Corot, Memory of Mortefontaine, 1864

-Addition of the word memory

Édouard Manet, Concert in the Tuileries, 1860-62


-Was considered avant garde


-We don’t even see the concert


-Lack of detail would’ve been alarming


-No modeling on the umbrella – or no modeling atall


-Impersonal


-Flâneur – “roving eye”

Édouard Manet, Déjeuner sur l’Herbe, 1863

-Nude figure isn’t allegorical or exotic

--First like, “everyday” kind of figure lookingback at us


--No apparent shame of discomfort


-Young men and prostitutes hanging out in theFrench suburb by the Seine


-No message in the painting


-People criticized the painting technique – no modeling,no linear perspective, very flat


-Making suggestions of form instead of paintingdetails


-Pyramidal composition

Édouard Manet, Olympia, 1863

-Exhibited in 1865, as an example of how badManet was

-Even the name “Olympia” would’ve beenrecognizable as not a real name “porn star name”


-We sent her flowers, but her gaze doesn’tsuggest that she’s particularly excited. She doesn’t really care about theflowers because she’s such a high class prostitute, this happens to her all thetime


-Black cat represent prostitution and pussy


-Modeled after Titian’s Venus


-Very little modeling


-Flaneur


-Image of vice

Alexandre Cabanel, The Birth of Venus, 1863


Édouard Manet, Portrait of Émile Zola, 1868

-Commitment to the figure

-The pants are paint, you don’t need to see everyfiber


-The black coat just looks like a black whole

James Abbott McNeill Whistler, Symphony in White No. 2: The Little White Girl,1864

-More explicitly shows Whistler’s understandingof Japanese art

Hilaire-Germain-Edgar Degas, The Orchestra of the Paris Opera, 1868-69

-Bassoon player is central, so the ballet dancersjust didn’t make it

Eugène Boudin, Beachat Trouville, 1863

-Small, low, horizontal scenes

-Small number of figures

Claude Monet, Women in the Gardens, 1866-67

-Had to build this whole rig in order to do thispainting outside

-Really wanted to capture the lighting quality –which he believed you could only capture by painting it in the moment


-Diminish a lot of detail, because when your eyesare blinded by sunlight, you don’t see as much detail

Claude Monet, La Grenouillère, 1869

-Background doesn’t look that much farther away thanthe foreground

-Blurry line between sketch and painting

Pierre-Auguste Renoir, La Grenouillère, 1869

-Mixes the paint right on the canvas

-Morecolor, the trees are more defined than Monet

Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux, Count Ugolino and His Sons, 1861

-Ugolino is from the inferno…Dante encountershim. Ate his sons apparently

-Study in Baroque excess

Jean-Baptiste Carpeaux, The Dance, 1867-68

-People hated this

--Bacchanalian


--Wasn’t in the salon, it was on the street, andpeople didn’t like that


-Swallows its symbols and attributes, so all thestands out are the human figures


-They look intoxicated



Joseph Nicéphore Niépce, Viewfrom the Window at Le Gras, 1827

-the first photograph

-people use contrast to make it look brighterthan it is


-exposure time was 8 hours


-photo-light, graphy-drawing

Louis Jacques Mandé Daguerre, Boulevard du Temple, Paris, c. 1838

-One of his most famous photographs

-Not entirely accurate


-Anything that is moving is not captured. So thestreet looks empty


-Can only make out the guy getting his shoe’sshined

William Henry Fox Talbot, The Open Door, 1843


Mathew Brady, Portrait of Lincoln, 1860

-His official photographer

-Books-smart

Maxime du Camp, Thebes:The Eastern Part of the Peristyle of the Temple of Ramses, 1849-51


Nadar, Sarah Bernhardt,c. 1860

-Photographer to the celebrities

-Manipulated the fabric to fall perfectly


-The lighting

Timothy O’Sullivan, A Harvest of Death, Gettysburg, July 4, 1863, 1863


Oscar Rejlander, The Two Ways of Life, 1857

-Trying to make it look like a grand historypainting

Henry Peach Robinson, Fading Away, 1858


Peter Henry Emerson, Poling the Marsh Hay, 1886


William Adolphe Bouguereau, Nymphs and Satyr, 1873


William Holman Hunt, TheHireling Shepherd, 1851-52

-Some sheep are getting away

-He is supposed to be focusing on his duties, butinstead he is being lured by this woman

Augustus Leopold Egg, Pastand Present, No. 1, 1857-58

-thought the family home was going to crumble,downfall of the English society

-people were getting divorces


-serpent bracelets


-kids playing with the house of cards


-portrait of her, above it the expulsion fromparadise

Jules Breton, TheWeeders, 1868

-Breton brings us down to their level

-The beautiful sunset, not believable

Gustave Courbet, TheMeeting, or Bonjour Monsieur Courbet, 1854

-A meeting between Courbet and his patron

-Courbet is significantly bigger


-Level of appreciation between artist and patronhas switched. Courbet will create whatever he wants to

Hippolyte Bayard, Self-portraitas a Drowned Man, 1840

-Faked his own suicide

-Back then, is there was a photograph ofsomething, it had to be true

Andre Disderi, Petipa,1862

-One of the earliest form of mass production inphotography

-Oddly bare

Gustav Le Gray, BrigUpon the Water, 1856

-Studied under Delarouche – fan of detail andrealism

-Not one single photograph because the exposuretime is different for the sky and the water

William Henry Jackson, The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone, 1871

-Because of these photographs, it became thelandmark that it is

Roger Fenton, Valleyof the Shadow of Death, 1855


Alexander Gardner, Homeof a Rebel Sharpshooter, 1863

-He manipulated the way the man looked to createsomething more romantic