Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
10 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
Buckley v Valeo: |
spending money on behalf of a candidate or a political party is a form of protected speech |
|
|
Myers v United States: |
the President has the exclusive power to remove executive branch officials, and does not need the approval of the Senate or any other legislative body. |
|
|
US v Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation |
foreign affairs power was vested in the national government as a whole but also that the President of the United States had "plenary" powers in the foreign affairs field that was not dependent upon congressional delegation.
|
|
|
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co v Sawyer |
limited the power of the President of the United States to seize private property in the absence of either specifically enumerated authority under Article Two of the United States Constitution or statutory authority conferred on him by Congress. |
|
|
US v Nixon: |
executive privilege is denied by supreme court |
|
|
Gideon v Wainwright: |
unanimously ruled that states are required under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to provide counsel in criminal cases to represent defendants who are unable to afford to pay their own attorneys. |
|
|
Mapp v Ohio |
evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which protects against "unreasonable searches and seizures," may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts, as well, as had previously been the law, as in federal criminal law prosecutions in federal courts. |
|
|
Miranda v Arizona: |
both inculpatory and exculpatory statements made in response to interrogation by a defendant in police custody will be admissible at trial only if the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning and of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning, and that the defendant not only understood these rights, but voluntarily waived them. |
|
|
Brown v Board of Education |
separate but equal in public school system |
|
|
Engel v Vitale |
ruled it is unconstitutional for state officials to compose an official school prayer and encourage its recitation in `public schools. |
