Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
11 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
|
General direction of the recent Supreme Court decisions. |
Affirm the value of the planning process. Support good planning principles. Reject attempts to take away established planning and development tools. Support the capability of local officials, who are directly accountable to citizens, to make the best development decisions. |
|
|
Eminent Domain Berman v Parker 1954 |
Notes
|
|
|
Freedom of Speech 1994 City of Ladue v Gilleo |
Notes |
|
|
Takings Nollan v California Coastal Commission 1987 |
Notes |
|
|
Growth Management 1972 Golden v Planning Board of the Town of Ramapo |
Notes |
|
|
Affordable Housing, Fair Housing 1975 Mount Laurel, NJ |
Notes |
|
|
2005 Supreme Court Decisions |
Kelo v City of New London - Eminent domain Lingle v Chevron USA - Takings City of Rancho Palos Verdes v Abrams - Telecommunications Act San Remo Hotel L.P. v City and County of San Francisco - State courts can adjudicate challenges to land-use decisions |
|
|
San Remo Hotel L.P. v City and County of San Francisco 2005 State courts can adjudicate challenges to land-use decisions |
Notes |
|
|
Kelo v City of New London 2005 Eminent Domain |
Notes |
|
|
City of Rancho Palos Verdes v Abrams 2005 Telecommunications Act |
Notes |
|
|
Lingle v Chevron USA 2005 Takings |
Notes |
