Analysis Of The President's Daughter By William Wells Brown

Improved Essays
Although cited as the first work of African American fiction, Clotel or, The President’s Daughter, written by William Wells Brown in 1853, proves to be more than just a story. Many sections of the work read like a slave narrative typical of the time, but in fictionalizing the piece, Brown is able to include commentary that would likely not have been allowed or encouraged in works written by African Americans of his generation. Brown’s presentation of irony through the poems of published authors and through religious teachings, as well as the use of multiple dichotomies strategically placed in juxtaposition to one another are only a few of the myriad tactics Brown used to exemplify the absurd nature of chattel slavery and to call Christians …show more content…
Peck are taught the “Biblical” views on slavery. Through the sermon of Mr. Snyder, Brown takes one of the strongest Biblical quotes against slavery (later used by Georgiana Peck in quite an opposite manner) and turns it into a lesson on obeying one’s master. “All things whatsoever ye would that men should do unto you, do it even so unto them…” (76). Through his explanation Snyder then states, “Now, to suit this rule to your particular circumstances, suppose you were masters and mistresses, and had servants under you, would you not desire that your servants should do their business faithfully and honestly…” (76). Throughout this sermon, Brown demonstrates the irony of using religious teachings to keep slaves in the chains of slavery. In one final demonstration of irony in this section, he shares the satirical conversation between the slaves after Snyder and Carlton have left. Ned, one of the slaves, shares that he thinks the people who wrote the Bible are great fools because “…dey made such a great big book and put nuttin’ in it, but servants obey yer masters” (82). To which Sam, another slave responds, “Oh, thars more in de Bible den dat, only Snyder never reads any other parts to us…” (82). This use of satirical humor demonstrates that the use of religion and enforced ignorance (not allowing …show more content…
In the same text he creates a second dichotomy of slavery and Christianity. He furthers this dichotomy through the introduction of the characters of Mr. Peck and his daughter Georgiana. Although both Christians, Mr. Peck’s older views which he uses to keep his slaves thus bound create a contrast with Georgiana younger views which strongly demonstrate Christianity’s position against slavery. “Don’t you suppose that I understand the Scriptures better than you? I have been in the world longer,” the father asks of the daughter (97). To which the daughter replies, “Yes, you have been in the world longer, and amongst slaveholders so long that you do not regard it in the same light that those do who have not become so familiar with its every-day scenes as you...” (97). What follows is several paragraphs of the daughter’s proof that the Bible, both the New and Old Testaments, does, in fact, condemn slavery, quoting such scripture as, “’He that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death’; and ‘Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness…that uses his neighbour’s service without wages…’” (97). Although the father and daughter in the text agree to disagree and live in harmony, Brown has effectively used a dichotomy to create a clear, if not less

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Hold so many hundred thousand in slavery; and annually enslave many thousands more, without any presence of authority, or claim upon them? How just, how suitable to our crime is the punishment with which Providence threatens us? Whether, then, all ought not immediately to discontinue and renounce it, with grief and abhorrence? Perhaps some (slaves) could give them lands upon reasonable rent, some; employing them in their labor still, might give them some reasonable allowances for it. The past treatment of Africans must naturally fill them with abhorrence of Christians; lead those to think our religion would make them more inhuman savages, if they embraced it; thus the gain of that trade has been pursued in oppositions of the redeemer's cause, and the happiness of…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I beseech you, do not become backsliders; especially slave-holding Christians! for the terrible effects of backsliding, slave-holding Christianity are awfully developed in my history!” (Black 9) Surprising Black found it in his heart to not feel any ill will towards his previous slave owners. The death of old Mr. Bradford “delivered me from his hands.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Antebellum Debate over Slavery, a questionable topic, split the nation and the church into separate entities. Whether Christians believed slavery was morally correct cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no”. It may have been a surprise that some religious traditions have not always been opposed to what today is clearly judged as a “heinous social evil: slavery.” It has been historically argued that the role of Christianity played parts in both the promotion and abolition of slavery. Note that this is not a judgment or self-righteous criticism to those who came before, but an understanding of their lives during that time that affected their beliefs.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery And Douglass

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While Thornwell, a minister, uses religion to justify slavery, Douglass endorses atheism over the church that serves as “the engine of tyranny, and barbarous cruelty” . True Christianity, demonstrated in countries like England , cannot but oppose slavery. Once Douglass dismisses any religious justification for slavery, he seeks to legally condemn slavery on constitutional grounds. By his interpretation, “the Constitution according to its plain reading…will be found to contain principles and purposes, entirely hostile to the existence of slavery” , namely its absence of any mention slavery, slaveholding, or slaves . Rather than arguing the morality of slavery, Douglass flippantly states, “I have better employments for my time and strength than such arguments would imply” , citing instead the “eternal principles” espoused by the founding fathers: justice, liberty, and humanity .…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Douglas saw his master tie up a young lady and whipped her until blood was dripping. The master justified his act by quoting a passage from the scripture stating, “He that knoweth his master’s will, and doeth it not, shall be beaten with many stripes. ”3 Christianity and the misinterpretation of passages in the bible allowed the oppression of slaves to go on for a very long time. The interpretation of the Bible reflects the interest of those who interpret it, and it was done so to enact cruelty upon millions of slaves.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Contours of Black Political Thought”, Michael Dawson attributes the development of a black “counterpublic” within the United States to “the historically imposed separation of blacks from whites throughout most of American history and the embracing of the concept of black autonomy (independence) as both an institutional principle and an ideological orientation” (Dawson, 27). This term and its classifications originate from key differences between the races in the ways that they perceive and experience their social and political worlds. While technically considered a part of the American public, black citizens have historically, and presently, been excluded from important discussions in the nation’s public sphere. As a result, this “counterpublic”…

    • 1189 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “He found religious sanction and support for his slaveholding cruelty… His activity in revivals was great and… his house was the preachers’ home. He starved us, he stuffed them” (33). Mr. Auld, Douglass’s owner, is a clear hypocrite in that he practices religion so devotedly, yet ‘stuffs’ other preachers and ‘starves’ his own slaves, also proving the consequences of hypocrisy. The starvation that his slaves were forced to endure, under justification of religion, confirms the motif, that pious slaveholders were the most brutal.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfortunately all good things come to an end because “after master’s marriage all things changed” (p. 12). The new mistress used religion as a way to preach to them that they “were poor miserable sinners, with the wrath of God abiding on” (p. 12) them. This backs up Glymph’s claim that “the same mistress who put out a female slave’s eye at the dinner table, on Sunday mornings read the Bible to her slaves, punctuating the reading with pictures of the devil, who, she explained, punished slaves who stole or told lies” (p. 29). This shows that despite the ideology that southern Mistresses were kind women, this mistress was not the only one that used their power through religious teachings to bellite slaves and make themselves higher than…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout Harriet Jacobs’ autobiography, the reader is given much insight into Jacobs’ personal thoughts and feelings on matters such as slavery, sin, education, and importantly, religion. Jacobs’s understanding of God and religion goes through an evolution shaped by her own encounters and circumstances as well as of those she held dear. In many instances, Harriet was heavily influenced by her grandmother, a caretaker to the girl for the better part of her young life. Though she learned from both good and bad, Harriet never rebuked her religion. Instead, she recognized the taint of slavery and believed in her own way.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    and Mrs. Shelby are debating their thoughts on slavery. Beecher writes on page 85 “I don 't want to hear such sermons; I never wish to hear Mr. B. in our church again. Ministers can 't help the evil, perhaps, -- can 't cure it, any more than we can, -- but defend it! -- It always went against my common sense. And I think you didn 't think much of that sermon, either”.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 3: Some slaves lose their faith in what they call “the cruel world they live in” because their masters deprive them of basic respect, rights (like marriage), and happiness. This causes slaves to risk escaping…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this work Fitzhugh claims that a state of dependency is required in order for reciprocal love to exist between people, allowing for a kind of paternalist care between the master 's family and their slaves. This argument leads many in the South to believe that slavery was justified since the slaves were dependent on whites for care alleviating them of stress and worry. Another argument Fitzhugh makes is about the existence of slavery throughout time and civilization comparing the South to the ancient Greeks and Romans pointing to them as a defense of the institution and trying to prove how alike and noble the South is to these societies. Richard Furman touched on an argument that was very important to the South as well as the North. God’s views on slavery.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This chapter references the presence of the slaves within the church, especially after Nat Turner’s insurrection, out of fear of separate parties resulting in insurrection. As stated in the narrative, it was a difficult task deciding where the slaves should worship, due to the supposed worthlessness of the slaves and the high value of the church. While in church, the slaves were taught to obey their masters with sections of the bible such as Ephesians 6:5 stating, “servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ.” This particular line of scripture was used as a way to convince the slaves of the church that the order of slavery was natural and should be obeyed, as it was written in the holy book. This line of scripture was also used to create a sense of righteousness within the slaveholders, stating that the slave property they owned was the correct way to go about everyday life and did not devalue them in the eyes of God.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For decades, southerners used the Bible to condone slavery, citing numerous passages approving of the institution and telling slaves to obey their masters. “As they pointed out, slavery had existed among the Hebrews without God’s condemnation, and Jesus had admonished servants to obey their masters ‘in singleness of heart, fearing God’” (Abzug). Around the same time, northern abolitionists were supporting their anti-slavery message with the Bible’s messages of kindness and equality. Despite their completely opposite views on slavery, both sides used the same book to back up their positions.…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Phillis Wheatley and Olaudah Equiano are two authors with a great deal in common. Wheatley, a poet, would often write about mundane matters, but it is her poems on slavery that are of special interest. Similarly, Olaudah Equiano wrote of slavery, but in an autobiographical form, detailing his personal journey from slavery to freedom. And yet, despite their shared circumstances, they had two very different purposes in mind when authoring their respective works, both of which shall be detailed later. Their works did, however, share a common audience: white Christians.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays