Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself and Alice Fulton’s You Can’t Rhumboogie in a Ball and Chain
When I read poetry, I often tend to look first at its meaning and second at how it is written, or its form. The mistake I make when I do this is in assuming that the two are separate, when, in fact, often the meaning of poetry is supported or even defined by its form. I will discuss two poems that embody this close connection between meaning and form in their central use of imagery and repetition. One is a tribute to Janis Joplin, written in 1983 by Alice Fulton, entitled “You Can’t Rhumboogie in a Ball and Chain.” The second is a section from Walt Whitman’s 1,336-line masterpiece, “Song of Myself,” first published in 1855. The imagery in …show more content…
Fulton mentions Joplin’s childhood in Port Arthur, Texas, where she was harshly teased, and her self-hating addictions to unhealthy relationships, booze, and hard drugs: “a pale horse lured you, docile, to heel” (15). By the end I sense a disturbing implication with the words “You knew they worshiped drained works, emptied glass” (35). This seems to say that Joplin lived so wildly because she knew that was what the public wanted at that time, as if she felt that the only way she could find validation in the rock world was to publicly drain herself as an entire country watched and listened.
Despite the predictable and regular repetition of the words in the sestina, Fulton manages to find new images and even new meanings for the words throughout the poem, which keeps the lines lively and unpredictable, somewhat like Joplin herself. The word heel shifts in meaning and spelling from “slingbacks with