• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/67

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

67 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Paleoanthropological approach
-Dating of the site
-The paleoecology of the site
-Any archeological traces of behavior
-Any anatomical evidence of hominid remains
Difference between relative and chronological dating
Relative-Dating determines how old or young an object is.
Chronological- provides an estimate in years.
Straitgrapghy
Study of sequential layering of deposits
Biostratigraphy
Using known faunal sequences to aid in determining the relative age of particular stratigraphic layers.
Paleomagnetism
Dating method based on the shifting of the geomagnetic pole.
Fluorine analysis
Ground water contains fluorine; the longer a bone is deposited the more fluorine it will contain.
Chronometric dating
Based on the phenomenon of the radioactive decay of unstable isotopes.
Molecular clock
differences in DNA and use constant mutation rate to calculate divergence times or species.
DNA hybridization
Test the strength of the bond between DNA strands from two different species.
Anatomical modifications
-Lengthening of hind limb
-Rounded pelvis shape
-Inward angling of the femur
-Increased spinal curvature
-Realignment of the big toe
-Repositioning of the foramen magnum
Major figures and events of paleoanthropology
Big Brain evolved first
Different thoughts on origin of man
who was right?
COME BACK
Why was bipedality selected?
-More efficient travel between trees
-Heat dissipation
-Carrying things
-Reaching up into small trees
-Moving while picking fruit
Seeing over savannah
Fossils
The preserved remains or traces of once living things
Taphonomy
The study of how bones and other materials came to be buried in the earth and preserved as fossils.
Context
Environmental setting where an archeological trace is found
Mosaic evolution
Different systems evolve at different rates.
Paleoenvironment
COME BACK
Basial Hominids
-Cranium
-450cc
-Prognathic face
-Transitioal foramen magnum
Basal Hominids
-Dentition
-Thick enamel
-Large canines, shearing premolar, diastema
Basal Hominids
-Postcrania
-Long arms & fingers
-Femur biped-like
Basal Hominids
-Culture?
No evidence
Gracile Australopithecines
-Cranium
-450cc
-Fairly prognathic face
-Foramen magnum anterior
Gracile Australopithecines
-Dentition
-Large canines, large front teeth
-Thick enaml
-Mix of U-shaped and parabolic mandibles
Gracile Australopithecines
-Postcrania
-Small body size(3.5-4.5 feet)
-Arms and fingers still fairly long
-Humerus not weight-bearing
-Pelvis rounded
-Tibia & femur bipedal
Gracile Australopithecines
-Culture?
No evidence (chimp like?)
Gracile Australopithecines
-Ancestral traits
-Small brain
-Low cranium
-Prognathic face
-Long curving fingers
-Possibly
Gracile Australopithecines
-Derived
-Smaller front teeth
-Larger molars
-Dental arcade in between U and parabolic
-reduced canines
-Bipedal
Robust Australopithecines
-Cranium
-450cc
-"Dish shaped" face
-Foramen magnum
-Large brow ridges
-Post orbital constriction
-Large sagittal crest
-Large flaring zygomatic arches
Robust Australopithecines
-Dentition
-Small thick teeth, enormous molars
-Very thick enamel
-Mandible large and deep
Robust Australopithecines
-Postcrania
-Similar body size to graciles
-Same bipedal features
Robust Australopithecines
-Culture?
No evidence. (Chimp like?)
Homo habilis
-Cranium
-500-800cc
-Gracile skull
-Reduction in prognathism
Homo habilis
-Dentition
-Gracile dentition
-Reduction in canines, small molars
Homo habilis
-Postcrania
-Similar body size to austra
-Same bipedal features
-Extreme sexual dimorphism
Homo habilis
-Culture
-Oldowan tools
-Scavenging, not hunting
How can we tell if habilis was a scavenger?
-Cut marks on bones
Homo erectus/ergaster
-Cranium
-750-1250cc
-Long, low skull
-Large brow ridge
-Sagittal "keel"
-Thick cranial bones
-Broadest part of skull at base
-Occipital torus
-Nasal bone
Homo erectus/ergaster
-Dentition
-"shovel-shaped" incisors
-Modern-looking dentition
Homo erectus/ergaster
-Postcrania
-Increase in body size (5-6 feet)
-"fully bipedal" stride
Climate during Homo erectus/ergaster period
Ice age
Sea levels lowered, exposing land bridges
Homo erectus/ergaster
-Culture
-Acheulean tools (hand axes)
-Hunting and scavenging
-Control of fire but not making it
-Use of caves?
Early archaic genus Homo
-Cranium
-Cranial capacity increase
-Thinner cranial bones
-Skull expansion across parietals "globular" shape
Early archaic genus Homo
-Dentition
-Essentially modern
Early archaic genus Homo
-Postcrania
-Robust bodies
-Essentially modern postcrania
Early archaic genus Homo
-Culture
-Continued use of Acheulean tools
-Levallois technique
-cultural variation in stone tool
-definite hunting
-use of varied food sources
Homo Floresiensis
-400cc
-Associated with tools
-Endocast
-Diseased modern?
-Island dwarfism?
Neanderthalensis
-Cranium
-1300-1400cc
-Large, long, low skull, bulging at sides
-Occipital "bun"
-Large, arching browridges
-Midfacial prognathism
Neanderthalensis
-Dentition
-Unusual incisor wear
-Retromolar gap
Neanderthalensis
-Postcrania
-Extremely robust, large body size
-Shorter, robust limbs, powerful muscles
-Barrel chested
Neanderthalensis
-Culture
-Settlements: use of caves, mammoth bones
-Abundant use of fire
-Hunting large mammals
-Burials
-Use of clothing
-Mousterian tools
-Care for disabled & elderly
Homo sapiens
-Cranium
-1350cc
-High forehead
-Thin cranial bones
-Reduced brow ridges
Homo sapiens
-Dentition
-Smaller teeth
-Chin
Homo sapiens
-Postcrania
-Less robust
Homo sapiens
-Culture
-Burials
AMH
-Hunting large game, long range weapons
-First symbolic are, Cave paintings
-Sewn clothing, better shelters
Complete Replacement model
-Origin of modern humans in Africa
-Later replacement of all populations in Europe and Asia
-Predicts sapiens fossils in Africa first
-mtDNA evidence
Regional Continuity mode
-Local populations--> from archaics to moderns
-AMH are not a separate species from archaics
-Regional lineages
Partial Replacement model
-African early archaics evolve into AMH(150kya)
-Dispersal from S. Africa due to environmental causes, gradual
-In Eurasia hybridization and replacement
Anatomical correlates
-Hyoid bone
-Hypoglossal canal
-Broca's area
Hypoglossal canal
-Contains the nerve that controls the tounge movements
-Correlated with language ability
How much of language relies on biology?
Grammer?
-Not innate
-Not necessarily unique to human
-Grammer emerges from interactions between users of the language
Genetic maker of language
FoxP2 gene
Biocultural evolution
-Nutrution
Amino acids required in human nutrition reflects an ancestral diet high in animal protein.
Biocultural evolution
-Overpopulation
Human population increases worldwide at an annual rate of about 1.8%
Biocultural evolution
-Extinction
250mya- result of climatic changes and the creation of on supercontinent.
Accelerated evolution
-Infectious diseases-resistant to antibiotics
-Insects-Use of insecticides has resulted in many becoming resistant.