Compare And Contrast Colonel Paul Tibbets

Improved Essays
In 1945, the Enola Gay, a Boeing B-29 Super-fortress bomber, dropped an atomic bomb in Hiroshima, Japan, “killing about 70,000 people in a blinding flash of heat and radiation”, some died in an attempt to escape from the fire, some died drowning in the river, with a multitude dying years later due to radiation poising, cancer caused by the radiation as well as severe burns. This essay compares the two source documents reflecting the personal experiences of both Colonel Paul Tibbets, the pilot who dropped the bomb on the industrial city of Hiroshima and Yoshitaka Kawamoto, a school boy that survived the bomb. The two primary sources shine a light on the devastating effects of the bomb both physiologically and politically, with the Colonel Paul …show more content…
Similarly, although not American, “General Dwight D. Eisenhower, supreme commander of Allied forces in Western Europe, told Stimson that the atomic bomb should not be used. Voicing his ‘grave misgivings’, he explained that Japan was ‘already defeated’: Japan was ‘at that very moment’ seeking some way to surrender with ‘a minimum loss of face’”. On the other hand, some Americans would try to argue that the use of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima was justified due to their brutality and the attacks on Pearl Harbour. Their actions during World Ward II generated a lack of sympathy for them from American citizens, and even before World War II it could be argued that there was some American bias and prejudice targeted at “Japanese immigrants … [who] found themselves the targets of stereotyping, discrimination, violence, and exclusion that would lead directly to the internment camps of World War II”. The lack of sympathy for Japan could also be supported by Colonel Harry F. Cunningham’s statement: “For us, THERE ARE NO CIVILIANS IN JAPAN”. The brutality of the Japanese military adds to the moral context for the dropping of the atomic bomb for the pilot whereas Yoshitaka has no context or knowledge of Japan’s effect on …show more content…
However, it can be argued that it wasn’t the United States’ intention to destroy civilians, evidential of an entry in Truman’s diary where “[he] told the Secretary of War Mr Stimson, to use it so that military objectives and soldiers and sailors are the target and not women and children” and that the “the target should be ‘a purely military one’”. Another significant discussion point that goes towards proving the Japanese had sufficient warning before the bombing to prevent maximum civilian deaths was that “in the Potsdam declaration of July 26, Truman issued an ultimatum to Japan to accept ‘unconditional surrender’ or face the ‘utter devastation of the Japanese homeland’”. The threat in the ultimatum was clear to the Japanese government yet “Premier Kantaro Suzuki rejected Truman’s final warning by declaring that it was ‘unworthy of public notice’”, resulting Stimson and American politicians to proceed to “demonstrate that the ultimatum meant ‘exactly what it said’”. Another substantial argument targeted to quash beliefs of American brutality is the dropping of the LeMay leaflets. The LeMay leaflets often “told civilians to evacuate, and sometimes encouraged them to push their leaders to surrender”, yet however, these

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Document K Secretary of War Henry Stinson says clearly, “The decision to use the atomic bomb was a decision that brought death to over a hundred thousand Japanese… But this deliberate, premeditated destruction was our least abhorrent alternative”. America had been bombing civilian and industrial cities for almost a year which alone caused many more deaths than the bombs. Also, the operation to invade the Japanese mainland would have ended in a bloodbath of millions of civilian deaths including those in Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Americans had already planned to bomb those industrial cities months before. It was fair for the Japanese to fear occupation but anyone could tell that the germans and the americans were some of the nicest…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 6, 1945, the nuclear weapon “Little Boy” was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, followed 76 hours later on August 9th by the detonation of the “Fat Man” nuclear bomb over Nagasaki (Yamazaki). Hiroshima lost 70,000 lives from the radiation blast, while Nagasaki lost 150,000 in the explosion of the bombs, which is around 220,000 lives lost (Novelguide Team). To the American people who were weary from the long and brutal war, such a drastic measure seemed necessary to end this terrible period in time (Novelguide Team). Because of this convenience, it gave the United States a landslide victory over…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was July sixteenth, at 5:29 a.m. A luminous explosion was resounding over the black scorched sand in Los Alamos, Mexico. The dirt screamed death and destruction, warning the world never to take the path of nuclear weapons. This was the testing of an atomic bomb, a model for a bomb that may demolish the innocent souls of those living in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. The building of the bomb to detonate on Japan is a point of much controversy.…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bombing in Japan In August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, causing major destruction and life threatening issues, over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Everyone has their own take on what really happened and have their own perspective on controversies regarding the United States’ decision to drop the bombs. Perspectives that I will be discussing today are from three disciplines: scientific view (Leo Szilard), journalism view (Wilfred Bruchett), and historical view (a writer of an article called “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” and Bernard Feld’s article “Lessons from Hiroshima and Nagasaki”). Each have their own unique approach on the atomic bomb and it’s affects.…

    • 1803 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United State’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan during World War ll is one of the most arguable controversies in American history due to the questionable reasoning behind its use, and the horrific effects it had on Japanese citizens. At the time of the bombing it was actually supported by a vast majority of the American public. During 1945, the decision to use the bomb was not only supported but encouraged. In August of 1945 opinion polls given to the American public showed 85% of Americans supported bombing Japan (Hadley, 21). On the contrary, historians such as Gar Alperovitz have argued Truman used the bomb merely to gain political status and power over the Soviets.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ Essay

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The use of the Atomic Bomb was both necessary and justified as it immediately ended World War II, solidified the United States as a superpower, and contained the germinating powers of Japan and Russia. The use of the Atomic Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately ended World War II and stopped the continuation of catastrophic and widespread violence in Japan. The Japanese had an audacious outlook on their offense throughout the duration of the war. It was suggested by Admiral William E. Leahy that, “The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender”(Source 2).…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Was America justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? On August 6th, 1945, the US dropped an atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. It was the first time a nuclear weapon had been used in combat, against civilians. Between 40,000 and 60,00 people died instantly, and many more would die in the aftermath, either due to their injuries or radiation poisoning.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eighty thousand citizens lost their lives immediately after the bomb hit Hiroshima. In the article, “Harry S Truman’s Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb”, an eyewitness described what it was like when the bomb struck. The witness described people with “raw skin hanging in flaps around their hips” and “women without jaws screamed incoherently for help”. Innocent women and children paid the ultimate price for the attack made by Japan. Not only did hundreds die immediately after the blast but another 60,000 died by the end of the year.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine what it will be like if you are to witness a bomb incident and survive it. How much will it affect your life? How will your worldview change? Toge Sankichi is one of the few people who survived the Bombing Of Hiroshima. He wrote a collection of poems along with two other survivors of the gruesome event and, later named their collection –“Hiroshima: Three Witnesses”.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Teetering to Surrender: A Critical Analysis of “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration” Individuals see “The Shock of the Atomic Bomb and Japan’s Decision to Surrender— A Reconsideration,” by Sadao Asada, as tedious and boring. Including names of different articles and historians can seem useless and insignificant, however I challenge you to see the strengths within this piece. Asada’s academic article puts entertainment and emotional appeal aside to discuss a different side of the Hiroshima bombing then previously emphasized, due to new information. As a result, Asada’s factual article presents a convincing case: the atomic bombs and Russian pressure were both necessary for Japan to finally surrender,…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atom Bomb Effects

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the late 1930s and into the WWII era, the Manhattan Project allowed the U.S. government to enrich uranium and to then create a bomb, initially called The Gadget”, that could destroy an entire city with the immense power it released. During this period in human history, it now became possible for a single bomb to annihilate the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. More so, the radioactive aftermath of these bombings took a heavy toll on the overall health of human environments, which did not discern between civilian and military actors within the context of war. The invention of the atom bomb defined a horrifically new level of human weaponry, which challenged the ethical and moral role of the United States as a first world power after the defeat of the Japanese. During this time, David Lilienthal, the director of the Atomic Energy Commission in the 1940s, defines the effects of the use of atom bomb right after the war had ended:…

    • 1368 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was the morning of August 6th, 1945, when a specially designed B-29 bomber aircraft, given the name Enola Gay, would embark on an unforgettable mission that was ordered by U.S President Harry Truman. It took flight at 2:45 a.m., departing from the Tinian air force base sailing its way to Hiroshima, Japan. This massive plane had a full wingspan of 43 meters and a top speed of 365 mph. However, it was neither its size nor speed that made it a deadly war machine; it was the single piece of cargo that it carried. For this plane carried in its belly, the first atomic bomb that was used in a populated area.…

    • 2087 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paul Tibbets is not just an american hero, but he is also an international hero. His actions 60 years ago can still be felt and seen today. As a child he dreamt of being a pilot, but little did he know, that he would become one of the most famous pilots in history. Tibbets piloted the Enola Gay, a B-29 bomber, that dropped the atomic bomb on the city of Hiroshima. The atomic bomb led to the surrendering of the Japanese and an end to the war in the Pacific theater.…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays