Judicial Decision Making

Improved Essays
What is the role of legal rules in judicial decision making? Compare and contrast the perspectives of formalists, the American Legal Realists and HLA Hart.

How do judges apply the law? This question has stimulated many theories about how far legal rules guide a judge when it comes to their foremost job: decision making. Does a judge simply just apply rules to the facts of the case? Of course, “the importance of rules as a basic building block of law can hardly be doubted,” but it is argued that judicial discretion can also be a powerful tool when it comes to making judgements within the law. There are differing schools of thought on how far a judge can input their own views and in my essay, I will discuss whether legal rules and a judge’s
…show more content…
Hart was a lover of rules. He firstly critiqued the American legal realists by saying that rules should play more of a role in legal decision making than just a statement as to how judges will decide cases. In other words, judges can’t just apply a law which fits best with their already made decision, rules should have some sort of justification as to why they came to this decision. If a child is learning how to ride a bike, would they be more likely to learn through practice or through reading a bike riding book? Hart tries to explain that judges must have a ‘knowhow’ about how to apply the rules than just knowing the law by reading the books. When critiquing the formalists, Hart came up with the ‘open texture of law’ which suggested that judges could only use discretion in specific circumstances. For example, a word has its core meaning, however it is the outer reaches of the word or the ‘penumbra’ which may be unclear and judges must use their discretion to interpret the word. Or there may be weasel words used in a statute such as ‘reasonable’ or ‘likely’ which do not have absolute meanings and demands a judgement call. Hart shows that judges do look beyond the law, but their discretion must be relevant and fully informed. Neil MacCormick summarises Hart’s opinion, “legal rules both do and should leave a considerable scope for the discretion of judges,” suggesting that discretion is never total, but does exist in judicial decisions. We can conclude that Hart was a ‘happy medium’. However, if we apply Hart’s thesis to Riggs v Palmer the decision would be unsatisfactory. This is a case where Mr. Palmer made a legally valid will in which his grandson would be given most of his estate. To earn this immediately, the grandson killed his grandfather. The law was clear and simple that the statute required force to be given to valid wills. In

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Models Of Judicial Decision-Making. n.p.: Macmillan Reference USA, 2008. Gale Virtual Reference Library. Web.…

    • 1172 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Legal 2) Attitudinal 3) Strategic With the vague words of the constitution and these 3 models this is how the Supreme Court justices are to make decisions. 1) The legal aspect of the decision-making is strictly based on the facts, laws & precedent.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The crux of this case hinges on the construction of the provision of the HCGPP that, between 2007 and the spring of 2013, provided: A Police Services Supervisor I who is called in to work hours which are not contiguous to their regular shift shall receive a minimum of 4 hours pay at the overtime rate. The HCGPP is promulgated and revised by the Personnel Officer and enacted upon a vote of the County Council pursuant to Article VII, § 706 of the Howard County Charter. Although the HCGPP is a hybrid between a local government ordinance and an administrative regulation, “[w]hen we construe an agency’s rule or regulation, ‘the principles governing our interpretation of a statute apply.’” Hranicka v. Chesapeake Surgical, Ltd., 443 Md. 289, 298 (2015) (quoting Christopher, supra, 381 Md. at 209). Accordingly, as we set out to construe the HCGPP, our analysis begins by…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Vs Dynamic Court

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Some cases in the Supreme Court’s history stand out more than others. The case of Microsoft v. AT&T is an example of such a case. This case, which resulted in a major and influential ruling on the inclusion of software coding in patent laws, is an example of a dynamic ruling. This claim will be further explored, but first it is necessary to build an understanding of the meaning of both the dynamic and constrained perspectives. 1.…

    • 1797 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Indecisiveness

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Taft had a long and extensive career path before he became president of the United States. He attended law school in his hometown of Cincinnati, Ohio after graduating high school. He easily passed certification to be a lawyer in 1880, and a few months later he was appointed as the assistant prosecutor of Hamilton County. 2 years later the president appointed him to the position of Collector of Internal Revenue in Ohio’s first district. In 1887 Taft was appointed to be a judge for Cincinnati by the Ohio governor.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The founding fathers of the Constitution did not want the government to have too much power in any one agency, so they divided the government into the executive, legislative and judicial branch to avoid tyranny. The Supreme Court is the authority of the judicial branch and the highest of all courts, which can examine the laws and decisions made by Congress and declares them unconstitutional. This does not mean that the Supreme Court has unlimited power because each branch partakes in checks and balance in providing a government of the people. The role of the Supreme Court is to not only to ensure the people equal justice under the Constitution but to also provide as checks and balance within the government. Since the Constitution is complex,…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dynamic Court View

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages

    United States of America consists of the most diverse and complex societies in the world, with equally extensive legal system. Its legal system is ostensibly different from other countries, for its peculiarity, and in that reason, US legal system is heavily critiqued, commended, and condemned both at home and abroad. Seemingly, the Constrained Court View versus the Dynamic Court view is the most prevalent debate surrounding American judiciary system. This controversy is a deep-rooted argument tracing back to the founding fathers, who discussed whether our chosen forum for orderly dispute resolution is dynamic and flexible or constrained and limited in its ability. Some argue American legal system is undoubtedly dynamic and capable of spurring…

    • 2579 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The True Extent of the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Influence Many Americans currently lack a basic fundamental understanding of the Supreme Court’s origins and workings. The Court is a virtually unacknowledged entity. Unlike the executive or legislative branches, most Americans are only exposed to the Court during a greatly publicized issue—such as affirmative action or doctor assisted suicide. The Supreme Court is entrusted with the Constitution’s preservation through the process of judicial review. This authority means many of the Court’s decisions have a great effect on the American people.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial discretion refers to the powers conferred to a judge in the legal system of a given country to determine the direction of a matter presented to them without the interference of preceding or strict regulations that are established by statutes (Bushway et al. 2012). Judicial discretion is assigned by the legal apparatus within a given jurisdiction, meaning that court decisions may be subject to contest through the utilization of higher powers. Judges are supposed to practice the discretion allowances up to the limit specified by the law, failure to which decisions may be subjected to comprehensive vetting. For instance, the practice of discretion may be void judgement decisions in the event of bias, capricious practices, and the exercising…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study Legal Pluralism

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Introduction I will present how the Supreme Court of Canada handles the competition between normative orders. This paper will consist of a brief summary of the case, the decisions of the judges and what drove them to this decision alongside a mixture of Brian Tamanaha’s (author of Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Local to Global) point of view concerning this case in an indirect manner. I will also answer three complicated questions concerning this case. First of all, in order to better understand this case, we will have to have basic knowledge concerning this case. Starting with the appellants, which are the Sikh boy (Gurbaj Singh Multani, in this text will referred to as G) and his father (Balvir Singh Multani, will be refer…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Being a judge is regarded as one of the most prestigious professions in the world. Depending on the court, whether the judgeship is state or federal, and the state, there are many different processes used for how judges take their office. Judicial selection has been a topic for discussion as people argue about which selection method is superior and why. As a proposal to Governor O’Malley, I will offer my opinion on which method should be used for the Maryland State Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals, examine other methods, and ultimately provide why my solution is the ideal choice for judicial selection.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The role of Judges in our court system is one of the most important roles within our relative communities, they are the main point of interpretation when it comes to the law. Be it civil or criminal, they assess the evidence, and hopefully have an unbiased mind towards the pursuit of justice. Despite legislature being made through Parliament, Judges are able to teach the people through the means of precedent what laws actually mean. They help the general public to know to what extent they are abiding by the law and punishable offences under the law. The question that is being asked is whether or not Judges have the right to be creative in their rulings, or should they simply apply the law just the way it is?…

    • 1112 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, as rules are applied all-or-nothing , they are inherently restricting and are obstruct judges from determining the “right answer”. As such, Dworkin proposes that judges should view law as a system of principles, policies and other standards , rather than rules, as the former has a range of weight or importance , hence not as limiting. Also, principles may represent public standards of morality , and this means that for Dworkin, judges must draw on these societal perspectives and not political persuasion. Therefore, to follow closely these principles of the judicial system and society, judges cannot have discretion. Overall, Dworkin’s theory is theoretically sensible as it prevents the propagation of unfair or bad rules, hence allowing judges to adequately protect the rights of…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When most people think of the word law, they picture a court room with a lawyer defending his/her client, while talking to the very stern looking judge. But in fact law doesn’t have to be about court rooms and judges it can be as simple as the rules or regulations we follow on a daily basis as we are living our complex lives.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays