Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
31 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
demography
|
FC:
large scale stat study of pop processes ex: fertility, mortality, migration |
|
institutional approch
|
FC:
how simliar institutions in all cultures; economic, religious, political, affect culture in different ways |
|
effect of institutional change on kibuyu marriage
|
FC:
adoption of western morals changed traditions in youth, married later |
|
relationship of bridewealth, polygyny , education
|
FC;
^education= -bridewealth, polygyny |
|
victimization trends for household/property& violent crime
|
1. Blax/Hispx
2. blax+more likely than whtz: hispx +more lukely than -hispx |
|
offending trends
|
2/3 whtz
30% blx (charged) |
|
typ offender/victim crime re: race
|
intraracial
|
|
willie horton
|
poster child bush sr.
|
|
crack v coke & racial disparities
|
Crack cheaper form of drug, more heavily used by the poor and minorities
Cocaine more expensive, used more heavily by upper-class whites Federal Law 5 g of crack 5 year mandatory sentence 500 g of cocaine 5 year maximum sentence |
|
rell betw race crim
|
1/3 of Black men supervised by Criminal Justice system
|
|
Why is race related to crime?
|
Exposure to crime
Community (age structure) Culture Economic status Social learning Family Structure |
|
Theories in Crime
|
soc str
soc lrn soc disrg conflct |
|
soc strain
|
Disjunction between things want to attain and means to get it
|
|
differential association
SOCIAL LEARNING |
Learn delinquency from delinquents
|
|
social disorganization
|
Difficult to assert control over community members
lo income transient pop = -developmont community |
|
conflict theory
|
C.J. system reflects oppressed groups
|
|
white collor v petty krime
|
sentencing diffs
goin affter wrong guy |
|
sentencing guidelines
|
used to 'even' out sentencing maldistribution.
if do this, + this = X years |
|
Segmented assimilation
|
diverse poss pathways + outcomes in th process of adaption
|
|
3 paths of (segmented) assimilation
|
1 adopt mainstream culture (what euros did)
2 underclass assimilation (poor immigrants live in poor communities, get poor traits) 3 maintaining ethnice values (possible in enclaves, tight families) |
|
pathway trad. taken by imms
|
total assimi
|
|
ehtnic enclave
|
self supportin community. almost onl one group
|
|
factors affectin the assimi process
|
1 location of settlement (montana v bronx)
2 economy/job market 3 policies on immigration |
|
+ & - consequences of each path of assimi
|
1 ADOPT MAINSTREAMM CULTURE
+ sees advancement quickly - conflict w/ group->anxiety/resentment 2 UNDERCLASS ASSIMILATION + some sort of identity comfort - low level of SES/Pol advance - stigmaed by greater society 3 MAINTAINING NATIVE ETHNIC VALUES + degree of SES/Pol advance (b/c pooled resources) + less discrimination + strong norms/values for kids + strong social network + collective supervision - - tendency for conflict/anxity as kids - lack of diversity of skills/resources - less incentive to learn english |
|
2 negatives of ;
[2] UNDERCLASS ASSIMILATION |
- low level of SES/Pol advance
- stigmaed by greater society |
|
5 positives of :
[3] MAINTAINING ETHNIC VALUES |
+ degree of SES/Pol advance
(b/c pooled resources) + less discrimination + strong norms/values for kids + strong social network + collective supervision |
|
5 negativesof :
[3] MAINTAINING ETHNIC VALUES |
- tendency for conflict/anxity as kids
- lack of diversity of skills/resources - less incentive to learn english |
|
1 postives of:
[2] UNDERCLASS ASSIMILATION |
+ some sort of identity comfort
|
|
[1] ADOPT MAINSTREAM CULTURE
|
+ sees advancement quickly
- conflict w/ group->anxiety/resentment |
|
discrim in crim justince
|
1 Arrest
DWB 1992 Maryland CLU vs. MDPD 2 Court low ses =NO bail$ 3 Charging 26% white males fully prosecuted, 39% of Black males fully prosecuted 4 Sentencing (85%) Hispanics & (78%) Blacks more likely to be incarcerated and for longer time than whites (72%) Sentencing guidelines takes some of the subjectiveness out of sentencing |
|
Attribution Theory
|
Humans make decisions with bounded rationality guess at whats going to happen
So, judges fall back on stereotypes and statistical discrimination |