Register to read the introduction…
For students to understand the investment of an education shows a maturity that they developed by taking out loans. It is required for students to undergo a seminar about loans and how it should be monitored. This helps students understand the real life aspect of adult hood and money management ("Huffington Post" ). If college were to be free, yes students would not have to take out any loans whatsoever but many would not develop the maturity needed for life after college. It is understandable for students to disagree with the argument and refute that college is something that should be free to anyone. Though, if college were to be free it would take away from the seriousness of college like mentioned above. It may be misinterpreted that students do not take college seriously but if they were to receive a free college education it would take away from the value of that education. When the value of something is stripped or lessened we tend to also treat it with less
…show more content…
Students of high or upper middle class are more likely to attend a university because they have the means to afford it (Sander ). Students in the lower class, if they don’t have any source of funding, choose not to go to school because they just cannot afford to. This separation of classes seems to only benefit the higher levels of society because they can go to college without worrying about the loans, the defaults, the interest, and all the other factors that take part in student debt. While the lower class students who are unable to better their lives because they don’t think that college is a good enough investment to spend their time and money on. If college were to be free than class separation would not be relevant. Students can go to college to better their futures without ruining it as …show more content…
Though, this solution that seems to do all good still has negatives. Just like its opposing argument why college should not be free has various points which support its claims but there are also reasons why it is not an entirely good decision as well. This is why college should neither be free or extremely expensive but it should be cheaper so that more students will have the opportunity to go to college and the students going already won’t have to deal with the insane price of an
Students of high or upper middle class are more likely to attend a university because they have the means to afford it (Sander ). Students in the lower class, if they don’t have any source of funding, choose not to go to school because they just cannot afford to. This separation of classes seems to only benefit the higher levels of society because they can go to college without worrying about the loans, the defaults, the interest, and all the other factors that take part in student debt. While the lower class students who are unable to better their lives because they don’t think that college is a good enough investment to spend their time and money on. If college were to be free than class separation would not be relevant. Students can go to college to better their futures without ruining it as …show more content…
Though, this solution that seems to do all good still has negatives. Just like its opposing argument why college should not be free has various points which support its claims but there are also reasons why it is not an entirely good decision as well. This is why college should neither be free or extremely expensive but it should be cheaper so that more students will have the opportunity to go to college and the students going already won’t have to deal with the insane price of an