The conclusion that she gives out is a reversal of the logic of patriarchal destruction requires “putting women and children first” (P150). Cuomo argues far more strongly than traditional environmental ethicists, she concludes that ecofeminist ethics can be helpful in fostering practices and institutions to promote universal flourishing that emphasized to pay interests of the person who does the valuing and also the thing that is being valued (P151). Mary Mellor has contribution to make to understanding that women have a particular perspective on the relationship between humanity and nonhuman nature. She also states the “deep materialism” is a solution to the realities of environment ethic and justice …show more content…
However, the traditional liberal approach gives less focus on the liberal foundations and animal rights. Mary Mellor describes women’s work and lives as standing at intersection of destructive economies and the natural world. In order to bring ecology and feminism together, ecofeminist see women and nature as subject to the same destructive socioeconomic and technological systems of modern male-dominated society (P223). This could explain as if women enter the socioeconomic life, they have to give up her basic women’s work, such as subsistence work and care of their family